Financings of the Fortnight Is Putin' Rusnano In The Spotlight

Rarely has a sovereign fund been as high-profile in the life sciences as Rusnano, which is investing $10 billion of Russian government money in companies from a variety of industries, including life sciences/biomedicine.

In a country that’s had a painful relationship with capitalism since the Soviet state collapsed, it’s no surprise the idea of a giant state-backed fund making bets on private companies has drawn skepticism – including from then-Russian president Medvedev four years ago.

Now, six years after Russia's Vladimir Putin authorized the group, it’s undergoing a shakeup and a corruption audit, apparently with Putin’s blessing. (A related project, Skolkovo – an attempt to build a Silicon-Valley-like cluster near Moscow – has also been dogged by similar investigations, allegations of corruption, and political pressure.)

Seeing how about 20% of Rusnano’s investments have landed in the life sciences so far, what happens next should be of keen interest to many in our corner of the world. That’s why we’re pointing out our colleague Stacy Lawrence’s one-on-one interview with Rusnano chairman Anatoly Chubais in the current issue of “The Pink Sheet.”

Chubais was a key figure in the post-Soviet privatizations that concentrated wealth in the hands of so-called oligarchs, and he has run Rusnano since 2008. He survived the recent shakeup, during which several directors left the fund.

Despite the turmoil, Chubais says he’s pressing ahead with more privatization plans, transforming Rusnano from a vast sovereign fund to a private management firm that runs several funds. Here’s how he described it in “The Pink Sheet”: 

“We decided to transform Rusnano into a private equity fund, which means that we will be a separate management company from Rusnano and we will transform it into a GP, which will attract investors and create a family of private equity and venture funds. And the GP itself will be privatized stage by stage… it should start next year and maybe finish between 2016 and 2017.”

Anatoly Chubais (right) is listening. (Courtesy Michael Popov.)

That's still rather murky, so we won't be surprised if plans shift in the next couple years according to the political winds within Russia. Rusnano has set off alarms – at least within certain factions of the Russian government – by posting much larger than expected losses within its portfolio. It’s unclear how much of them are associated with its life science deals, which have included big names in the US. Among its direct investments are BIND Therapeutics and Selecta Therapeutics, both built around technology from the lab of Bob Langer, a Massachusetts Institute of Technology professor and the ne plus ultra of the American ideal that combines academic and capitalist freedom. It doesn’t get more apple pie, biotechnologically speaking, than a Langer spin-out.

Going into BIND’s initial public offering in September, Rusnano owned 11.5% of the company and according to documents bought more than 200,000 shares at the IPO price, leaving it with a 9.3% stake in the company currently worth $22.3 million.

Through subsidiary RMI Investments, Rusnano also has moved heavily into Regado Biosciences, first by leading its Series E round in late 2012, then buying more shares at IPO, which took place only because Regado accepted a drastic haircut. At the end of August, RMI owned nearly 26% of Regado. The cardiovascular treatment developer debuted in late August at $4 a share and closed October 16 at $5.71.

On top of its direct investments, Rusnano has committed $200 million to Burrill & Co.’s fourth general venture fund, which began investing in late 2011. Topping that, it has earmarked $330 million to invest side by side with Domain Associates, the US venture fund, in a deal that also aims to build Russian manufacturing capacity for the products that emerged from the firms’ jointly-funded portfolio companies.

It’s a significant source of capital for hungry biotechs, but there are strings attached. Non-Russian firms that take Rusnano money must establish a footprint in Russia, part of the firm’s remit to build a domestic pharmaceutical industry through the Pharma 2020 initiative, which, as our IN VIVO colleagues explain here, is as much a proclamation as it is a specific roadmap.

Here’s how Chubais describes the tightened scrutiny of his operation: 

“We had a very, very deep check from the special state auditors and there was not a single corruption allegation, which is positive. We have about 100 portfolio companies and for some of them, they have some grounds for further investigation for their efficiency of using money from Rusnano. That’s an investigation which is going on now and we don’t know if it’s a ‘yes’ or ‘no.’”

You can scrutinize the entire Chubais interview and pelmeni more stories about the nascent Russian biomedical initiatives in our sister publications. Or, if you just want to keep it on the blog, that's your pirogitive, go ahead and stuff yourself full of…

SAGE Therapeutics: The Cambridge, Mass. CNS startup has raised a $20 million Series B, with ARCH Venture Partners, joining original backer Third Rock Ventures to help move into the clinic the first compound of what the company hopes will be an epilepsy franchise. The new money and the clinical transition comes in the first few months of the tenure of new CEO Jeff Jonas, who previously ran Shire’s regenerative medicine group. SAGE’s platform is dubbed PANAM, for “positive and negative allosteric modulation.” Its compounds are designed to dial up or dial down activity around receptors such as gamma-aminobutyric acid, or GABA, and N-methyl-D-aspartate, or NDMA, without acting directly upon the ligand binding sites of the receptors themselves. The Series B round is nearly half the amount SAGE raised in its $38 million Series A, which was disclosed two years ago and came mainly from Third Rock. (ARCH, it turns out, also topped off the Series A last month with nearly $3 million, but Jonas declined to say why ARCH’s cash was allocated in that fashion.) ARCH Managing Director Robert Nelsen joined SAGE’s board. Jonas said the company will soon file an IND for SGE-547 to treat status epilepticus, a type of seizure that lasts several minutes and can be life-threatening. With an eye toward building a franchise, SAGE will investigate the role of GABA in other epilepsies, and could add indications to ‘547 or develop other seizure drugs that act around the receptor. ARCH and Third Rock know each well. The syndicate partners previously co-invested in a pair of this year’s high-profile IPO companies: cancer metabolism company Agios Pharmaceuticals Inc. and gene therapy developer bluebird bio Inc. With its new fund, SAGE is “comfortable well into next year,” Jonas told “The Pink Sheet” DAILY, and more private funding might not be necessary. – Paul Bonanos

