2013 Alliance Of The Year Nominee: Celgene/OncoMed

It's time for the IN VIVO Blog's Sixth Annual Deal of the Year! competition. This year we're once again presenting awards in three categories to highlight the most interesting and creative deal making solutions of the year. The categories are: M&A of the Year, Alliance of the Year, and Financing of the Year. We'll supply the nominations (about a half dozen in each category throughout over the next week or so) and you, the voting public, will decide the winners (by voting early and often, commencing once we've announced all the nominees). Strap yourselves in, it's The Race for the Roger™.

Celgene loves the option-based deal almost as much as it loves bringing new oncology candidates into its early-stage pipeline, and Deals of the Year can prove that mathematically.

The big biotech's early December tie-up with OncoMed for a six-pack of anti-cancer stem cell therapeutic candidates was Celgene's ninth deal of 2013, after negotiating seven transactions in 2012. And of those 16, at least nine involve cancer and eight were option-based agreements.

The deal once again put Celgene at the forefront of early-stage oncology dealmaking and added to the already impressive smorgasbord of drug candidates and technologies to which it holds rights or options. This is not to say the complicated deal with OncoMed was business as usual, for it was one of the most complicated agreements of the year in biopharmaceuticals, necessitating a term sheet that might have resembled a Rube Goldberg machine, and quite lucrative for OncoMed -- potentially very lucrative.

To wit: Celgene paid $177.25 million up front ($155 million cash along with a $22.25 million equity investment in OncoMed, which totaled 1.47mm shares at $15.13, a 15% premium.) It also committed to a myriad of milestones dependent on the success of up to six different projects.

In return, Celgene will receive option rights on six novel stem cell therapeutic candidates, including the lead asset, demcizumab (OMP-21M18), a humanized MAb inhibitor of Delta-Like Ligand 4 (DLL4) in the Notch signaling pathway. The deal also covers five preclinical or discovery-stage large-molecule programs to target cancer by stopping cancer stem cells from replicating and/or differentiating such cells to make them more vulnerable to chemotherapy. Celgene gets full license to one of the preclinical programs, while OncoMed retains U.S. co-development and co-commercialization rights on the other five assets.

Celgene can exercise its option on demcizumab after the completion of planned Phase II studies. The antibody is being tested in three Phase Ib trials with standard of care: with gemcitabine and Abraxane in first-line advanced pancreatic cancer, with carboplatin and pemetrexed in first-line advanced NSCLC, and with paclitaxel in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. The last of those is a Phase Ib/II study being conducted at MD Anderson Cancer Center.

If Celgene options demcizumab, the two companies will share global development costs, with Celgene covering two-thirds of the expense. If the drug is approved by FDA, they will co-commercialize it in the U.S., with 50/50 profit sharing. Outside the U.S., Celgene would develop and commercialize the antibody, with OncoMed eligible for milestones and tiered double-digit royalties.

In September Celgene got label-expansion approval for Abraxane to treat pancreatic cancer, which Hastings says is the greatest unmet medical need in cancer at present. But the executive said Celgene was motivated just as strongly by demcizumab’s showing to date in NSCLC patients.

“They were equally impressed with the NSCLC data, in terms of response rate and some durability that we’re seeing there,” Hastings said. “What this deal enables us to do is more Phase II studies than we would have done on our own, so we’ll be looking at additional Phase II studies beyond these two to give the drug multiple shots.”

Celgene also gets rights to OncoMed’s preclinical anti-DLL4/vascular endothelial growth factor bispecific antibody, as well as four preclinical or discovery-stage biologics programs that target other cancer stem cell pathways, including RSPO-LGR, a pathway in which human R-spondin proteins are targeted by antibodies to disrupt binding with their receptors, the leucine-rich repeat-containing G-protein coupled receptors. Celgene’s exclusive license is to one of those four biologics programs.

For the four programs not outright-licensed by Celgene, the Redwood City, Calif., biotech gets terms similar to those negotiated for demcizumab – two-to-one global development cost-sharing with Celgene covering the larger portion, 50/50 U.S. co-commercialization with profit-sharing, and mid-single-digit to mid-double-digit royalties on sales outside the U.S. For the licensed program, OncoMed can earn mid-single-digit to mid-double-digit royalties on worldwide sales.

Got all that? If you care about bio-bucks totals, OncoMed could earn more than $3 billion over the lifetime of the collaboration, if virtually every box in the agreement gets checked off. Even if earn-outs don't reach 10 figures, though, it's a lucrative and validating deal for OncoMed, which just raised $88.8 million in an IPO this past July.

image via Wikimedia commons

Deals Of The Week Road-Tests Biopharma Options

More options are always better, right? Obviously, that’s a “yes” when it comes to building our dream Tesla Model S. But big biopharma is getting nowhere fast with deals that build in options to license drug candidates.

