Deals of the Week Takes Stock in M&A

Here at Deals of the Week, we don’t often take note explicitly of buyouts outside the biopharma sphere. But one well-publicized tech deal last month piqued our interest – and it parallels another recent pharma deal in a way we found curious.

As you may have heard, social networking giant Facebook wowed the tech field with its February takeout of smartphone communications app developer WhatsApp for a jaw-dropping $16 billion plus an additional $3 billion in employee-retention bonuses, reportedly the largest-ever acquisition price for a private, venture-backed company. (We’ll note in passing that one of the deal’s biggest winners, venture firm Sequoia Capital, is also a life sciences investor.)

Now, $19 billion is a lot of scratch – it’s a bigger pile of cash than the gross domestic product of Jamaica, and it’s in the ballpark of the price Sanofi paid for Genzyme in 2011. But a closer look at the WhatsApp deal’s terms reveals that Facebook paid just $4 billion in cash – a quarter of the deal’s baseline value – and the balance, including the retention bonuses, in its somewhat volatile stock. It’s a common formula in tech, a sector in which speculative value far outpaces revenue in many cases.

In the biopharma world, such arrangements traditionally are unheard of – but that might be changing. While many pharma mega-deals include both cash and stock components, most feature bigger cash portions than paper value. Just over a third of the $68 billion Pfizer spent to acquire Wyeth in 2009 was in stock, with the rest coming in cash; Johnson & Johnson’s $21.7 billion deal for Synthes in 2011 was in the same league, weighted roughly 65%-35% in favor of cash.

That’s why Actavis’ pending $25 billion deal to acquire Forest Laboratories last month was so unusual. Actavis paid just $26.04 per share, or 29% of the total $89.48-per-share purchase price, in cash, and swapped its stock for the rest. So there’s financial risk involved: If Actavis shares fluctuate, the deal’s total value could go up or down rapidly, perhaps before it even closes. (We note that the Facebook/WhatsApp deal technically gained more than $600 million in value before it was even announced, since its stock component was based on an already-outdated five-day average of Facebook’s share price.)

It’s not the first mega-buyout to favor equity over the hard stuff; Merck’s $42 billion buyout of Schering-Plough was tilted slightly in favor of stock over cash, with 56% of the price paid in equity. But rarely are large pharma deals ever consummated with paper value vastly outweighing cash money; it’s even less likely with smaller deals. A search of our Strategic Transactions database of reveals that only about one in 10 biopharma deals since 2008 falling into the “bolt-on” range – those ranging from a few hundred million dollars to a few billion – had a stock component.

Some life sciences companies, particularly those living off their sunny growth prospects rather than established, dividend-paying, cash-rich ones, soon could find that their stock is becoming a valuable deal-making currency. And with biotechs soaring in the public markets, some of them look like good candidates for stock-heavy deals. Like Actavis’ stock price, the Nasdaq Biotechnology Index has doubled since November 2012. Emilio Ragosa, a partner with Morgan Lewis & Bockius’ mergers-and-acquisitions practice, said mid-cap biotechs – those valued around $1 billion – are in the sweet-spot. “They tend to have less cash, but their stock is appreciating more rapidly,” he said.

Big biotechs and specialty pharmas, responsible for most of the M&A deal-making action in 2013, are enjoying exceptionally high valuations, but don’t always have big pharma-like cash flow. They’re good candidates to use their strong stock prices to beef up their businesses without denting their cash piles severely.

It’s unlikely that big pharmas will change this aspect of their deal-making strategies much; as Ragosa notes, “They have enough cash on their balance sheets.” Ever sensitive to their quarterly earnings, most large pharmas will continue to avoid using stock to take out biotechs. Seven of the top 50 cash holdings among U.S. companies belonged to pharmas, according to a 2013 Moody’s report; six were sitting on double-digit billions, led by Pfizer. - Paul Bonanos

Transactional activity has been as slow as a snowy Interstate lately, but we’re still taking stock of the latest alliances in...

Biogen/Eisai: Biogen Idec teamed up with Japanese pharma Eisai on March 5 to potentially co-develop and co-commercialize four compounds for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. While specific financial details weren’t released, Biogen will pay Eisai an upfront payment of undisclosed size, as well as a fixed number of milestones based on development, regulatory and commercial events. The team also will split worldwide profits on the drugs should they reach the market. Eisai will take the lead on the first two compounds, which it will provide. The first is a beta-site amyloid precursor protein cleaving enzyme (BACE) inhibitor dubbed E2609; Eisai discovered the compound in-house, and is about to begin its Phase II trials. The second monoclonal antibody, BAN-2401, is already in Phase II trials; it’s an immunotherapy designed to break down beta amyloid plaques after they develop. Eisai also has the option to jointly develop and commercialize Biogen’s two in-house Alzheimer’s candidates, the anti-amyloid beta antibody BIIB037 and an anti-tau monoclonal antibody, both of which are in very early stages. The BACE inhibitor space has been heating up as Merck pushes its candidate into Phase III and AstraZeneca follows closely on its heels. Both Roche and Lilly have ended programs in the space after safety signals cropped up in clinical trials. There hasn’t been any proof so far that the safety issues are class-wide, but the industry is keeping a close watch for any signs. - Lisa LaMotta

Genocea/Harvard/Dana-Farber: Fresh from its initial public offering last month, vaccine specialist Genocea Biosciences struck a research deal with Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School to study cancer immunology. Under the March 5 alliance, researchers will use Genocea’s proprietary T cell antigen discovery platform to find antigens that correlate with an anti-tumor immune response in melanoma patients. Charitable scientific network Ludwig Trust will sponsor the research; terms weren’t released. The research will play off existing work by Dana-Farber’s Stephen Hodi and Glenn Dranoff in anti-CTLA-4 therapies such as Bristol-Myers Squibb’s Yervoy (ipilimumab). Harvard microbiology and immunobiology professor Darren Higgins will lead the development of a cancer antigen protein library, which will be screened against patient-derived cells using Genocea’s platform in order to seek a correlative immune response. After an initial lukewarm reception, Cambridge, Mass.-based Genocea shares have rebounded, rising more than 50% since the company’s February 5 debut. The company is best known for its clinical pipeline of anti-infective vaccines, including therapies and preventive treatments for herpes simplex virus-2, pneumococcus, chlamydia and malaria. Its most advanced program is GEN-003, a Phase II therapy for HSV-2. - P.B.