Macrogenics: The antibody developer raised $92 million by selling 5.75 million shares at $16 each in its October 9 IPO. In baseball terms, it hit the triple crown despite a choppy broader market. It upsized its deal; priced at the top of its range; and traded up 56% in the first day. MacroGenics has two candidates in the clinic, with another two expected to advance into clinical testing in 2014. The most advanced is margetuximab, a monoclonal antibody that targets HER2-expressing tumors, which is in Phase IIa testing. It’s intended to be a bio-better of Herceptin (trastuzumab) that not only will be more effective killing tumor cells expressing a lower level of HER2, but also enhance the immune system’s ability to kill cancer cells. Prior to the IPO, Macrogenics raised an astonishing $547 million, including $342 million from partners Gilead Sciences, Pfizer, and Boehringer Ingelheim, among others; $151 million in equity; and $54 million in government grants and contracts. These deals could keep it from leaning too heavily on shareholders; it stands to receive more than $100 million in milestone and other partnership payments by the end of 2015. Venture investors include TPG (11.6% pre-IPO stake), Alta Partners (10.5%), InterWest Partners (10%) and MPM Capital (9.4%). This is MPM’s fifth biotech IPO this year, placing it among the most active in 2013. Only ARCH Ventures, Flagship Ventures and crossover investor Fidelity have been behind as many biotech IPOs this year. – Stacy Lawrence

G1 Therapeutics: North Carolina biotech veteran Christy Shaffer, who left Inspire Pharmaceuticals shortly before Merck purchased it in 2011, has returned with the start-up G1 Therapeutics. The Chapel Hill-based company on October 16 announced a $12.5 million Series A financing that will enable it to bring its lead chemo-protectant candidate into Phase I in 2014. G1’s technology focuses on inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4 and 6 to shield cancer patients’ bone marrow from the myelosuppressive effects of chemotherapy. Early on, G1 is planning two development courses for its lead candidate: as an intravenous infusion in small cell lung cancer patients, and as an oral version to protect against radiological-induced myelosuppression, a condition that could result from a nuclear weapon strike. Shaffer joined North Carolina-based Hatteras Venture Partners in 2011 to head up its Hatteras Discovery initiative focused on incubating start-ups derived from academic research. Hatteras Discovery seeded G1 with $600,000 in 2012 and now has invested in the A round, led by MedImmune Ventures, with participation from Mountain Group Capital. With the seed funding and NIH grants, G1 selected a lead candidate, and it hopes to file the IND by summer 2014 and begin Phase I by the end of the year, Shaffer said. With potential to protect all four lineages of blood cells, G1 hopes the candidate will earn first-in-class status. – Joseph Haas

TD1 Innovations: The Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation said October 15 it has pledged to put up to $5 million into a new company, TD1 Innovations, which will scout new pharmaceutical, device and diagnostic technologies related to type-1 diabetes, the autoimmune version of the disease. If JDRF and its partner in the effort, PureTech Ventures, find compelling technologies, they’ll spin them out into new companies and provide seed funding, with hopes of advancing them far enough to find outside investors or industry partners on the other side of the so-called valley of death. It’s the first project under PureTech’s “Valley of Life” initiative, which aims to give nonprofits a legal structure to make philanthropic investments in for-profit companies without violating the tax code. With venture capitalists and pharma companies reticent to fund early stage biomedical innovation, disease foundations, patient advocacies and other nonprofits have looked to push treatments into clinical trials. To trigger JDRF’s full $5 million investment in TD1 Innovations, PureTech must raise matching funds, but the partners hope the fundraising goes well beyond that, up to $30 million, which they estimate would allow them to spin out roughly 10 new companies. Others have tried so-called “venture philanthropy” – including the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation) – but this appears to be the first time a nonprofit will have a hand, and a financial stake, in building new companies from scratch. -- Alex Lash


All the Rest: Astellas not only contributed to Mitokyne’s Series A, which brought in $45mm, but also signed a concurrent drug discovery alliance and has an option to acquire the company...a $46mm Series D by immatics biotechnologies GmbH will fund Phase III of IMA901 for renal cancer…Seragon Pharmaceuticals revealed that the value of its Series A, which closed in August, was $30mm..genome and exome sequencing company Personalis completed a $22mm Series B…Aslan Pharma’s $22mm Series B will support Phase IIb trials for gastric cancer candidate ASLAN001…Versartis’ $20mm Series D round will go towards Phase III of VRS317 for pediatric growth hormone deficiency…French vaccines developer Theravectys raised $20mm...Curemark (enzyme replacement candidate for autism) brought in $18.5mm in what looks to be its Series C round…PharmaLink raised $15mm in a Series C round…a Series A round by PharmAkea Therapeutics brought in $10mm concurrent with an alliance with Celgene, which took a stake and has an option to acquire the start-up…Molecular Templates (antibody-drug conjugates for cancer) completed an $8.5mm Series C…AxioMx fetched $2mm in a Series B round…Mid Atlantic Bio Angels invested $400k in Immunomic Therapeutics...Arrowhead Research netted $60mm through the private sale of common and preferred shares…Cytos Biotech hopes to raise CHF17.6mm ($19.5mm) in a rights offering of up to 6.3mm shares...in a private placement to institutional investors, Pharming brought in $16.3mm…Rexahn raised $5.3mm in a registered direct offering…VG Life Sciences concluded a $2.2mm private placement...multiple players completed follow-on public offerings: Portola Pharmaceuticals (hematological and inflammatory disorders) $151mm...$113mm for dermatology-focused Kythera; generic drug maker Lannett netted $71.9mm; Prothena (antibody therapeutics) $71.6mm; Dyax (phage display technology) $56.4mm; cell therapy developer NeoStem $33mm; CytRx (cancer therapeutics) $24.3mm; Cel-Sci (immunotherapeutics)  $16.4mm; Tekmira (RNAi therapeutics) $30mm; and Advaxis (cancer and infectious immunotherapies) $23mm...Aerie Pharmaceuticals set terms for its initial public offering hoping to sell 5.25mm shares between $12-14…Ruthigen set IPO terms too: 1.5mm shares at $12-14...several other biotechs filed for IPOs: GlycoMimetics (lead compound for sickle cell disease); Karyopharm (cancer and inflammation); Trevena (GPCR compounds); Xencor (MAbs);  Celladon (calcium dysregulation); Vital Therapies (liver disease); and Egalet (abuse-deterring pain drugs)…BioMarin priced five-year 0.75% senior subordinated convertible notes ($340mm) and 1.50% seven-year 1.50% senior subordinated convertible notes ($340mm)…European Investment Bank provided Norgine with an $81.2mm loan to help with product acquisitions. -- Maureen Riordan

Putin art photo courtesy of flickr member volna80.