The number of option-to-license deals executed peaked at more than 30 in 2009, when biotech financing had dried up in the wake of the 2008 U.S. economic meltdown, and has declined every year since, according to data from Elsevier’s Strategic Transactions database. That’s only counting deals with an option-to-license as the main component. What has big biopharma accomplished with its slew of option deals in the last decade and a half? Not much, so far. Even though option-based partnerships can be cheap, they also rarely offer results.

Option-to-license deals, or option-alliances, are often a way of making a half-hearted bet on biotechs’ riskiest, early-stage candidates and technologies. For small biotechs, the extent to which they rely upon these deals can be a sign of their relative fiscal desperation. Option-alliances lock up biotech assets very early, with a high level of continued uncertainty (and development costs) for the biotech and a capped future potential upside.

For pharma, these deals are a bargain – pay a little upfront and part of early-stage R&D costs and then pick up rights to a candidate, or not, typically after clinical proof-of-concept data emerges. Biotechs are able to retain control of their assets for a while longer, potentially allowing them to move development forward faster.

We analyzed all R&D-based option-alliances with a disclosed potential value of $100 million or more. That’s almost 120 deals, some dating back as early as the late 90s. Many of the more recent ones remain active, of course; these deals typically extend over at least three or four years. Most of the remaining deals either expired or were terminated. We could only find seven of these $100M+ deals that actually resulted in option exercises, and some of those later blew up in the clinic.

GlaxoSmithKline is a nice case in point. It has been one of the most active R&D options dealmakers, with at least 18 of these deals, most of which were initiated from 2006 through 2009. A few of GSK’s option-alliances have resulted in abject disappointments – most prominently with Nabi Biopharmaceuticals for the smoking cessation product NicVax, which failed in Phase III. Last year, Nabi merged with Biota.

Others got shunted to the side due to changes in GSK priorities (a $1.5B bio-bucks deal w Targacept was terminated in 2011 as the pharma left neuroscience) or as biotechs became defunct (after a $1.2B bio-bucks deal in 2007, Epix Pharmaceuticals then slid out of existence in 2009). Several of GSK’s option-to-license deals were done under its Center of Excellence for External Drug Discovery (CEEDD), which silently sank under waves of corporate restructuring around 2010.

(GSK is undeterred from experimenting with its approach to external, early innovation. This week it picked the first set of winners from a discovery-stage academic competition. See below for further details.)

The pharma does have several ongoing option-alliances, including at least four with companies that recently IPO’d. One is an option to back-up compounds for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) from Prosensa; GSK is partnered with the biotech on lead compound drisapersen, which failed in Phase III testing to treat DMD in September. Optimists are hoping its exon skipping technology has progressed since the first iteration and are looking for an effective DMD treatment among Prosensa’s back-up compounds, some of which GSK can option. Prosensa is the worst-performing 2013 IPO, down 72%.

GSK also has an anti-inflammatory and HCV deal with microRNAi company Regulus Therapeutics, initiated in 2008 and expanded in 2010; an anti-cancer stem cell antibody deal with OncoMed Pharmaceuticals that was for four candidate originally from 2007, but was cut down to two candidates in 2011; and a discovery deal with Five Prime Therapeutics for skeletal muscle diseases and muscle wasting targets and candidates that was originated in 2010 and expanded in 2011.

GSK has exercised its options at least twice, but both times candidates were returned. In 2010, it optioned Anacor Pharmaceuticals’ Gram-negative infection treatment and then subsequently returned it a few years later. That same year, it optioned Traficet-EN (now vercirnon) from ChemoCentryx. This September, GSK returned rights to the candidate for all indications. The pharma retained CCX354 for rheumatoid arthritis, which it also optioned. It may still option a third candidate under the 2006 deal.