NeoStem/Massachusetts Eye & Ear/Schepens: Cell therapy developer NeoStem also inked a deal with some of Harvard Medical School’s tentacles, entering a research collaboration March 6 with Massachusetts Eye & Ear and the Schepens Eye Research Institute. The publicly traded, New York-based stem cell company will sponsor research by Michael Young, director of Mass. Eye & Ear’s ocular regenerative medicine institute, into various eye disorders; financial terms were not revealed. The deal will fund Young’s research using NeoStem’s proprietary very small embryonic-like stem cells, or VSELs. The scientist will perform preclinical work to find uses of NeoStem’s VSEL products to combat degenerative disorders such as retinitis pigmentosa and macular degeneration. Both Mass. Eye & Ear and Schepens are Harvard Medical School affiliates. NeoStem previously has used its VSELs clinically as wound-healing therapy and to treat periodontitis; the company also has targeted cardiovascular diseases and autoimmune disorders. The eye also has been a popular target for gene therapies, thanks to its closed system and immune-privileged status. That has led to several recent fundings of companies with preclinical and clinical-stage programs. - P.B.

Thanks to Flickr user ProAeroPhoto for his photo of a different way to trade cash for stock, reproduced here under Creative Commons license.

A Rush And A Push And The Financings Of The Fortnight Is Ours

Meet us at the St. Francis, and bring your own damn water!

Happy Morgan's Eve, everyone. If you’re like FOTF, you’ve been preparing for the week ahead by breaking your day into 25-minute conversations. If our kids need to talk to us, we tell them to take the stairs to the tenth floor, run down the hall, squeeze past 120 people coming out of the bathroom, steal some bottled water left outside a partnering suite, and find Room 1450. Come in, sit down, just  wait while we finish a few emails on our phones. Yes? You can’t sleep? Not exactly an unmet medical need. We’ve also wondered a few times if a toddler’s point blank sneeze into one’s mouth counts as a new form of immunotherapy.

For those of you with older children, you might be practicing for JPMorgan this week when the conversation inevitably turns to financing. Hit your yard-work milestones to trigger the next allowance tranche. That’s the way it is as long as you live under my term sheet, er, roof. 

Whatever the year, there’s always a sensation of falling out of a holiday tree, or warm cozy bed, directly into the boiling JPMorgan cauldron. This year, organizers gave us a bit of a break, pushing the conference back one week, but the slight lag was immediately filled up by a breakneck filing of IPO documents: Six so far in the new year alone, adding to several that squeezed their paperwork through before the ball dropped on New Year’s Eve. (We have details on one of those filers, Flexion Therapeutics, in our roundup below.) A few of those, plus others still in the IPO queue after filing in the back half of 2013, have significant Phase II or Phase III clinical milestones. Yet others that haven’t declared publicly their IPO intentions also have big milestones upcoming, and we can’t help but think their S-1’s won’t be too far behind if a few companies currently in the queue make their debuts soon.

In the next Start-Up, our colleague Stacy Lawrence previews several private companies with upcoming late-stage clinical data, and one thing’s clear: There’s not a lot of 100% novel technology working up the pipeline. That’s not to say the companies in question aren’t doing important or technically difficult work. But many of the products due for data have an element of de-risking that made for faster development and a more reasonable investment thesis, especially worth noting when the company is making a push in an indication where approval has been an elusive target.

For example, Intarcia Therapeutics is delivering an off-patent diabetes drug, exenatide, via a subcutaneous pump that carries a year’s worth of treatment. Intarcia hasn’t filed an S-1 yet, not publicly anyway, but its deep roster of crossover investors makes one hear a ticking clock -- or is that the beat of the subcutaneous pump?

We can’t help but pump Start-Up's upcoming A-List, the annual roundup of the year’s top Series A financings. The 2013 winners include entrants from the fields of gene therapy, immunotherapy, epigenetics and food allergies, and a few have had very unusual financial backers. Learning who's who will be your reward for surviving next week.

And a year from now, perhaps the 2014 A-Listers will include a biotech that has launched with equity crowdfunding. That would be a first. One crowdfund platform that we’ve reported on before, Poliwogg, will try to make a splash in San Francisco next week, so stay tuned to our colleagues from "The Pink Sheet" and Start-Up for more on that. We regret to inform, however, that splashing is generally frowned upon these days in California. Unlike IPOs, raindrops are in short supply, and 2013 was the driest year on record. So we ask you out-of-towners to think twice before showering while you’re here, and if a stranger on the street looks longingly at your Evian, be kind. We’re parched. Better yet, you can save water by drinking your fill of 2014’s first installment of...

Flexion Therapeutics: As its clinical candidates for treating osteoarthritis inch closer to pivotal studies, Flexion has joined the IPO parade. In case anyone’s knees hurt from all that marching, Flexion’s three compounds are formulated for long-lasting pain relief and injection directly into the knee joint. FX006, Flexion’s lead product for front-line use, is a formulation of a common steroid, triamcinolone, that in 2013 posted solid Phase IIb results, but the company still has work to do: it plans a second Phase IIb trial that is set to begin in the second quarter of 2014, to determine the drug’s optimal dose before Phase III. A second product, FX005, is a sustained-release p38 inhibitor; Flexion is positioning the product for end-stage (pre knee replacement) osteoarthritis pain. The company aims to file an IND for a third product, the TrkA antagonist FX007 for post-op pain, later this year. Both ‘005 and ‘007 were licensed from AstraZeneca PLC, in separate deals. Flexion’s founders, Michael Clayman and Neil Bodick, famously institutionalized “A-Team”-style rapid and inexpensive to-proof-of-concept drug development at Eli Lilly & Co. as creators of that company’s ‘Chorus’ model, and struck out on their own in 2007 to monetize POC assets as a stand-alone biotech. At the time, they anticipated that by licensing in pharma assets they could develop and flip them quickly. But the economics they were offered weren’t going to provide the kind of returns they originally anticipated. The company’s reinvention underscores the difficulty of timing biotech models to pharmaceutical tastes, and – at least during the comparably leaner years of 2011-12 – pointed to industry’s increased avoidance of clinical risk. Flexion’s private backers – Versant (~30%), Sofinnova (~19%), Pfizer (~17%), 5AM (~16%), and Novo AS (~11%) – surely hope that timing public investors’ enthusiasm for biopharma is an easier task. – Chris Morrison

