tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36634196.post9013361885199057529..comments2023-10-09T11:33:37.853-05:00Comments on The IN VIVO Blog: Out of Africa: US Court Ruling in Trovan Case Afflicts PharmaChris Morrisonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04075266444951558159noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36634196.post-84605509524918023792009-03-06T07:58:00.000-05:002009-03-06T07:58:00.000-05:00In as much as one expect pharmaceutical Companies ...In as much as one expect pharmaceutical Companies to exert more caution when carrying out clinical trial on humans, bearing in mind the fact that the people’s lives are precious, litigation such as this should not be seen by Plaintiff as money making venture or an opportunity for extortion.<BR/>As regards the Tovan trial case, Pfizer claimed they obtained approval & also obtained consent of patient through their parent or guardians as the case may be. To my mind consenting to an action makes the one who gives his or her consent liable. That is to say the person who gives his consent is partially responsible for whatever happens. Thus fairness should be the rule of the game.<BR/><BR/>End.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07603948671297321725noreply@blogger.com