Despite keeping a lot of options open, no one’s going anywhere fast. But we’re keeping our eyes on the road, moving ahead to all the latest deals (including loads of academic and discovery partnerships) in this edition of…

Salix/Santarus: The union of Salix Pharmaceuticals with Santarus creates a billion-dollar gastrointestinal specialty pharma that holds U.S. rights to fast-growing diabetes drug Glumetza (metformin extended release). Salix agreed Nov. 7 to pay $32 per share in cash for San Diego-based Santarus, valuing the company at $2.6 billion; its combined annual revenues would be about $1.3 billion based on their most recent quarterly performances. Salix has relied heavily on Xifaxan (rifaximin) for traveler’s diarrhea caused by Escherichia coli infections and hepatic encephelopathy; it produced $514.5 million in 2012 revenues, about 70% of the company’s total product sales. But it says the conjoined entity will be more diversified, with no drug accounting for more than half its revenues. Glumetza, a drug Santarus shares with Depomed, has delivered $131.4 million in revenue to Santarus in the first nine months of 2013. The buyout price represents a 37.8% premium over Santarus’s Nov. 7 closing price of $23.22. Raleigh, N.C.-based Salix had about $817 million in cash at the end of the third quarter, but intends to finance the deal with $1.95 billion in debt and a $150 million revolving credit facility from Jefferies Finance, as well as nearly all of its cash on hand. - Paul Bonanos

Roche/Polyphor: Switzerland-based Roche signed an exclusive global licensing deal to develop and commercialize Swiss biotech Polyphor's investigational antibiotic POL7080 against certain hospital-acquired superbug infections known as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, signaling Roche’s first foray back into antimicrobial development for three decades. Roche will pay up to CHF 500 million ($548 million) for the experimental antibiotic, which has only just entered Phase II testing, the companies said Nov. 4. The world’s largest maker of cancer drugs, which is trying to diversify into other disease areas, will make an upfront payment of CHF 35 million and milestone payments of up to CHF 465 million to the Swiss biotech. Roche said POL7080 belongs to a new class of antibiotics that kills P. aeruginosa, a bacterium found in hospitals and resistant to many antibiotic treatments, by a novel mode of action. It’s the first of a number of novel antibiotic candidate drugs being assembled by research and early development group pRED, which is now under the new leadership of John Reed and focusing on three main areas of unmet medical need: Hepatitis B, Influenza and Antibiotics. The pact with Polyphor is the first demonstration that Roche is back in antibiotics. In contrast, other Big Pharma companies have cut back, including former field leader Pfizer, which closed its antibiotic R&D center in Connecticut in 2011, as well as Bristol-Myers Squibb and Eli Lilly. AstraZeneca, GSK, and Merck remain active in the space. Privately-owned Polyphor discovers and develops macrocycle drugs intended as a complement to classical small molecules and large biopharmaceuticals. Although Polyphor, whose main shareholders are private individuals, doesn’t have any products on the market, its pact with Roche is its sixth deal since 2008. Its three drug candidates developed using its protein epitope mimetics (PEM) drug discovery technology are POL7080; POL6326, a CXCR4 antagonist currently in Phase II and ear-marked for several indications; and POL6014, an elastase inhibitor that’s in pre-clinical studies. PEMs are “medium-sized…, fully synthetic cyclic peptide-like molecules that mimic the two most relevant secondary structure patterns involved in Protein-Protein Interactions (PPIs),” according to the company’s Web site. It adds that they are “among the most potent and selective molecules known to modulate PPIs, GPCRs with large ligand-binding domains, and enzymes.” - Sten Stovall

Endo/Paladin: Endo Health Solutions’ new CEO Rajiv De Silva is making good on following in the footsteps of his former employer Valeant by conducting rapid-fire M&A that adds to the specialty pharma’s business. The Pennsylvania company announced Nov. 5 that it will acquire Montreal-based Paladin. The Canadian spec pharma has over 60 marketed products and will give Endo a jumping off point for building its business in Canada, Mexico, and South Africa. The $1.6 billion deal will be an almost all-stock transaction, with Endo paying CAD$77 ($73.70) per share for all outstanding shares of Paladin, a premium of 20% to Paladin’s share price of $63.91 on Nov. 4, the day before the deal was made public. Paladin shareholders will receive 1.6331 shares of the new company in stock and CAD$1.16 in cash, as well as one share of Knight Therapeutics, a new company. Knight will be spun-out of Paladin and be formed around Impavido (miltefosine), a treatment for the parasitic disease leishmaniasis. Impavido received a positive opinion from an FDA advisory committee in mid-October and has a PDUFA date of Dec. 18. Following the deal, the new company will be re-domiciled in Ireland in an effort to take advantage of a more favorable tax rate. Currently, Endo has a tax rate in the high-20% to 30% range. The new company will have a tax rate closer to 20%. - Lisa LaMotta