AC Immune: When the big Alzheimer’s Phase III trials featuring anti-amyloid treatments failed in 2012, many eyes in the field turned to AC Immune. With arguably the deepest Alzheimer’s pipeline of any private biotech, the Swiss firm said January 9 it has raised a Series D round of 20 million Swiss francs ($22 million) from existing investors. It also said it has launched a Phase I trial of a vaccine to stimulate a patient’s antibodies against phosphorylated tau, a protein that accumulates in tangled formations within neurons. Tau tangles, along with amyloid plaques, are considered two signposts of Alzheimer’s disease, but much debate remains whether the pathologies are treatable or simply an effect of disease progression. Meanwhile, one of the world’s most closely watched Alzheimer’s trials has just begun dosing patients with AC Immune’s monoclonal antibody crenezumab. The trial is funded by Genentech, the Banner Institute, and the US National Institutes of Health, and it involves people in Colombia with high genetic risk of Alzheimer’s who have yet to show cognitive decline. If successful, it would be one of the first signals that anti-amyloid therapy has a preventative effect if administered before symptomatic onset. Dosing began in December, according to AC Immune. The firm has raised 84 million Swiss francs since its 2003 inception, all from individual investors. – Alex Lash

Receptos: Seven months after completing its IPO, Receptos turned back to public shareholders to raise more money, grossing $102 million in a follow-on public offering on January 8. The biotech sold 3.3 million shares for $30.75, a 120% increase from its $14-per-share IPO price. Days before the offer closed, Receptos started enrolling patients in the Phase III portion of its RADIANCE trial of lead candidate RPC1063 for relapsing multiple sclerosis. RPC1063 is being tested in a separate Phase II trial in ulcerative colitis, and Receptos plans to release top-line data on both indications in mid-2014. Recently the USPTO issued composition-of-matter patents on RPC1063, giving the compound patent coverage until at least May 2029. Receptos is busy with others in the pipeline too: it’s designing a Phase II study of RPC4046 in active eosiniphilic esophagitis. AbbVie partnered the anti-interleukin-13 antibody with Receptos in May. Once the study results are published, AbbVie has an option to enter into a worldwide co-development deal with Receptos, which would retain co-promotion rights and split US profits. In addition, this year Receptos expects to select a lead agent from its glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor small-molecule positive allosteric modulator program and start IND-enabling studies in Type II diabetes. -- Amanda Micklus

Blueprint Medicines: The Cambridge, Mass. biotech said January 7 it had secured a $25 million Series B round as it pushes its selective kinase inhibitors, aimed at specific mutations mapped through its platform, toward the clinic. It says its lead compounds should enter the clinic in 2015. They are an inhibitor of the mutation that drives both systemic mastocystosis, an overproduction of mast cells in various organs and tissues, and a subset of gastrointestinal stromal tumors; and an inhibitor of a mutation that leads to a specific type of hepatocellular carcinoma. The firm was initially funded by Third Rock Ventures and Fidelity Biosciences, but neither of those deep-pocketed groups has taken the lead for the B round. Instead, Swiss oncology investment specialists Nextech Invest led the round, with crossover investors Biotech Value Fund and Casdin Capital, Third Rock, and Fidelity, and other undisclosed investors joining in. The crossovers could be a sign that Blueprint is gathering itself for a run at the public markets this year. The firm has been led since last spring by an interim CEO, Third Rock partner Alexis Borisy, who took over for co-founder Chris Varma without an announcement. – A.L.

Best of the Rest (Highlights of Other Activity This Fortnight): Alexar Therapeutics, the latest biotech to come out of asset-based financing entity NeXeption, closed on a $21.5 million Series A round led by New Science Ventures and Third Point Ventures to support work on a topical liver X receptor agonist for inflammatory cutaneous disorders…Auspex, which has a S-1 on file to go public, raised more venture dollars: the orphan disease-focused biotech received $20 million in Series E financing and $15 million in a venture loan...Neuralstem will advance cell therapeutics and small molecules, including lead spinal cord stem cell-derived NSI566 for ALS, thanks to a $20 million registered direct offering…after postponing its IPO in November, GlycoMimetics revived the offering and set terms at 5.75 million shares for $8…and GW Pharmaceuticals, maker of cannabinoid prescription drug Sativex, raised $88 million in a FOPO. -- AM

Stampeding wildebeests (heading to the Celgene presentation?) courtesy of t3rmin4t0r under Creative Commons license.

Deals of the Week: GSK's Stealth Move To The Coasts

GlaxoSmithKline is following some of its big pharma peers to key innovation hubs in the U.S. by opening satellite R&D centers in San Diego and Cambridge, MA.

When Johnson & Johnson opened its innovation center in Boston earlier this year, the company made a big to-do about the move and announced plans to fund two startups there. Pfizer, meanwhile, announced a significant $100 million investment through a collaboration with local hospitals and academic institutions when it anointed the Boston area the headquarters for its academic deal engine, the Centers for Therapeutic Innovation.

GSK, on the other hand, went in a different direction with its announcement, unveiling the move … via blog post. We couldn’t help but notice the difference in tactics and wonder if GSK’s decision to downplay the announcement reflects its ambitions for the satellite offices.  Whatever the reason, GSK clearly views the expansion as an evolution of its business development strategy, not a seismic shift in the way it approaches R&D.

GSK’s Damien McDevitt, VP Business Development, R&D Therapy Areas, will run the California center. He confirmed details in an interview Dec. 10. "These are both small virtual offices,” he said. “They are not large R&D centers by any stretch of the imagination.” The San Diego office will host about five to 10 scientists and the Boston office will have about 10 to 12, with a heavy emphasis on business development, he said.

"We have always had collaboration activities in these two locations, but what we haven’t had, at least on the West Coast, is a satellite office to be able to work more closely with all the groups we work with, including academia, venture and biotech,” he said. The company’s main U.S. R&D offices are located in Research Triangle Park, NC, and Philadelphia. GSK’s venture group, SR One, has offices in San Francisco and Boston. And its most recent venture effort, Action Potential Venture Capital, is headed by Imran Eba, who recently relocated to Cambridge to open up that shop.

GSK views its California and Boston R&D outposts as bridges to strengthen its existing relationships and forge new ones. A big focus, at least for the West Coast, will be on its partnership with VC firm Avalon Ventures. Earlier this year, the partners announced plans to fund 10 new single-molecule drug companies. Their first biotech, celiac disease drug developer Sitari Pharmaceuticals, was hatched with a $10 million Series A in November.

McDevitt said GSK and Avalon are aiming to establish at least three or four new companies by the end of 2014. But the new R&D centers won’t be solely focused on venture funding opportunities. They will be scouting new partnerships with academia and biotech, while also strengthening ties to existing partners. GSK has collaborations with some 22 West Coast partners, McDevitt pointed out.