Deal Of The Week: Nyet!

The Russian government’s announcement on April 19 that its ministry of foreign investment has rejected Abbott Laboratories Inc.’s plans to buy a domestic vaccine manufacturer, NGO Petrovax Pharm, highlights the nuances and complexities of deal making in emerging markets.

As required by Russian law, Abbott filed for permission to buy Petrovax in the fall of 2012. Published reports put the reported bid at $280 million, plus a $25 million future payment. The government’s motives for the kibosh remain unclear as of this writing, but Russia, as is the case in many countries, considers vaccines to be a strategic priority and might not want any foreign company, let alone Abbott, to own the company.

Abbott’s motives are more transparent. Many pharma companies see Russia as an attractive growth opportunity, especially since the government has embarked on a major initiative to build its life sciences ecosystem. And while the country’s operating environment is complicated, so are those of other emerging markets. Abbott is no longer a pharmaceutical company, since it spun out that portion of its business on Jan. 1 to create AbbVie Inc. But it did hang on to the company’s established products business unit focused on mature and off-patent branded drugs, which includes a seasonal flu vaccine, Influvac, and which would have been responsible for Petrovax. 

Petrovax, founded in 1996 by a team of Russian flu-vaccine researchers, is one of a handful of domestic makers of innovative medicines and one of the few owners of GMP-approved production facilities in Russia. As such, it is an intriguing example of the kind of domestic company the Russian government hopes will flourish as the country modernizes its biopharmaceutical industry. A patented influenza vaccine Grippol, discovered by Petrovax, is a best seller in Russia, and the company also makes the immunomodulator polyoxidonium.

But Russia has woefully few companies focused on developing their own innovative drugs and relies heavily on imports from foreign drug manufacturers for the most modern medicines. In 2009, it implemented Pharma2020, a blueprint for reinvigorating the domestic biopharma industry and building a scientific ecosystem that will lead to discovery on its own soils of new drugs. The near-term goal of the program is to encourage tech-transfer among foreign and domestic companies, in order to strengthen the local industry.

While these, along with broader government initiatives to improve Russia’s healthcare system and standard of living, are spurring Western interest, they lead to questions about how Russia can best balance the goals of foreign biopharma companies with its desire to be self-sufficient and foster a thriving domestic industry. Now that Russia has entered the World Trade Organization, the questions gain in relevance.

All of this will be the topic of discussion at the “Spotlight On The BRICs: Russia Track,” one of several clusters of panels that open the biotech industry’s big annual convention on April 22 in Chicago.  The author of this week’s DOTW column is slated to moderate one of the panels associated with this track, specifically on Russia’s Pharma2020/ modernization program.

“The Pink Sheet”/ EBI’s Chris Morrison will be moderating two panels: Battle of Biotech Wits, which he describes as “BIO’s only game show, where the audience gets to vote in real time on which panelists are giving the best answers to today’s most difficult and pressing questions.” A second he’s spearheading on “Adventures in Academic Partnering,” explores “what pharma wants from its increasingly large suite of academic partners, and how are industry’s leading companies structuring deals that gain them access to academia’s top technologies.”  Other EBI correspondents will be in attendance, notably Start-Up biopharma editor Alex Lash and PharmAsia News India editor Vikas Dandekar.

PharmAsiaNews executive editor Josh Berlin’s panel “Finding Innovation In Emerging Markets” ties directly to a driver we’re seeing more of—tapping innovation in and bringing innovation specifically developed for emerging markets to those regions. It’s a phenomenon known as ‘reverse innovation,’ and you can expect to see more of it as big Western companies hungry for growth, and looking over their shoulders at rising savvy competitors in the East, are aware of, if not quite ready to adapt.

Specifically, reverse innovation is “the global uptake by a multinational company (MNC) of a novel technology or strategy originally designed to address a specific need in an emerging market. One of the deal-makers active this week, Ascletis Inc., as a hybrid U.S. –Chinese company, with aims to tap new drug discoveries in both the East and West to bring to China, epitomizes this trend. And although we can’t say that Abbott’s strategy for Petrovax amounted to reverse innovation – we have no way to know if it planned to export Grippol, for example—Russians themselves clearly want to build up their pharma exports.  However early they are in the evolution, it’s something the industry is watching,  even as it musters on through the daily grind of more traditional deals…Wendy Diller

Roche/Ascletis: Roche and Ascletis are collaborating to develop and commercialize Roche’s investigational hepatitis C drug danoprevir in China, under a deal announced on April 15. The deal calls for Ascletis to fund and oversee the regulatory process, development and manufacturing of the drug in greater China, including Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Macau and receive payments upon reaching certain development and commercial milestones. The partners will collaborate on clinical development and commercialization. No direct antiviral agents are available currently for HCV in China, where more than 10 million people are infected with the disease. The majority of these are genotype 1b, which is highly responsive to danoprevir. Roche has no plans to develop danoprevir, a protease inhibitor, which also is effective against genotype 4, for the West, where the drug would face intense competition.