Pfizer/Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation: The Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation (JDRF) said Nov. 4 it would partner with Pfizer’s Centers for Therapeutic Innovation (CTI) to co-fund up to four jointly selected projects in the fields of immune tolerance, diabetic nephropathy and beta cell health. This is JDRF’s first corporate partnership since it announced a collaboration last year with Novo Nordisk, which will run out of the pharma’s Type 1 Diabetes R&D Center in Seattle. JDRF is the largest charitable supporter of type 1 diabetes R&D; it is currently sponsoring about $530 million worth of research, with $110 million in support last year. Pfizer’s CTI was established in 2010 to help further translational science; it hopes to get its first compound into the clinic this year and to bring two candidates into the clinic every year starting in 2014. CTI works with a network of 24 academic and medical institutions. Financial details of the deal were undisclosed. - Stacy Lawrence

Eisai/Arena: Eisai doubled down on Arena’s weight loss drug Belviq (lorcaserin) by expanding its commercialization rights to most of the world from much of North and South America. That’s despite slow sales in the drug’s first full quarter on the market – only $5.4 million. Insurers have been slow to start to reimburse for Belviq and Vivus’ Qsymia (phentermine/topiramate ER). Under the expanded deal, Arena will receive a $60 million upfront payment and up to $176.5 million in regulatory and development milestones. That’s an increase of $123 million from the milestone amount remaining under the prior agreement. Arena will continue to sell Belviq to Eisai for the U.S. and other North and South American territories for a purchase price of 31.5% and 30.75% of Eisai’s net sales in those regions, respectively. For Europe, China and Japan, Arena will receive 27.5% of Eisai’s net sales, while for all other territories the rate is 30.75%. These rates can increase on a tiered basis. Arena also stands to receive a one-time purchase price adjustment of $1.56 billion based on sales in the territories covered by an agreement; that’s an increase of $185 million from the prior deal. Eisai has exclusive commercialization rights in all countries worldwide, excluding South Korea, Taiwan, Australia, Israel and New Zealand. The partners expect also to investigate Belviq as a smoking cessation treatment. - S.L.

GSK/Various Academic Researchers: With a view to front-loading its pipeline, GSK has selected eight winners in its first Discovery Fast Track competition, designed to translate academic research into starting points for new potential medicines. The contest attracted 142 entries across 17 therapeutic areas from 70 universities, academic research institutions, clinics and hospitals in the US and Canada. The program gives certain researchers the opportunity to partner with GSK and jump-start their research into a development program. The winning projects deal with important unmet medical needs, including antibiotics resistance, diseases of the developing world, and certain cancers. The selected scientists will collaborate with GSK’s Discovery Partnerships with Academia (DPAc) team, the sponsor of the competition, to quickly screen and identify novel compounds to test their hypotheses. If advanced chemical testing is successful, the winning investigators could be offered a DPAc partnership to further refine molecules and assess their potential as novel new medicines. GSK devised the contest as a potential engine for accelerating input into its translational research operation, hoping to entice the brightest minds across North America with the promise of lending its potential to their discovery-stage programs. GSK and the academic partner share the risk and reward of innovation, where the U.K. drug maker funds activities in the partner laboratories, and provides in-kind resources to progress a program from an idea to a candidate medicine. Work on the winning Discovery Fast Track projects will begin immediately and the first screens are expected to be completed in mid-2014. - S.S.

Johnson & Johnson/ Evotec: Johnson & Johnson and Evotec are looking broadly, beyond the current focus on beta amyloid and Tau protein-based mechanisms, to identify new targets for Alzheimer’s disease. Under a collaboration announced on Nov. 8, the companies will seek to identify drug targets that could lead to entirely new approaches to treatment using Evotec’s TargetAD database. At best, the drugs in clinical trials today, if successful, will have modest efficacy for treating symptoms of mild-to-moderate patients, and “delay Alzheimer’s symptoms by a few weeks,” said Evotec’s Werner Lanthaler in an interview. The Janssen-Evotec partnership is much more ambitious than current efforts, both in its approach to how it achieves its goals and the goals themselves, he added. The database is derived from analysis of dysregulated genes in high-quality, well-characterized human brain tissues representing all stages of disease progression, Evotec said. It was built off of tissue contributions from The Netherlands Brain Bank and is “systematized, unbiased, and comprehensive,” said Lanthaler, explaining that by being unbiased, it is agnostic to whether the approach is ultimately an antibody, small molecule, or other kind of compound.  No other companies currently have access to the database, and Lanthaler was cagey in stating whether they would or its use would be exclusive to J&J. But he did say that J&J was the first company Evotec approached when it decided to look for licensees, and it jumped on the opportunity – perhaps in part because the companies have had a previous successful relationship in other therapeutic areas. Janssen will reimburse up to $10 million of full-time employee-based research costs and make preclinical, clinical, regulatory and commercial payments, capped at between $125 million and $145 million per program. Evotec will also be entitled to royalties from sales from any products that emerge from the collaboration. The deal runs for three years, and, on J&J’s side, is being conducted through its California Innovation Center. - Wendy Diller

(Thanks to Teslamotors.com for use of this image of our new Tesla S -- are you paying attention Santa??)