GSK will be agnostic about therapy areas when it comes to new projects, and will consider both platform technologies and new products, with an emphasis on preclinical programs. Mostly, he said, the point is “keeping an open mind” and looking for breakthrough science. - Jessica Merrill

Our minds are always open, but we’re here to tell you when the deals are closed. With that in mind, here’s this week’s edition of...

Roche/Prothena: Prothena's new deal with Roche, worth $45 million in upfront payments and near-term clinical milestones and potentially up to $600 million to the biotech in the long run, gives it a major pharma partner that recently cited central nervous system diseases as a core R&D priority. In turn, Roche gets access to a synuclein antibody program that is ready for the clinic and has been guided by scientists who are world-class drug developers. The Dec. 10 deal revolves around PRX002, a Phase I-ready antibody that targets alpha-synuclein, believed to play a role in Parkinson’s and other neurodegenerative diseases. But it also gives the partners opportunities to collaborate on related conditions. Prothena is receiving most of the first tranche of $45 million from Roche up front, but a small portion of that amount will be a milestone payment when Prothena moves the drug into Phase I, an event that it expects will happen in the first half of 2014, said CEO Dale Schenk.  Prothena also has a no-cost option, which it can exercise prior to approval, to co-promote PRX002 in the U.S. Costs, revenues and profits will be divided 70-30 between the partners, with Roche assuming the larger burden and reaping the larger bounty. Prothena has been looking to out-license PRX002 in order to concentrate on some of the compounds it is targeting for diseases in smaller populations. Roche traditionally has been strong in central nervous system diseases, but, as with other parts of its business, it has moved away from large-population conditions treated largely by primary care doctors, such as depression, to more complex CNS disorders, treated by specialists.- Wendy Diller

Biogen Idec/Proteostasis: Already no stranger to Alzheimer’s disease treatments, Biogen Idec has licensed another program showing promise in neurodegenerative diseases including Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s. In a Dec. 9 deal, the biopharma disclosed a new partnership with Proteostasis Therapeutics to study and develop therapeutics inhibiting the enzyme ubiquitin specific peptidase 14, or Usp14. It’s believed that blocking Usp14 modulates proteasome activity and thereby speeds up degradation of toxic proteins such as alpha-synuclein in Parkinson’s and tau in Alzheimer’s, potentially spelling a disease-modifying approach. The deal includes research funding and potential development and commercial milestones totaling $200 million, as well as tiered royalties. The partners will jointly pay for and conduct preclinical research to identify lead compounds for clinical development. At undisclosed, pre-specified development points, Proteostasis will have the option to receive milestones or exercise an option for global co-development and co-commercialization rights. In addition, Biogen Idec is making an equity investment in Protestasis of undisclosed size. Biogen Idec already has Phase Ib anti-beta amyloid antibody candidate BIIB037, which could be moved directly to Phase III as soon as 2015 if trial data are strong enough, SVP of Neurology Al Sandrock said at Deutsche Bank’s BioFEST Conference in early December.  Cambridge, MA-based, privately held Proteostasis is backed by HealthCare Ventures, Fidelity Biosciences, New Enterprise Associates, Novartis Option Fund and Genzyme Ventures. - Stacy Lawrence

Retrophin/Kyalin/Novartis: Retrophin is making good on its plan to expand beyond its initial focus on ultra-rare diseases. On Dec. 12, it announced an agreement to acquire San Diego-based Kyalin Biosciences for an undisclosed sum. Kyalin’s lead asset carbetocin, a synthetic, nasally administered formulation of the hormone oxytocin, is in Phase I for symptoms of autism. On the same day, Retrophin made good on an August announcement that it would license in a drug to treat autism and schizophrenia from an unnamed major pharmaceutical company. The mystery licensor is Novartis, and the asset is Syntocinon (oxytocin), another synthetic, nasally delivered form of the same drug. Retrophin paid $5 million upfront plus undisclosed milestones and royalties for an exclusive U.S. license. Novartis had marketed the drug in the U.S. to assist with initial postpartum milk ejection, but discontinued it in 1997 for commercial reasons. The proceeds from a $25 million PIPE financing in August helped pay for the transactions. The licensing of Syntocinon also gives Retrophin a market-ready prescription treatment addressing a lactation deficiency for which there are no current therapies. Retrophin plans to re-launch it for that indication in the second quarter of 2014, providing an immediate, if likely small, revenue stream. As for the decision to double down on oxytocin, CEO Martin Shkreli said while Syntocinon is FDA approved, carbetocin is far behind in the clinic. “It might never be approved,” he said, “but it has superior qualities [to Syntocinon]. For instance, it’s longer-acting. So, there is a rationale to replace one with the other over time.” He added that there is a considerable amount of applied research and clinical experience behind the use of oxytocin in autism and schizophrenia. - Michael Goodman

GlaxoSmithKline/Inserm Transfert: Continuing a busy year of collaborations, the French National Institute for Health (INSERM) signed a worldwide licensing agreement Dec. 11 with GlaxoSmithKline to investigate the use of immune-checkpoint molecules in cancer treatment. GSK will pay Inserm Transfert, the tech-transfer subsidiary of INSERM, an undisclosed upfront fee with the possibility of development milestones and sales royalties. The pharma gets rights to develop and commercialize monoclonal antibodies that modulate the inducible T-cell costimulator (ICOS) protein, which offers the potential to enhance anti-tumor immune response. The agreement is part of a larger, long-term strategic alliance between INSERM and GSK. The collaboration “is making progress and illustrates a shared vision by GSK and Inserm Transfert that successful development of new drugs requires proactive action and alignment from both sides,” Inserm Transfert Executive VP, Head of Business Unit Open Innovation Augustin Godard said in a release. - Joseph Haas

Crealta/Savient: Start-up Crealta Pharmaceuticals will buy the gout drug Krystexxa (pegloticase) and other assets of troubled Savient Pharmaceuticals following an auction in bankruptcy court, the firms announced Dec. 11. Crealta will pay $120.4 million for the assets, marking its first significant investment toward becoming a specialty pharmaceutical company. Private-equity firm GTCR formed Crealta in August in partnership with Crealta’s CEO, Ed Fiorentino, and said it would invest up to $200 million to support the company. It’s the second company launched by Fiorentino and the PE firm. The two established Actient Holdings LLC in March 2009 and developed it into a diversified specialty pharmaceutical company through a series of five acquisitions, with GTCR providing a similar initial $200 million investment. Urology specialist Auxilium Pharmaceuticals acquired Actient earlier this year for $585 million upfront plus contingency payments. Now GTCR appears to be following a similar playbook in hopes of another successful exit, though turning around Krystexxa will take some effort. The drug was approved in 2009, but never achieved its perceived potential, challenged by Savient’s poor commercial planning and a market dominated by low-cost generic allopurinol. Savient never regained its footing after failing to sign a marketing partner for Krystexxa, and despite several leadership changes and a cost-reduction program, sales of the drug never led Savient into the black.- J.M.

