tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36634196.post6881357147751795201..comments2023-10-09T11:33:37.853-05:00Comments on The IN VIVO Blog: Guest Post: Moving From The CER Wilderness To The Promised LandChris Morrisonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04075266444951558159noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36634196.post-13887043096564087782011-07-19T14:28:21.903-05:002011-07-19T14:28:21.903-05:00I agree with Tom’s comments. CER must come from m...I agree with Tom’s comments. CER must come from multi-stakeholder multi-directional engagement or it will be ignored. That’s also what I meant about disseminating it to the right audiences. What is produced from CER also needs to go back to those stakeholders through their own channels or it will lose impact.Richard Gliklichhttp://www.outcome.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36634196.post-77145197650848418192011-07-19T10:04:20.068-05:002011-07-19T10:04:20.068-05:00Great blog post. I would suggest one additional co...Great blog post. I would suggest one additional consideration. You write: "CER involves... setting priorities, generating evidence, synthesizing said evidence, and disseminating it to the right audiences." This is true, but these activities do not set CER apart from other research. CER is different from other research, because it involves these activities in the context of bi-directional stakeholder engagement. This puts activities of CER into a new environment for research, in which researchers inform and learn from the individuals an institutions that they mean to inform. Secondly, and this is implicit in what you write, CER is different because it involves comparisons of alternative interventions in real world practice settings.Tom Concannonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02292392269016861131noreply@blogger.com