DOTW Wonders: Where Have the Private Biotech Take-Outs Gone?

We do like a nice, frothy biotech IPO market. But is it coming at the expense of stellar acquisitions of private biotechs? We miss the kind of M&A that got VCs boasting about multiples and sent ripples of excitement through the industry.

So, being the data geeks that we are, that sent us rifling through recent deals. Turns out that there have indeed been fewer decent-sized acquisition of private biotechs. This year there were only 16 worth more than $50 million, down from 26 at this time last year, according to Elsevier’s Strategic Transactions database.

And the really eye-popping deals are largely absent. Only three of this year’s private biotech acquisitions even had the biobuck-aided potential to be worth more than $500 million. Through October 2012, there were at least 10 take-outs that fit that description – although to be fair, a couple of those were of big, private specialty pharmas that were long-past any venture investment. And among this year’s biotech IPO class, 12 out of the 38 already have a market cap of more than $500 million.

Perhaps the longstanding truism that the best biotechs get bought and the rest go public has been turned on its head for a bit. Maybe IPO valuations are so rich that they’re driving up private company comps, giving potential strategic buyers pause.

There is one big biopharma buyer who’s been relentlessly active this year: AstraZeneca . It’s bought three private biotechs so far; all of them among the largest private acquisitions in 2013. Not that this comes as a huge surprise. DOTW wondered in January if then-new AstraZeneca CEO Pascal Soriot would go on a buying spree and expand into earlier stage deals.

Earlier this month, AstraZeneca bought antibody-drug conjugate oncology company Spirogen, which was in Phase II with its lead candidate, for $200 million upfront and up to $240 million in milestones. In August, it bought immune-stimulatory cancer company Amplimmune for $225 million upfront and up to $275 million in milestones.

In June, the big pharma made its biggest buy and the only private biotech acquisition this year potentially worth more than a billion when it acquired Pearl Therapeutics. Terms included $560 million upfront and up to $450 million in clinical and regulatory milestones, with an additional up to $140 million in sales-based milestones. (In total that’s up to $1.15 billion for those of you keeping score at home.) Pearl was a Phase III respiratory disease company.

While AstraZeneca is alone in its level of activity right now, recently industry’s larger companies have whole-heartedly embraced a deal structure that locks up promising early-stage assets at a reasonable price. This, of course, is the “exclusive option to acquire.” One big biopharma in particular has warmed to this approach – doing at least five of this kind of deal with private biotechs in the last couple of years. (Celgene, you know we’re talking about you.)

Celgene’s most recent option to acquire a private biotech was divulged earlier this month when it did a deal alongside a Series A round for PharmAkea Therapeutics, a small molecule cancer and fibrotic disease company that the biopharma seeded with funding last year. This time, Celgene paid $35 million for a three year discovery and development deal, and it also bought an undisclosed equity stake, alongside Bay City Capital, which invested $10 million. Celgene has an exclusive option to buy PharmAkea, which was founded by three execs from fibrotic disease play Amira Pharmaceuticals, which sold to Bristol-Myers Squibb for up to $475 million in 2011.

This week, a similar option-to-acquire deal together with a Series A came along. Sideris Pharmaceuticals garnered a partnership with Novartis worth up to $300 million, which includes the exclusive option to acquire the biotech. It also landed a $32 million Series A round from MPM Capital, Hatteras Venture Partners and Osage University Partners. Sideris is focused on developing drugs to treat transfusion-related iron overload; the partnership and the financing are intended to get its lead candidate through Phase II.

Novartis did another option-to-acquire deal alongside a Series A round with inflammatory and thrombotic diseases company Selexys Pharmaceuticals last year.

We see how an option-to-acquire deal alongside a Series A financing would be attractive. For big biopharmas, it sews up good-looking assets without fully committing, thereby providing more time to wait and see without risking losing out. For VCs, it lines-up a strong potential buyer and helps defray R&D costs from the outset in exchange for a known, possible outcome.  For biotechs, it greatly lessens financing risk, ties it close and early to a partner that can help define how it conducts its trials and gives it a built-in potential exit.

Plus, it takes the vagaries of the IPO and the M&A markets almost entirely out of the equation.  While companies and VCs risk losing out on the tantalizingly highest highs, they also can follow a known path to an exit. And while froth may be fun, it’s not at all stable.

What is entirely reliable is your DOTW team, who has yet again brought you a delightful sampling of this week’s heartiest deals. Quaff deeply of this week’s edition of  . . . .