Thanks to Flickr user ah zut for the lovely shot of one of our favorite coastlines, reproduced under Creative Commons license.

DOTW Wonders: Where Have the Private Biotech Take-Outs Gone?

We do like a nice, frothy biotech IPO market. But is it coming at the expense of stellar acquisitions of private biotechs? We miss the kind of M&A that got VCs boasting about multiples and sent ripples of excitement through the industry.

So, being the data geeks that we are, that sent us rifling through recent deals. Turns out that there have indeed been fewer decent-sized acquisition of private biotechs. This year there were only 16 worth more than $50 million, down from 26 at this time last year, according to Elsevier’s Strategic Transactions database.

And the really eye-popping deals are largely absent. Only three of this year’s private biotech acquisitions even had the biobuck-aided potential to be worth more than $500 million. Through October 2012, there were at least 10 take-outs that fit that description – although to be fair, a couple of those were of big, private specialty pharmas that were long-past any venture investment. And among this year’s biotech IPO class, 12 out of the 38 already have a market cap of more than $500 million.

Perhaps the longstanding truism that the best biotechs get bought and the rest go public has been turned on its head for a bit. Maybe IPO valuations are so rich that they’re driving up private company comps, giving potential strategic buyers pause.

There is one big biopharma buyer who’s been relentlessly active this year: AstraZeneca . It’s bought three private biotechs so far; all of them among the largest private acquisitions in 2013. Not that this comes as a huge surprise. DOTW wondered in January if then-new AstraZeneca CEO Pascal Soriot would go on a buying spree and expand into earlier stage deals.

Earlier this month, AstraZeneca bought antibody-drug conjugate oncology company Spirogen, which was in Phase II with its lead candidate, for $200 million upfront and up to $240 million in milestones. In August, it bought immune-stimulatory cancer company Amplimmune for $225 million upfront and up to $275 million in milestones.

In June, the big pharma made its biggest buy and the only private biotech acquisition this year potentially worth more than a billion when it acquired Pearl Therapeutics. Terms included $560 million upfront and up to $450 million in clinical and regulatory milestones, with an additional up to $140 million in sales-based milestones. (In total that’s up to $1.15 billion for those of you keeping score at home.) Pearl was a Phase III respiratory disease company.

While AstraZeneca is alone in its level of activity right now, recently industry’s larger companies have whole-heartedly embraced a deal structure that locks up promising early-stage assets at a reasonable price. This, of course, is the “exclusive option to acquire.” One big biopharma in particular has warmed to this approach – doing at least five of this kind of deal with private biotechs in the last couple of years. (Celgene, you know we’re talking about you.)

Celgene’s most recent option to acquire a private biotech was divulged earlier this month when it did a deal alongside a Series A round for PharmAkea Therapeutics, a small molecule cancer and fibrotic disease company that the biopharma seeded with funding last year. This time, Celgene paid $35 million for a three year discovery and development deal, and it also bought an undisclosed equity stake, alongside Bay City Capital, which invested $10 million. Celgene has an exclusive option to buy PharmAkea, which was founded by three execs from fibrotic disease play Amira Pharmaceuticals, which sold to Bristol-Myers Squibb for up to $475 million in 2011.

This week, a similar option-to-acquire deal together with a Series A came along. Sideris Pharmaceuticals garnered a partnership with Novartis worth up to $300 million, which includes the exclusive option to acquire the biotech. It also landed a $32 million Series A round from MPM Capital, Hatteras Venture Partners and Osage University Partners. Sideris is focused on developing drugs to treat transfusion-related iron overload; the partnership and the financing are intended to get its lead candidate through Phase II.

Novartis did another option-to-acquire deal alongside a Series A round with inflammatory and thrombotic diseases company Selexys Pharmaceuticals last year.

We see how an option-to-acquire deal alongside a Series A financing would be attractive. For big biopharmas, it sews up good-looking assets without fully committing, thereby providing more time to wait and see without risking losing out. For VCs, it lines-up a strong potential buyer and helps defray R&D costs from the outset in exchange for a known, possible outcome.  For biotechs, it greatly lessens financing risk, ties it close and early to a partner that can help define how it conducts its trials and gives it a built-in potential exit.

Plus, it takes the vagaries of the IPO and the M&A markets almost entirely out of the equation.  While companies and VCs risk losing out on the tantalizingly highest highs, they also can follow a known path to an exit. And while froth may be fun, it’s not at all stable.

What is entirely reliable is your DOTW team, who has yet again brought you a delightful sampling of this week’s heartiest deals. Quaff deeply of this week’s edition of  . . . .

Mesoblast/Intrexon/Ziopharm: Three partners – Mesoblast, Intrexon and Ziopharm Oncology – will be involved in an oncology drug discovery and development collaboration that could evolve into a joint venture, the firms announced Oct. 23. The initial deal is less of a commitment, however. Under the technology sharing arrangement, the partners will bring their respective expertise to the table to develop new treatments, with a first focus on lung cancer. The team will use Mesoblast’s Mesenchymal Lineage Cells and Intrexon’s RehoSwitch Therapeutic System (RTS) platform to co-develop complex transgene-enabled cell-based treatments. The resulting products should have both tumor targeting characteristics and controlled gene expression. Financial details were undisclosed. The deal is actually a 50/50 collaboration between Mesoblast and Ziopharm because Ziopharm is previously partnered with Intrexon on the technology to design and optimize therapeutic gene expression in the MLCS under a 2011 collaboration. - Jessica Merrill

deCODE/NextCODE: Like any classic Icelandic saga, the story of deCODE Genetics seems endless. The genetic diagnostics company has new life as NextCODE Health, with $15 million in Series A backing from Polaris Partners and ARCH Venture Partners. deCODE was a dot-com era high flier that aimed to mine blood samples from Iceland’s homogeneous population and meticulous record-keeping for clues to the genetic factors of disease. Following a $170 million IPO in 2000 deCODE spent a decade chasing the dream of developing its own drugs. It filed for bankruptcy in late 2009. A consortium of investors led by Polaris and ARCH, who were original deCODE investors and cashed out after the IPO, spent about $14 million to take deCODE private in 2010. Back at the helm, they did away with the drug-development ambitions and turned back to genetic research and diagnostics. They were rewarded when Amgen bought the recapitalized deCODE in 2012 for $415 million in cash up-front. Now, with Amgen focused on applying the deCODE technology to drug discovery, NextCODE has a five-year exclusive license to clinical diagnostics applications. The company says it already has contracts with clinical centers affiliated with Queensland Hospital in Australia, Boston Children’s Hospital in the U.S., Newcastle University in the UK, and Saitama University in Japan. Two top executives from the early days of deCODE, Hannes Smaranson and Jeff Gulcher, have returned to run the company as CEO and president/CSO, respectively. - Alex Lash