Two-year-old Ascletis, with headquarters in Research Triangle Park, N.C., and Hangzhou, in the Zhejiang Province of China, in-licenses and develops clinical-stage assets developed elsewhere with a goal of commercializing them in China. It also works to discover new drugs in China and bring them through mid-stage trials before striking revenue-generating global partnerships. For now, the company is focused on oncology and infectious diseases. It has raised one of biotechnology’s largest Series A rounds, a two-tranche $100 million financing led by Chinese real estate billionaire Jinxing Qi, along with other unnamed private investors in China, the U.S. and elsewhere.--WD

GNS Healthcare/CMS: GNS Healthcare, a data analytics firm, is partnering with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to assess the Department of Health and Human Services’s quality measures. In an agreement announced April 18, GNS will apply its Reverse Engineering and Forward Simulation analytics and machine learning platform to determine the impact that CMS quality measures have on the quality of patient care.
Collected and reported in an effort to produce patient which is effective, safe, patient-centered, equitable and timely, the CMS quality measures now are being linked to valued-based incentive payments to health care providers. The GNS effort will help analyze causal relationships between measures and outcomes for a triennial report CMS produces on quality measures.-- Joseph Haas

Eli Lilly/Siemens: Eli Lilly & Co. continues to plunge ahead with its Alzheimer’s disease programs despite some high-profile setbacks. It announced on April 17 that it has bought two tau imaging tracers and related technologies from Siemens Medical Solutions U.S.. The tracers are used with positron emission tomography to create images of tau tangles in the brain, and could be useful in monitoring treatment response and progression of Alzheimer’s disease, said Daniel Skovronsky, who founded Avid Radiopharmaecuticals Inc., sold it to Lilly in 2011, and became the pharma’s vice president, Tailored Therapeutics. He also remains CEO of Avid, which operates as a stand-alone division.

The tracers’ precise utility is undetermined given that they have only undergone Phase I testing. Most likely, they will complement Lilly’s beta amyloid PET agent Amyvid (florbetapir), which FDA approved in April 2012. Avid developed that agent, a key driver of Lilly’s decision to buy the company for $300 million upfront and up to $500 million in earn outs. Terms of the Siemens deal were not disclosed, and regardless of the monetary value, it indicates that Alzheimer’s remains “a significant commitment” for the company, which now “leads” the industry with its “robust Alzheimer’s program targeting both beta amyloid and tau, through therapeutic and diagnostic programs,” Skovronsky said. Lilly has two Alzheimer’s drugs in development, one in Phase III and one in Phase II, and a third compound slated to enter the clinic by mid-year. Each represents a different approach to treatment, but all target amyloid-beta in some way. Lilly also has a tau program in preclinical trials, with the first compound expected to enter the clinic within the next two years.--WD

Pfenex/Agila Biotech: Strides Arcolab Ltd.'s U.S. unit, Agila Biotech, has agreed to a joint venture with U.S.-based Pfenex Inc. aimed at developing six biosimilar drugs to be marketed globally. Agila will be responsible for preclinical and Phase I testing as well manufacturing, while Pfenex will develop an optimized production strain, process and analytical package for each product. In the fourth quarter, the JV will start clinical testing of a biosimilar of Bayer's Betaseron (interferon beta-1B) to treat multiple sclerosis. Agila holds a 51% stake in the JV. The manufacturing of the biosimilars will be at a new Malaysian facility that Agila and Bio-XCell agreed last month to build. Pfenex is a 2009 spin-out from Dow Chemical Co.--Stacy Lawrence

Santaris/Bristol-Myers Squibb: In the third RNA partnership in the last month, Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. and Santaris Pharma AS have entered into a broad discovery and development deal. For the biotech, it brings a new partner into the string of deals that continue to be its main source of capital.

The deal disclosed on April 16 is to discover and develop candidates using the biotech’s Locked Nucleic Acid (LNA) platform. Santaris develops oligonucleotide therapeutics that target disease-related messenger RNAs (mRNAs) and microRNAs. Santaris will receive $10 million upfront and up to $90 million in potential milestones and research funding, in addition to undisclosed royalties on worldwide sales of any resulting products.
Santaris already has a partnership with Pfizer Inc., which expanded an existing deal in 2011. The original deal was made with Wyeth in 2009, prior to the latter’s acquisition by Pfizer. The biotech also secured deals with Shire PLC in 2009 and GlaxoSmithKline PLC in 2007. The biotech said last year it had raised more than $125 million in non-dilutive capital through its collaborations. Santaris isn’t planning any financing and that it expects to rely upon existing and new deals for cash. Isis Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Moderna Therapeutics Inc. each secured big pharma partnerships for RNA within the last month.--SL

Xencor/CSL: Australian drugmaker CSL Ltd. has licensed Xencor Inc.’s technology platform for use with its monoclonal antibodies. Financial details of the license were not disclosed, but the companies said that Xencor will receive an upfront payment plus preclinical, clinical, regulatory and sales milestone payments, as well as royalties on product sales. Xencor’s Xtend platform increases the half-life of proteins, allowing for a better pharmacokinetic drug profile by introducing subtle changes to the protein sequence.
CSL is best known for its work in blood plasma and vaccines. The company has products for hemophilia, immunodeficiency, and blood loss during surgery in their pipeline. The companies did not reveal what therapeutic areas would be pursued under the collaboration, but CSL will provide the targets.

CSL and Xencor first teamed up in 2009 when the Australian company paid an undisclosed upfront, development milestones and royalties for access to Xencor’s XmAb platform, a suite of engineered antibody Fc domains and tools that optimize antibody candidates. The first candidate from the collaboration was moved into clinical testing in early 2012.--Lisa Lamotta

Epizyme/Abbott: Epizyme, focused on personalized medicine approaches to cancer, announced a partnership with Abbott on April 18 to develop a molecular companion diagnostic test for one of its candidates. The test is to be paired with EPZ-5676, an inhibitor which targets the DOT1L histone methyltransferase for mixed-lineage (MLL-r) leukemia, an aggressive genetically defined subtype of acute myeloid and acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Deal terms were not disclosed.