Mesoblast/Intrexon/Ziopharm: Three partners – Mesoblast, Intrexon and Ziopharm Oncology – will be involved in an oncology drug discovery and development collaboration that could evolve into a joint venture, the firms announced Oct. 23. The initial deal is less of a commitment, however. Under the technology sharing arrangement, the partners will bring their respective expertise to the table to develop new treatments, with a first focus on lung cancer. The team will use Mesoblast’s Mesenchymal Lineage Cells and Intrexon’s RehoSwitch Therapeutic System (RTS) platform to co-develop complex transgene-enabled cell-based treatments. The resulting products should have both tumor targeting characteristics and controlled gene expression. Financial details were undisclosed. The deal is actually a 50/50 collaboration between Mesoblast and Ziopharm because Ziopharm is previously partnered with Intrexon on the technology to design and optimize therapeutic gene expression in the MLCS under a 2011 collaboration. - Jessica Merrill

deCODE/NextCODE: Like any classic Icelandic saga, the story of deCODE Genetics seems endless. The genetic diagnostics company has new life as NextCODE Health, with $15 million in Series A backing from Polaris Partners and ARCH Venture Partners. deCODE was a dot-com era high flier that aimed to mine blood samples from Iceland’s homogeneous population and meticulous record-keeping for clues to the genetic factors of disease. Following a $170 million IPO in 2000 deCODE spent a decade chasing the dream of developing its own drugs. It filed for bankruptcy in late 2009. A consortium of investors led by Polaris and ARCH, who were original deCODE investors and cashed out after the IPO, spent about $14 million to take deCODE private in 2010. Back at the helm, they did away with the drug-development ambitions and turned back to genetic research and diagnostics. They were rewarded when Amgen bought the recapitalized deCODE in 2012 for $415 million in cash up-front. Now, with Amgen focused on applying the deCODE technology to drug discovery, NextCODE has a five-year exclusive license to clinical diagnostics applications. The company says it already has contracts with clinical centers affiliated with Queensland Hospital in Australia, Boston Children’s Hospital in the U.S., Newcastle University in the UK, and Saitama University in Japan. Two top executives from the early days of deCODE, Hannes Smaranson and Jeff Gulcher, have returned to run the company as CEO and president/CSO, respectively. - Alex Lash

Amgen/Roche: As part of its international expansion and to shore up product revenues, Amgen reacquired rights from Roche to Neupogen (filgrastim) and Neulasta (pegfilgrastim) in about 100 markets for an undisclosed amount. Roche had held rights to the pair since 1989, under a license with Kirin-Amgen, a joint venture between Amgen and Kirin Holdings., in Eastern Europe, Latin America, Asia, the Middle East and Africa. Amgen is working toward building a presence in 75 countries and it will exceed that with this deal. In 2012, Neupogen and Neulasta generated about $200 million in sales in those territories. In the third quarter, Amgen reported $1.1 billion in Neulasta revenues and $466 million in Neupogen revenues. These were up 9% and 50%, respectively, from the same quarter during the prior year. (The big boost for Neupogen was entirely attributable to a $155 million order from the U.S. government during the quarter.) Both are used during chemotherapy to boost white blood cell count, thereby reducing the risk of infection for chemotherapy patients. The deal will become effective Jan.1, 2014. Amgen expects it will start to be accretive in 2014. In places where Amgen doesn’t have a presence, Roche or its distributors will continue to market products for an interim transition period. Kyowa Hakko Kirin will continue to market the drugs in some Asian territories, including China and Japan. - Stacy Lawrence

Alzheon/Bellus Health: A new neurodegenerative disease start-up is being built on the back of a failed Alzheimer’s disease compound. Start-up Alzheon has exclusively licensed a pro-drug of tramiprosate, ALZ-801, from Bellus Health, formerly Neurochem. Tramiprostate completed Phase III clinical testing in 2007 and the data were inconclusive. Alzheon plans to start a Phase II trial in Alzheimer’s disease patients, which it says will be aided by the clinical data and sub-population analyses from the more than 2,000 patients in Phase III studies of tramiprosate. The license includes rights to a family of analogs, along with an associated platform of chemotypes and clinical datasets. Alzheon expects this will provide the company with a drug development platform, as well as clinical and biomarker datasets in this patient population. Beyond ALZ-801, Alzheon expects to build a pipeline that includes additional prodrug candidates from this platform, as well as in-licensed programs.The idea is to take compounds that have demonstrated clinical proof-of-concept and apply improved clinical trial design, informed by existing patient sub-population data, more appropriate clinical endpoints and biomarkers. The newco will be led by Martin Tolar, who is its founder, president and CEO. He has previously headed biotechs including human genome interpretation system company Knome and cancer therapeutics play NormOxys Tolar was also chief business officer at Alzheimer’s-focused CoMentis, which licensed its lead beta-secretase inhibitor, then only in Phase I, to Astellas Pharma AS in 2008 $100 million up front. No financial details of the deal were disclosed; Alzheon hasn’t given any financing details yet. - S.L.