Amgen/Roche: As part of its international expansion and to shore up product revenues, Amgen reacquired rights from Roche to Neupogen (filgrastim) and Neulasta (pegfilgrastim) in about 100 markets for an undisclosed amount. Roche had held rights to the pair since 1989, under a license with Kirin-Amgen, a joint venture between Amgen and Kirin Holdings., in Eastern Europe, Latin America, Asia, the Middle East and Africa. Amgen is working toward building a presence in 75 countries and it will exceed that with this deal. In 2012, Neupogen and Neulasta generated about $200 million in sales in those territories. In the third quarter, Amgen reported $1.1 billion in Neulasta revenues and $466 million in Neupogen revenues. These were up 9% and 50%, respectively, from the same quarter during the prior year. (The big boost for Neupogen was entirely attributable to a $155 million order from the U.S. government during the quarter.) Both are used during chemotherapy to boost white blood cell count, thereby reducing the risk of infection for chemotherapy patients. The deal will become effective Jan.1, 2014. Amgen expects it will start to be accretive in 2014. In places where Amgen doesn’t have a presence, Roche or its distributors will continue to market products for an interim transition period. Kyowa Hakko Kirin will continue to market the drugs in some Asian territories, including China and Japan. - Stacy Lawrence

Alzheon/Bellus Health: A new neurodegenerative disease start-up is being built on the back of a failed Alzheimer’s disease compound. Start-up Alzheon has exclusively licensed a pro-drug of tramiprosate, ALZ-801, from Bellus Health, formerly Neurochem. Tramiprostate completed Phase III clinical testing in 2007 and the data were inconclusive. Alzheon plans to start a Phase II trial in Alzheimer’s disease patients, which it says will be aided by the clinical data and sub-population analyses from the more than 2,000 patients in Phase III studies of tramiprosate. The license includes rights to a family of analogs, along with an associated platform of chemotypes and clinical datasets. Alzheon expects this will provide the company with a drug development platform, as well as clinical and biomarker datasets in this patient population. Beyond ALZ-801, Alzheon expects to build a pipeline that includes additional prodrug candidates from this platform, as well as in-licensed programs.The idea is to take compounds that have demonstrated clinical proof-of-concept and apply improved clinical trial design, informed by existing patient sub-population data, more appropriate clinical endpoints and biomarkers. The newco will be led by Martin Tolar, who is its founder, president and CEO. He has previously headed biotechs including human genome interpretation system company Knome and cancer therapeutics play NormOxys Tolar was also chief business officer at Alzheimer’s-focused CoMentis, which licensed its lead beta-secretase inhibitor, then only in Phase I, to Astellas Pharma AS in 2008 $100 million up front. No financial details of the deal were disclosed; Alzheon hasn’t given any financing details yet. - S.L.

AstraZeneca/Evotec: AstraZeneca and the German drug discovery services company Evotec entered into an agreement Oct. 21 to discover novel targets and compounds with disease-modifying activity for the treatment of chronic renal disease, one of the key research areas for the restructured R&D efforts at the UK multinational. AstraZeneca will fund research on a series of molecules identified by Evotec in a program designed to explore a key mechanism of chronic kidney disease. In return, Evotec has received an undisclosed upfront payment and will receive clinical and regulatory milestones, and additional payments if products are commercialized. Renal diseases such as diabetic nephropathy, end-stage and chronic kidney disease are key targets within AstraZeneca's research effort into cardiovascular and metabolic diseases, one of three core areas for the company and based at its facilities in Molndal, Sweden. The agreement with Evotec comes just three months after AstraZeneca entered into a strategic collaboration with the private U.S. company FibroGen to develop and commercialize that company's FG-4592, a late-stage potential oral therapy for anemia in chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease in selected markets including China and the U.S. Evotec has a number of other big pharma collaborators for its drug discovery services, including with Roche and Boehringer Ingelheim, and a 2010 diabetes collaboration with AstraZeneca's biologics division, MedImmune, extended by the two companies at the start of 2013. - John Davis

Depomed/PDL: As it transforms from a research-oriented company to a product-focused one, Newark, Calif.-based Depomed is planning additional acquisitions to fortify its pain and neurology portfolio. Thanks to the $240.5 million sale of its type 2 diabetes royalties to PDL BioPharma, it will have plenty of cash to spend. Depomed sold milestone and royalty streams for marketed products and pre-approval compounds in the Oct. 21 deal. Most of the value currently lies in escalating royalties from Santarus’s sales of Glumetza (metformin HCL extended-release tablets), which generated $42.8 million in royalties during 2012 and $27.5 million during the first half of 2013. It also includes royalties from Merck’s sales of Janumet XR (sitagliptin and metformin), potential streams from investigational programs in the hands of Boehringer Ingelheim and Janssen Pharmaceuticals, and geographic royalties from LG Life Sciences in Korea and Valeant Pharmaceuticals  in Canada. Depomed built its own sales force to market Gralise (gabapentin) for shingles pain after it reacquired rights to the compound from Abbott Laboratories in 2011, and has since added pain drugs Zipsor (diclofenac potassium) and Lazanda (fentanyl) via acquisition. CEO Jim Schoeneck told conference call participants it would look to buy products already on the market or “those that are beyond clinical risk” at the registration stage. PDL once discovered antibodies, but now reaps royalties from license agreements based on its patents. The last of a key set of patents expires in 2014. If royalties from the new deal reach a total of $481 million, or twice the sale price, PCL and Depomed will split further royalties 50/50. - Paul Bonanos

Roche/Samsung: Samsung Group and Quintiles may have created their Samsung BioLogics joint venture primarily to develop and manufacture biosimilar drugs, but the Incheon, Korea-based drug factory operator is now striking new partnerships as a contract manufacturer for pharmas. An Oct. 22 deal with Roche calls for a long-term manufacturing partnership covering proprietary commercial biologics, which Samsung BioLogics will craft at two local facilities, one of which is still under construction. Financial terms weren’t disclosed and Roche didn’t reveal which medicines Samsung BioLogics will manufacture. It’s the second CMO deal since the summer for Samsung BioLogics, following a 10-year agreement with Bristol-Myers Squibb announced in July, covering an unnamed cancer antibody. Since the creation of Samsung BioLogics, Samsung forged a second JV with Biogen Idec in February 2012, creating Samsung Bioepis to develop biosimilars; it has since clarified that Samsung BioLogics will operate a CMO business while Samsung Bioepis will focus on biosimilars. - P.B.