Abbott will use its proprietary FISH (fluorescence in situ hybridization) technology to develop a test that can detect cancer-causing MLL genetic alterations that affect the function of DOT1L. Epizyme plans to use the test to find ideal leukemia patients for ‘5676, its most advanced clinical candidate. Currently in Phase I, the small-molecule compound is licensed ex-U.S. to Celgene.--JAH

Financing Deal of the Year Nominee: Rusnano/Domain and CoDa Therapeutics

It's time for the IN VIVO Blog's Fifth Annual Deal of the Year! competition. This year we're once again presenting awards in three categories to highlight the most interesting and creative deal making solutions of the year. The categories are: M&A Deal of the Year, Alliance Deal of the Year, and Exit/Financing Deal of the Year. We'll supply the nominations (a half dozen in each category throughout December) and you, the voting public, will decide the winners (by voting early and often, commencing once we've announced all the nominees). Strap yourselves in, it's The Race for the Roger™.

How about voting for a deal that turns conventional wisdom on its head.

The biopharma industry has looked to emerging markets for near-term revenues and cost efficiencies, but not for scientific or commercial innovation. An umbrella deal between Rusnano, a five-year-old $10 billion Russian sovereign fund, and the US venture capital firm Domain Associates, announced in March, and a subsequent tie up with Domain portfolio company CoDa Therapeutics, goes some way toward erasing those misperceptions. At the same time, the partners’ tie up reflects sovereign funds’ increasingly important role in shaping the life sciences industry.

And it does so in such a creative, enticing way that Russia, not typically known as a life sciences innovator, is generating excitement among US VCs and biopharma companies. Rusnano is linked to Russia’s Pharma 2020 program, which is already impacting Big Pharma’s development decisions, as indicated by their deal-making activities in the country. At the same time, Domain’s commitment to the joint effort has also been intense, but the relationship is worth the effort because it’s potentially so lucrative, according to Domain partner Brian Dovey.

The size and structure of the partners’ deals are noteworthy: Rusnano, which has a mandate to broadly invest in nanotechnology around the globe, and Domain, the quintessential US VC, are investing up to $330 million each in Domain’s portfolio life sciences companies and up to $190 million to build a manufacturing facility in Russia for the products that would be sold in Eastern Europe out of the Domain companies.

The aim is to “spur modernization of the Russian healthcare market” by providing that country, along with Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Commonwealth of Independent States, with next-generation pharmaceuticals, medical devices and diagnostic products, Rusnano executives said at the time of the announcement. Under the agreement, roughly 20 existing and potentially new US-based Domain portfolio companies will benefit from the collaboration, and the partners can also co-invest in third-party technology.

In July, after months of review, the partners announced their first beneficiary: Domain’s wound-healing biotech CoDa Therapeutics. The San Diego-based company is licensing rights to its technology in Russia and the CIS to the new Domain/Rusnano-backed Russian pharma company. In exchange, Domain, along with current CoDa investors GBS Ventures and BioPacificVentures, and new investor Rusnano, committed nearly $40 million to CoDa, closing a Series B financing that began in 2011.  The VC syndicate and Rusnano are each contributing equal amounts. CoDa, as with all Rusnano life sciences investments, has to establish R&D operations in Russia as well.

Domain isn’t the only US investor Rusnano is working with, nor is Rusnano the only tool the Russian government is working with to entice US venture capitalists and biotech entrepreneurs. It’s also established a business school and life sciences incubator, Skolkovo, in a collaboration with Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and has other stimulus programs aimed at building a biotech industry. But by bringing in US innovators and offering them the carrots they need most: attractive financing, potential market opportunities, and acknowledgement of American’s entrepreneurial savvy, Russia may be demonstrating a new model for building a much needed ecosystem.

--Wendy Diller

image via

While Awaiting New CEO, AstraZeneca Already Busy On The Business Development Front

Every player in big pharma is facing a patent cliff to some extent, but while some are dealing with their losses through diversification or a targeted approach to deal-making activity, it is unclear what direction AstraZeneca, the pure-play pharma among the giants, will take now that Seroquel IR (quetiapine) is off-patent, to be followed soon enough by Crestor (rosuvastatin).

A good portion of this uncertainty stems from the vacancy in the chief executive’s office. CFO Simon Lowth has been serving as acting CEO since predecessor David Brennan stepped down June 1 under a plan announced during the Anglo/Swedish pharma’s first quarter earnings call in April. The second quarter review occurred July 26, but while the impacts of patent expiries to top-selling AstraZeneca products are becoming clear, with a new permanent CEO not selected yet, the company’s strategy going forward remains a source of much speculation.

AstraZeneca focused largely on recent launches and late-stage pipeline prospects during the call, while Brennan’s successor was not discussed and current executives did not offer much new in the way of corporate strategy for the near term. In talking up its pipeline, AstraZeneca said it has 90 candidates in clinical development, although it counts seven drugs in the approval and launch stage among that number – an instance of trying to have its cake and eat it too?

Still, an 83-candidate pipeline is nothing to sneeze at, although Wall Street generally does not enthuse about AstraZeneca’s internal R&D. Instead, citing Leerink Swann analyst Seamus Fernandez as an example, the call is for significant M&A to yield a new future for AstraZeneca. In his July 26 note reiterating a “market perform” rating for AstraZeneca’s shares despite an 18% year-over-year decline in revenues, Fernandez re-issued an earlier call for “aggressive” M&A activity.

“We continue to believe the most realistic path forward for AstraZeneca is a more aggressive M&A strategy … but if current trends continue, additional and likely substantial restructuring may be necessary to sustain profitability necessary to deliver on the company’s “balanced” capital allocation strategy,” he wrote.

On May 31, on the cusp of Brennan’s departure, Fernandez opined that an “increased reliance on international sales growth from Japan and the emerging markets” would not be sufficient to overcome a precipitous revenue decline in the U.S. Indeed, AstraZeneca reported emerging markets revenue growth of just 1% during the second quarter, the same growth as during the first quarter, but attributed the lackluster pace to supply-chain issues stemming from new IT snags at a manufacturing site in Sweden. But for those weak links, the chain would have produced 8% growth in emerging market sales during the quarter, AstraZeneca execs claimed.