AstraZeneca/Evotec: AstraZeneca and the German drug discovery services company Evotec entered into an agreement Oct. 21 to discover novel targets and compounds with disease-modifying activity for the treatment of chronic renal disease, one of the key research areas for the restructured R&D efforts at the UK multinational. AstraZeneca will fund research on a series of molecules identified by Evotec in a program designed to explore a key mechanism of chronic kidney disease. In return, Evotec has received an undisclosed upfront payment and will receive clinical and regulatory milestones, and additional payments if products are commercialized. Renal diseases such as diabetic nephropathy, end-stage and chronic kidney disease are key targets within AstraZeneca's research effort into cardiovascular and metabolic diseases, one of three core areas for the company and based at its facilities in Molndal, Sweden. The agreement with Evotec comes just three months after AstraZeneca entered into a strategic collaboration with the private U.S. company FibroGen to develop and commercialize that company's FG-4592, a late-stage potential oral therapy for anemia in chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease in selected markets including China and the U.S. Evotec has a number of other big pharma collaborators for its drug discovery services, including with Roche and Boehringer Ingelheim, and a 2010 diabetes collaboration with AstraZeneca's biologics division, MedImmune, extended by the two companies at the start of 2013. - John Davis

Depomed/PDL: As it transforms from a research-oriented company to a product-focused one, Newark, Calif.-based Depomed is planning additional acquisitions to fortify its pain and neurology portfolio. Thanks to the $240.5 million sale of its type 2 diabetes royalties to PDL BioPharma, it will have plenty of cash to spend. Depomed sold milestone and royalty streams for marketed products and pre-approval compounds in the Oct. 21 deal. Most of the value currently lies in escalating royalties from Santarus’s sales of Glumetza (metformin HCL extended-release tablets), which generated $42.8 million in royalties during 2012 and $27.5 million during the first half of 2013. It also includes royalties from Merck’s sales of Janumet XR (sitagliptin and metformin), potential streams from investigational programs in the hands of Boehringer Ingelheim and Janssen Pharmaceuticals, and geographic royalties from LG Life Sciences in Korea and Valeant Pharmaceuticals  in Canada. Depomed built its own sales force to market Gralise (gabapentin) for shingles pain after it reacquired rights to the compound from Abbott Laboratories in 2011, and has since added pain drugs Zipsor (diclofenac potassium) and Lazanda (fentanyl) via acquisition. CEO Jim Schoeneck told conference call participants it would look to buy products already on the market or “those that are beyond clinical risk” at the registration stage. PDL once discovered antibodies, but now reaps royalties from license agreements based on its patents. The last of a key set of patents expires in 2014. If royalties from the new deal reach a total of $481 million, or twice the sale price, PCL and Depomed will split further royalties 50/50. - Paul Bonanos

Roche/Samsung: Samsung Group and Quintiles may have created their Samsung BioLogics joint venture primarily to develop and manufacture biosimilar drugs, but the Incheon, Korea-based drug factory operator is now striking new partnerships as a contract manufacturer for pharmas. An Oct. 22 deal with Roche calls for a long-term manufacturing partnership covering proprietary commercial biologics, which Samsung BioLogics will craft at two local facilities, one of which is still under construction. Financial terms weren’t disclosed and Roche didn’t reveal which medicines Samsung BioLogics will manufacture. It’s the second CMO deal since the summer for Samsung BioLogics, following a 10-year agreement with Bristol-Myers Squibb announced in July, covering an unnamed cancer antibody. Since the creation of Samsung BioLogics, Samsung forged a second JV with Biogen Idec in February 2012, creating Samsung Bioepis to develop biosimilars; it has since clarified that Samsung BioLogics will operate a CMO business while Samsung Bioepis will focus on biosimilars. - P.B.

(Thanks to Vault Brewing in Yardley, Penn. for use of their photo of a draft of Rye Pale Ale. It’s a favorite of EBI’s Chris Morrison – who hopes this mention will get him a free pint this weekend.)