(Thanks to Vault Brewing in Yardley, Penn. for use of their photo of a draft of Rye Pale Ale. It’s a favorite of EBI’s Chris Morrison – who hopes this mention will get him a free pint this weekend.)

Financings of the Fortnight Isn’t Convinced You Have Nice Assets

Skeptical kitten wants to see what comes out the other side.

Single-asset companies. Asset-centric funds. Project-based financing. Call it what you will, but with the biopharma news flow these days, you’d think the entire industry was restructuring itself to find, develop and sell single products. You’d think FIPCO dreams were exhibiting some serious unmet medical need.

Building the next Genentech, Amgen or Biogen Idec might not be a popular goal among biotech investors, but as START-UP's third annual life science VC survey is about to reveal, a sizable and growing minority of those investors aren’t interested in the asset-centric model. As the graphic below shows, the skeptics’ numbers (presented as a percentage of total biopharma-investor survey takers) keep inching up year by year.

Well then. Respondents left a lot of comments, too. Here are a few:

“Selectively appealing. Need[s] more human capital.”

“A fad.”

“This strategy requires additional caution.”

And this stem-winder:

“Not a sustainable model for more than a few specialized outfits; the asset scope is limited to anything between optimized leads up to Phase II POC - this is where, in most indications, Pharma can play as well. Again, it requires a specialized group that can identify ideas earlier [and] better than pharma groups and can execute better [and] faster. VC partnerships are in many cases not the right resource for this. [I] still believe this movement is primarily driven by a need to show LPs a new model now that returns on the old model have shown to be 'not so good.’”

Now that’s something to chew on. Because it’s becoming apparent that it’s exactly that combination – VC partnerships with Pharma – driving the model. Avalon Ventures will share the risk for some of its latest fund with GlaxoSmithKline, which is tapping Avalon to scout for assets in the San Diego area and holding options to buy those assets when they reach the cusp of IND-enabling studies. Index Ventures has raised its first life-science-only fund, with an asset-centric bent, with GSK and Johnson & Johnson as limited partners. (Neither will hold options, they say.)

And we’re now seeing the first products emerging from a new fund raised by TVM Capital, which hadn’t raised a fund since 2005. The new $150 million fund is also life sciences only – after 30 years, TVM will no longer actively invest in information technology – and could top out at $200 million by year’s end. Two thirds of it is dedicated not to building companies but to developing pharmaceutical compounds through proof of concept. And some of those assets will be tied to a buyer with an option at Phase II proof of concept. That buyer is Eli Lilly, which is seeing progress three years after announcing its intent to fund three VCs to run a “mirror” portfolio of single-asset companies, but not before some ups and downs.

TVM’s new fund is part of what Lilly used to call the mirror portfolio, now renamed the rather stodgy Capital Funds Portfolio. It’s one of two VCs involved – the other is HealthCare Ventures, which has formed five single asset companies (or, in Lilly-speak, project focused companies, or PFCs).

So there are various riffs on the basic asset-centric tune, but the only constant is the outcome: there isn’t any. That is to say, none of the larger-scale efforts we’ve seen so far have produced exits. Perhaps one or two now and again – such as Index Ventures’ sale of PanGenetics BV to Abbott Laboratories in 2009 -- but we're still waiting to see it pay off as a broader strategy.

We asked our survey takers a few other questions about asset financing: Are there plenty of good assets available to license? Is there enough development expertise to hire? Are LPs and Big Pharma interested in funding the model? Those answers should prove interesting – and they’ll be available in the upcoming issue of START-UP, as will a lot more detail about the TVM-Lilly tie-up. But until then, perhaps this investor comment is the best way to sum up asset financing, in all its various flavors: “They all need to show they work. Call me in a few years.”

That’s no skeptic talking. That’s Hubert Birner, the general partner at TVM leading the life science team, when START-UP asked him which model so far is working. With several efforts well under way, it shouldn’t take more than a few years to judge the early returns.

Speaking of early, your columnist needs to get up before the sun, and the night is growing late. So we’ll get our assets in gear and leave you with the rest of the current edition of…

iPierian/True North Therapeutics: Alzheimer’s hopeful iPierian said September 4 it has pulled in a $30 million Series C round, with part of that cash earmarked for a new company to house one of iPierian’s preclinical compounds. Both iPierian and the newco, True North, will move forward as developers of single assets, which puts iPierian’s discovery platform on the backburner. Formed from the 2009 merger of two companies that benefited from California’s public stem-cell initiative, iPierian aimed to use induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells as the basis for drug discovery. Its current lead candidate, IPN007, has been tested in in vitro combinations of brain cells derived from iPS cells. It targets extracellular tau, a fragmented form of a protein closely associated with Alzheimer’s disease. It’s not yet clear whether iPierian will pursue approval in Alzheimer’s or a related tauopathy such as progressive supranuclear palsy or frontotemporal dementia, but CEO Nancy Stagliano told “The Pink Sheet” the company plans to file an IND in 2014. True North, bankrolled with an undisclosed amount of iPierian’s new venture round, will follow iPierian into the clinic with a compound that targets disorders of the classical complement system, a cascade that functions as part of the innate immune system. SR One, the investment arm of GSK, co-led the round with Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, MPM Capital and all of iPierian’s other existing investors. iPierian’s original investors -- Kleiner Perkins, Highland Capital, MPM and FinTech -- helped establish the company with a $31.5 million Series A round announced in July 2009. Google Ventures led a Series B installment in July 2010, then SROne and Biogen Idec New Ventures topped off the round at $28 million in September 2010. – Paul Bonanos