Still, there has been a clamor for growth-by-acquisition. And in a year that has seen plenty of biopharma M&A already, AstraZeneca has contributed its share of deals.

It teamed up with Bristol-Myers Squibb earlier this month to buy Amylin Pharmaceuticals for a whopping $7 billion. While Bristol is the actual buyer, AstraZeneca will send Bristol $3.4 billion after the deal goes through, almost half the purchase price, and then the two pharmas will use Amylin’s Byetta (exenatide) and Bydureon (exenatide extended-release) to bolster their combined diabetes portfolio.

In fact, it seems only accurate to describe AstraZeneca’s business development approach as aggressive already, even if it let Bristol take the lead in the Amylin buyout. Just since April, AstraZeneca has participated in eight deals, highlighted by a $1.27 billion purchase of Ardea Biosciences centered around gout candidate lesinurad. During that period, the pharma also has signed partnerships and licensing agreements with Cellworks Group, Link Medicine, Axerion Therapeutics, Amgen and The Medicines Co.

During the July 26 call, Lowth and President, R&D, Martin Mackay indicated that those deals should be seen as part of an ongoing business development strategy the AstraZeneca will continue to pursue. While Mackay focused on open innovation and numerous R&D tie-ups with partners of all sizes, Lowth said the company is pleased with the three significant deals it has completed (Ardea, Amgen, Amylin) this year, adding “there’s a whole host business developments and collaborations going on across research and development.”

Whether a new, permanent CEO – be it Lowth, Mackay or someone from outside the organization – will bring a new direction is unknown, but it is fair to say that AstraZeneca already is pursuing an active and hectic business development course. – Joseph Haas

Now, here is our weekly look at other developments in the world of biopharma deal-making …

Merck/Chimerix and Merck/Yamasa: The marketer of billion-dollar HIV drug Isentress (raltegravir), Merck & Co., struck two July 24 deals to bolster its pipeline of compounds that fight the same virus. Merck paid $17.5 million upfront to privately held Chimerix for worldwide rights to the Phase I drug CMX157, a lipid-antiviral conjugate designed to deliver the antiviral compound tenofovir to cells in high concentrations with reduced systemic effects. Milestones could add $151 million to the deal’s value, and Merck would pay Chimerix royalties if the drug is approved. CMX157 also is thought to hold promise in treating hepatitis B virus. Research Triangle Park, N.C.-based Chimerix, which has raised $101 million from venture investors, expects to put the funds toward trials on CMX101, a broad-spectrum antiviral soon to enter a Phase III study for cytomegalovirus. Separately, Merck partnered with Japan’s Yamasa Corp. in a deal of undisclosed size that gives it global rights to EFdA (4-ethynyl-2-fluoro-2-deoxyadenosine), a nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor that has shown efficacy against highly resistant strains of HIV. Merck also said it would begin a Phase IIb trial on one of its own HIV pipeline drugs, MK-1439. – Paul Bonanos

Boehringer Ingelheim/Funxional: Boehringer Ingelheim is expanding its respiratory drug pipeline with the acquisition of a novel oral small molecule anti-inflammatory drug developed by Funxional Therapeutics. The companies announced a deal July 23 in which BI will acquire Funxional’s lead candidate, FX125L, a potential first-in-class somatotaxin and back up compounds for an undisclosed amount. Respiratory disease is one of BI’s core therapeutic areas; the company markets the inhaled blockbuster Spiriva (tiotropium bromide) for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and has several respiratory drugs in late-stage development, including tiotropium for asthma and nintedanib for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. The addition of FX125L will give BI a first-in-class asset in a novel pathway that acts through the type-2 somatotaxin receptor (sstr2). As an oral drug, the market opportunity for FX125L could be significant given that inhaled drugs dominate the respiratory landscape. But few details are known about the drug’s clinical safety and efficacy so far. Funxional’s CEO Geoff Race said that in addition to offering the best terms, BI also had the pedigree and track record in respiratory disease that Funxional’s investors were looking for. “It is not just the initial payment that is important. It is the probability of getting the product to market that is also important,” he said. “We were pleased to have a partner like BI who we felt had the financial resources as well as the technical resources to take this product to the market.” Since its somatotaxin portfolio was essentially Funxional’s only program, the deal provides an exit for the biotech’s backers Index Ventures, Novo AS and Ventech. But Funxional may not vanish; it’s already evaluating its other earlier-stage technologies. “We are thinking about which one goes into the pipe,” Race said.” “We will take a little bit of time to think about that and start research programs later in the year.” – Jessica Merrill

Roche/AREVA: Roche and AREVA Med, a French biopharma specializing in the development of radioactive isotopes for therapeutic use, announced on July 27 that they will collaborate on a novel alpha radio-immunotherapeutic platform to focus on high-unmet need cancers. No terms were disclosed. Together, they will assess the efficacy of combining Roche’s engineered antibodies with AREVA Med’s radionuclide, Lead-212, a compound that shows promise in treating some types of cancer. Alpha radiation consists of fast-moving, high-energy helium atoms which, because of their large size, are easily stopped by a light, relatively insubstantial barrier such as a few inches of air or a piece of paper. Therefore, alpha radiation travels only short distances in human tissue. This mean that its energy is absorbed in a smaller area for improved cell death with little damage to healthy tissue. By targeting cancer cells with highly specific antibodies combined with Lead-212, there is an opportunity to more precisely irradiate and kill cancerous cells. In 2011, AREVA Med acquired Macrocyclics, a leader in metal chelators, which also will  participate in the collaboration with Roche. AREVA Med is associated with the National Cancer Institute (NCI), the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) and the French National Institute of Health and Medical Research (Inserm). – Michael Goodman

Photo credit: (AZN's R&D location, Molndal, Sweden) Wikimedia Commons

Financings of the Fortnight Has Its Eyes On the A's

Our sister publication START-UP starts up every new year with The A-List, a review of the previous year’s Series A life-science financings, which we feel are an excellent proxy for gauging investor enthusiasm for new biomedical ventures and measuring the shifts in what’s getting funded, and who’s doing the funding. 

But we can’t wait for the end of the year to peek, so we’ve tallied year-to-date Series A financings using Elsevier’s Strategic Transactions. (Two weeks ago, we did the same with follow-on public financing.) The top-line result: In dollar terms, we’re on pace to equal 2010, a particularly glum year with $876 million total raised in Series A money. To match last year’s modest rebound of $1.1 billion raised, Series A funding must pick up with alacrity, a trend that’s hard to imagine as the Euro crisis continues to bubble and the U.S. loses its economic momentum from the spring. 

Here are the numbers: In the first half of 2012, 33 Series As across the biopharma, device, and diagnostic industries totaled $423 million. The majority of the first half’s total comes from the biopharma sector, mainly US and European companies. (24 financings, $345 million.) That’s just $30 million fewer raised than in the first six months of 2011 from the exact same number of transactions. So it’s fair to say biopharma isn’t lagging as much as the device sector. Still, biopharma numbers to date are not on track to reach the full-year 2011 biopharma figure of $887 million from 63 deals.

The average fundraise in the first half is $15.1 million, slightly higher than 2011’s full year tally of $14.1 million. But wait: the higher total is, ahem, warped by Warp Drive Bio’s $125 million investment from Third Rock Ventures, Sanofi, and Greylock Partners in January. Warp Drive is researching the medicinal properties of naturally occurring microbes with R&D support from Sanofi through a separate collaboration. It’s one of the most intriguing deals of the year so far, not just for the cash considerations, but for the unusual structure that gives Sanofi a nonexclusive option to acquire Warp Drive if certain milestones are achieved. At the same time, Warp Drive has the right to force a sale of the company if other milestones are met. It’s a brave new world when Series A-funded companies and their investors are locking in future acquirers. 

We’re also seeing a lot of solo Series As, a sign that the VC shakeout has left fewer viable syndicate partners for early-stage deals. Ten Series As were solo-backed, and the largest was Third Rock’s $41 million infusion into Global Blood Therapeutics, a firm developing candidates that alter key blood proteins, with an initial target in sickle cell disease. Third Rock is no stranger to solo A-rounds, notching SAGE Therapeutics, Blueprint Medicines, and Lotus Tissue Repair in 2011.

But the Boston and San Francisco firm also knows that good syndicates are hard to find: it joined Bessemer Venture Partners and Frazier Healthcare in a $10 million financing for Alcresta, which is working on a nutritional supplement that contains more digestible and absorbable forms of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids. Alcresta was the syndicate’s third go-round together, all with the same management team. The same phenomenon cropped up this year with the investment trio of Astellas Venture Management, InterWest Partners and Sutter Hill Ventures, who are now on their fourth venture together. It’s not rocket science for people who’ve made money together to revisit the formula, but the reduced pool of investors makes it all the more likely.

While oncology and peripheral vascular disease start-ups dominated the 2011 biopharma Series As, Series As the past six months were focused mainly on neurology, gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal, and metabolic disorder companies, which together made up 40% of the financing. Neurology led with seven financings bringing in $64 million, or 17% of the first-half dollar total and nearly a third of the deals. Four GI-related financings followed, while metabolic and musculoskeletal players had three deals apiece.

Biopharma Series A's By Therapeutic Category, January-June 2012

 

Note: The total number of deals is greater than 24 as several financings involve companies in multiple therapeutic areas.

SOURCE: Elsevier’s Strategic Transactions

Even though CNS start-up Cerecor’s $22.5 million round was shy of the $30 million raise the company had forecasted a year ago, the transaction topped the list as highest raise in CNS and third-largest Series A in the first half of 2012. Counting the second half of 2011, we’ve now seen 16 A-round neurology deals the past year, which perhaps holds counterbalance to Big Pharma’s well-documented exit from the CNS space.

On the device side, six Series A rounds raised $49 million. The dollars and number of deals lag the full-year 2011 total of $151 million raised in 24 transactions. In vitro diagnostics have tallied $27 million in three deals, slightly better than the 2011 pace, which finished with $48 million from 10 transactions. It’s worth noting that corporate venture played a role in three of the  biggest device and diagnostic Series As. Merck Serono Ventures along with KPCB and TPG took part in the first tranche of the Series A raise for Auxogyn, a company focused on infertility assessment using noninvasive devices that determine embryo viability. Novartis Ventures Fund led a $12.5 million first round for ImaginAb, with participation from Merieux Developpement (bioMerieux’s venture arm) and other investors. ImaginAb is developing engineered antibody fragments for diagnostic imaging, initially in cardiovascular diseases. And the molecular diagnostics company Xagenic pulled in $10 million in a  January round that included Dutch diagnostic giant Qiagen.

Now if you'll excuse us, we're shifting our attention away from data dives and toward springboard and platform dives. But first, many thanks to the Olympian effort of Amanda Micklus and Maureen Riordan for this week's column. It's time to raise the torch for another edition of...