Evotec: The German drug discovery services company has raised €30 million ($40 million) from the Biotechnology Value Fund and other affiliates of San Francisco investment firm BVF Partners, diversifying its investor base and bringing in extra funds to expand its program of collaborations with academia and biotech companies. BVF bought 11.8 million new shares in Evotec at €2.55 per share, a 3% discount to the closing price August 27, the companies announced August 31. At the same time, BVF bought an option to acquire 11.8 million Evotec shares from TVM Capital at €4 per share over the next 30 months. If exercised, BVF would be the largest single shareholder, with more than an 18% stake in Evotec. The Hamburg-based firm has turned its business around since it restructured in 2009, dropping costly work on its own product pipeline in favour of securing drug discovery alliances and helping pharma and biotech companies to find and optimize new compounds. It has long-term alliances with Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Genentech, Janssen, MedImmune and Ono Pharmaceutical. This year, the company has entered into a collaboration with Harvard University to identify new antibacterials, and with Dana Farber's Belfer Institute for Applied Cancer Science, to explore epigenetic oncology targets. – John Davis

ObsEva: Announced August 29 and detailed in "The Pink Sheet" DAILY, the Swiss start-up has raised a CHF 32 million ($34.9 million) Series A round of funding to develop women’s health drug candidates obtained from Merck Serono. It’s the latest in a series of asset spinouts from Merck Serono, which has cut research staff since Merck KGAA bought Serono in 2006, but its venture group MS Ventures has dedicated funds to help launch those spinouts. (Our IN VIVO colleagues have a detailed look at Merck Serono’s post-merger blues here.) Paris-based Sofinnova Partners led the round, while Sofinnova Ventures of Menlo Park, Calif., and Novo A/S of Denmark participated. MS Ventures took an equity stake as part of the licensing deal that gave ObsEva its first drug candidates. ObsEva CEO, serial entrepreneur and women’s health specialist Ernest Loumaye co-founded the firm roughly two years after selling reproductive medicine company PregLem to Gedeon Richter for CHF 150 million up-front plus milestones. Some clinical work already has been performed on at least one candidate, a Phase II program for pre-term labor that can either reduce or prevent uterine contractions. Both Sofinnova Partners and Sofinnova Ventures, independent firms with an intertwining history, were PregLem stakeholders. PregLem provided an exceptional 5 times return for Sofinnova Ventures, the firm's General Partner Jim Healy said in an interview with our Pink Sheet colleagues. The firm led PregLem's CHF 36 million Series B round in 2007. – P.B.

Acacia Pharma: The repurposing biotech said September 2 it has raised £15 million ($23.5 million) in a Series B round to fund completion of the Phase III development of APD421, its lead product for post-operative nausea and vomiting. Other companies already market the active ingredient in APD421 in a CNS indication. The fundraising, which comes two years after the Cambridge, UK-based virtual company raised $10 million in a Series A in March 2011, adds two new VCs to its investor group, Fidelity Biosciences and Novo A/S, who join Series A contributors Lundbeckfond Ventures and Gilde Healthcare. The funds extend Acacia's cash runway to mid-2015 and are enough to complete Phase II studies of the company's second pipeline product, APD403, for the prevention of chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting, the company said. Although the company plans to find marketing partners for its products at the end of Phase III, the strength of its financial backing means Acacia could consider commercializing its own products, he said. Acacia CEO Julian Gilbert is no stranger to repurposing medicines, having co-founded Arakis, a UK company with a similar strategy that was sold to Sosei in 2005 for £107 million.  Arakis worked to repurpose the muscarinic antagonist glycopyrronium bromide for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), now marketed by licensee Novartis AG as Seebri Breezhaler. - J.D.

All the Rest: CNS-focused Intra-Cellular Therapies took in $60mm (18.9mm common shares and $15.3mm in bridge notes) from institutional investors, then reverse merged with a public shell to gain its listing on the OTC…developing late-stage OTO201 and OTO104 for disorders of the inner and middle ear, Otonomy brought in $45.9 million in Series C financing…Argos Therapeutics raised $42.5mm in a Series E round led by Pharmstandard OJSC, which with other first-time backer Green Cross, will take territorial rights to Argos’ AGS003 late-stage metastatic renal cell carcinoma candidate…Syndax Pharmaceuticals’ $26.6mm Series B round will help advance Phase III Entinostat, an HDAC inhibitor for metastatic breast cancer…Also in Series B rounds, antibiotics developer MicuRx took in $25mm; Arsanis, an anti-infectives developer built around Adimab’s antibody platform, with many of the same backers as Adimab, brought in $20mm; Icon Bioscience, a company with a late-stage cataract surgery candidate, raised $14.9mm; Swiss-based Mind-NRG, focused on neurodegenerative diseases, brought in $8mm; and Rani Therapeutics, developing oral drug delivery formulations for existing large-molecule pharmaceuticals, raised an undisclosed amount…Triton Algae Innovations completed a $5mm Series A to support expansion of its PhycoLogix synthetic biology platform for producing proteins in algae and commercialization of its PhycoShield line of proteins…OTC-traded immunotherapeutics developer Stellar Biotechnologies completed a $12mm placement of 11.4mm units at $1.05…Catalyst Pharmaceutical Partners, which targets rare neuromuscular and neurological diseases, completed a $15.1mm registered direct offering of 8.8mm shares at $1.72…Two biotechs filed for initial public offerings:  lipid-based nutritional ingredients and medical foods maker Enzymotec, the third Israeli company to list on Nasdaq this year; and MacroGenics, a developer of MAb therapeutics for cancer and autoimmune diseases…Three pharmacos set IPO terms: Fate Therapeutics (stem cell-modulating treatments for orphan diseases) is offering 4mm shares at a $14-16 range; Evoke Pharma (GI-focused spec pharma) plans to sell 2.1mm shares between $12-14; and protein and antibody drug developer Five Prime Therapeutics is offering 4mm shares at a range of $12-14…infectious diseases player ContraFect raised $11.8mm in an oversubscribed convertible debt offering – which initially targeted $5 million – to support CF301, its bacteriophage lysin for staphylococcus aureus bacteremia infection…concurrent with its spin-off from Elcelyx Therapeutics, NaZura BioHealth raised $5mm in debt…Oxygen Biotherapeutics completed a $4.9mm debt offering to advance its Phase IIb Oxycyte PFC emulsion for traumatic brain injury…In fund news, former Dendreon CEO Mitch Gold has partnered with investment analyst David Miller to open a new multimillion-dollar hedge fund, Alpine BioVentures, to invest in newer biotech start-ups, particularly those focused on cancer and rare diseases. -- Maureen Riordan

Skeptical kitten photo courtesy of flickrer Jeff Eaton, who also shoots sandwiches.