  
California Institute for Regenerative Medicine: California's state agency that funds stem-cell and other regenerative medicine R&D announced July 26 $150 million in grants for translational projects that are expected to file an IND or complete an early-stage clinical trial within four years. Only one of the awards goes to a for-profit entity, the San Francisco Bay Area firm StemCells Inc., which wants to use stem cells to treat spinal cord injuries in the neck both in patients with new injuries and in patients who have been paralyzed for months or years. The other six awards are going to academic or institutional researchers and range from $14 million to $20 million per project. The lack of private sector recipients underscores the challenges of turning stem-cell-related research into product candidates. Three years ago, CIRM handed out $225 million in grants to move 14 preclinical projects toward the clinic; only one of the 14 was based at a for-profit company. -- Alex Lash


Bluebird Bio: Once an area that drew great skepticism, gene therapy is now drawing big money. Cambridge, Mass.-based start-up Bluebird Bio raised its third big round of funding since the beginning of 2010, tapping a diverse syndicate of investors for $60 million in Series D money that will support ongoing trials of gene therapies for rare diseases. It comes just as European regulators have approved the first gene therapy product in Europe, another strong sign of the advances the field has made the past decade. The Bluebird deal includes contributions from public and private growth investors Deerfield Partners and RA Capital, hedge fund operator Ramius Capital Group, and two unnamed public investment funds, as well as strategic backer Shire. They join returning venture firms ARCH Venture Partners, Third Rock Ventures, TVM Capital, and Forbion Capital Partners. Bluebird Bio raised $35 million in a Series B round in early 2010, then was slated to take $30 million in two tranches of Series C capital in an April 2011 agreement. The startup, however, held a call option which it never exercised on the second tranche; its VCs instead put that $15 million into the Series D round at a higher price, according to Bluebird CEO Nick Leschly. The firm plans to conduct a Phase II/III study of a treatment for childhood cerebral adrenoleukodystrophy and a Phase I/II study of a beta-thalassemia and sickle-cell disease therapy. Both are built on Bluebird’s lentiviral technology, in which a patient’s own bone marrow stem cells are genetically modified and returned to the patient, potentially obviating the need for a transplant. – Paul Bonanos

Alimera Sciences: The publicly-traded ophthalmic company said July 18 it has grossed $40 million in a sale of preferred shares to Palo Alto Investors, Sofinnova Ventures, and New Enterprise Associates. The trio gets 1 million preferred shares and warrants to buy 300,000 more, with each preferred share convertible into 13.75 common shares. Investors can trigger a conversion at will, outside of a lockup period and other constraints. The preferred shares entitle their holders to dividends and other distributions pro rata with the common stock, as well as unspecified downside protection. The shares can also convert to common if Alimera’s lead product gains regulatory approval or if Alimera raises additional equity at predefined share prices, Sofinnova partner Garheng Kong told the IN VIVO Blog. Kong was among Alimera’s original investors at Intersouth Partners and is now one of the partners investing Sofinnova’s new $440 million life-sciences-only fund, up to 25% of which could go toward positions in public biotech companies, Kong said. (Alimera is the fourth investment from the fund.) Alimera’s lead product is Iluvien, an eye implant that delivers drug up to 36 months to treat vision loss associated with diabetic retinopathy. It is approved in France, Austria, Portugal, the U.K., and of this week, Germany. The US FDA asked for more clinical data last November, the second time it has issued a complete response letter for Iluvien. No new PDUFA date has been disclosed. The private stock sale must be approved by a majority of common stockholders; as of July 17, holders with 56% of the common stock had agreed to vote in favor, according to Alimera. – A.L.

Durata Therapeutics: With a handful of biotechs knocking on the IPO window this fortnight, only one as of this writing has gotten through. Antibiotic developer Durata on July 18 raised $68 million by selling 7.5 million shares at $9 each. The firm missed its original goal of $75 million by pricing below the intended $11 to $13 per share range, but it sold more shares to bridge part of the gap. Existing investors Domain Associates, New Leaf Ventures, Aisling Capital, Sofinnova Ventures and Canaan Partners agreed to buy 3.8 million shares, more than 50% of the offering, to get the deal done. That’s par for the course these days. It’s rare for a biotech to go public without insider participation, as we detailed in February. Nothing’s changed since then. If biotech backers want to reach liquidity, they’ll more than likely need to help get the glass half-full. Investors are adding not subtracting Durata shares, but their holding times to date have been relatively short. Durata was founded less than three years ago from the ashes of Pfizer’s nearly $2 billion acquisition of Vicuron Pharmaceuticals. In Pfizer’s hands, one of Vicuron’s main products, the antibiotic dalbavancin for skin and soft-tissue infections, received three rejections from the FDA. But with the agency rolling out new regulatory guidelines for certain antibiotics, Durata feels it can do it right this time and recoup the rewards of bringing a once-weekly intravenous gram-positive antibiotic to market. It is currently conducting two Phase III trials. BofA Merrill Lynch and Credit Suisse led the underwriting team, which has the option to buy 1.1 million additional shares for 30 days following the IPO. – A.L.

CoDa Therapeutics: The San Diego wound-healing firm is the first to benefit from venture firm Domain Associates’ new strategic alliance with the Russian sovereign fund Rusnano. On July 24, Domain said CoDa has completed a $40 million Series B financing, with contributions split equally between Rusnano and a Domain-led syndicate of CoDa’s current investors. These include the Australian VC firm GBS Ventures and the New Zealand firm BioPacific Ventures. Domain and Rusnano said in March they were each committing up to $330 million over the next three to five years to fund Domain portfolio companies. CoDa came first because it needed financing, according to Domain partner Brian Dovey. It is in Phase IIb trials for a wound-healing compound aimed at venous leg ulcers and in Phase II trials for the same compound for treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. Domain companies that receive Rusnano funds are obligated to license exclusive rights to sell their products in Russia and the CIS regions to NovaMedica, a new Russian company that Rusnano and Domain are spending up to $190 million to create. The partners claim it will be Russia’s first fully integrated, innovative domestic drug firm, and will be structured as a joint venture between Rusnano and Domain. As a condition of its Series B financing, CoDa has licensed exclusive rights to its lead product and related technologies in Russia and the CIS to the new company, in exchange for undisclosed royalties on sales. Domain is one of several U.S. life sciences venture capital firms that are working with Rusnano, a five-year-old $10 billion sovereign fund charged with helping Russia jumpstart domestic high-tech industries, and as profiled this spring in START-UP's Capital Matters column, it has been aggressive making investments in Western biotech, both directly and through other funds such as Domain and Burrill & Co.  – Wendy Diller

Photo courtesy of the International Olympic Committee.