Deals Of The Week Is Keeping Score – Valeant Wants Actavis, Which Covets Warner Chilcott …

Whether the pastime is baseball, Broadway or the daytime soaps, the old adage is that you can’t keep track of the players without a scorecard. The M&A front involving specialty pharma and generic drug makers has become similarly frenzied, as Canada’s acquisition-driven Valeant Pharmaceuticals sought after the newly minted Actavis, with Actavis then turning to a pursuit of Warner Chilcott once negotiations with Valeant broke down.

What, exactly, is going on here? And just as vitally, why?

Recall that the dust only recently settled on Actavis, the re-branded Watson Pharma, following the merger of those two firms last year. At an investor day presentation Jan. 25, CEO Paul Bisaro proclaimed that the new Actavis could boast a widened geographic footprint and a diversified portfolio comprising regular and branded generics, brand-name pharmaceuticals and over-the-counter products.

With the Watson/Actavis combination, the resulting company merely was trying to keep pace in a consolidating generics industry that had seen sector-leader Teva continually branching out into branded drugs and perhaps biosimilars and Mylan increasing its capabilities and geographic reach via a run of targeted deal-making.

In late April, reports surfaced that talks of a merger between Valeant and Actavis had collapsed, apparently due to Actavis shareholder concerns over valuation. Actavis has been a centerpiece of Wall Street discussion in recent months, due to a consistently rising share price. (Or has the conversation lifted the share price? A chicken vs. egg conundrum, to be sure.) The stock opened trading March 1 at $85.17, and rose to $92.33 on April 1 and to $105.24 on May 1. At the close of trading on May 16, Actavis’ stock price stood at $123.61.

Meanwhile, it was not necessarily clear who was the suitor in the Valeant/Actavis talks, although the safer bet seemed to be Valeant, helmed by acquisition-hungry CEO Michael Pearson. A Wall Street investment analyst said that the Valeant/Actavis talks seemed to be the catalyst for the resulting Actavis/Warner Chilcott rumors as well as possibly emerging interest in buying out Actavis from Mylan and from Novartis.

“We know that Valeant is an aggressive negotiator in terms of valuation,” the analyst said. “Going by their track record, they’re not going to pay some kind of excessive premium. The question we had was if nothing happened, did Valeant learn something really negative about Actavis during its due diligence?”
The analyst opined that the talks might have been a power-play by Bisaro himself, with the Actavis CEO picturing himself as the leader of a combined company with Valeant. “If Bisaro is talking with Pearson and trying to sell the business for $120 a share, isn’t he sending a signal that the game is up?,” asked our source. “Now, Bisaro might be saying Actavis is undervalued and going to do all these things, but his wallet is doing the talking. Actions speak louder than words, and they’re saying now is the time to pull the ripcord on the parachute.”

But if Valeant was the pursuer, Actavis’ current gambit for Warner Chilcott might have a “poison pill” element, an effort to make Actavis too rich for the Canadian specialty pharma to swallow. “It seems too coincidental that this happened so quickly after the Valeant story,” the analyst said.

In any event, the analyst perceives an Actavis/Warner Chilcott merger as highly likely, given how much the Irish firm has to lose if it puts itself up for sale and fails for a second year in a row. It would broaden Actavis’ portfolio in women’s health and dermatology and a strong sales force that could bolster Actavis’ commercial capabilities. What’s more, a reverse merger would domicile the resulting business in Ireland, providing tax advantages.

More elements were added to the story mid-week: Pittsburgh-based Mylan was reported to have made a roughly $15 billion offer to acquire Actavis, and then multinational pharma Novartis was said to be weighing its own bid. Novartis later publicly denied interest in Actavis, however. - Joseph Haas

The final chapters of that story remain to be written, but other biopharma deal-making has come to fruition in the latest installment of …

Elan/Theravance: In one of the more interesting deals of the past week, or for that matter the year, Elan announced a deal May 13 in which it agreed to pay Theravance $1 billion upfront in exchange for a portion of the potential future royalty payments it will receive from four respiratory programs partnered with Theravance. It’s a hefty up-front that many analysts believe exceeds the value of the interest Elan would acquire. The deal is the first of several Elan plans to make as it looks to reinvent the company through licensing and acquisitions. The announcement also comes as Elan looks to push back a hostile takeover bid from Royalty Pharma. Under Irish takeover law, the Theravance deal will require approval from investors, who already are considering an $11.25 per share buyout offer from Royalty. Elan would gain a 21% interest in potential future royalty payments to Theravance from GSK on four partnered respiratory drugs, including Breo Ellipta, which was approved by FDA May 10 for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. It also includes Anoro Ellipta, a combination of vilanterol with the LAMA umeclidinium, which is pending at FDA with a Dec. 18 user fee date, as well as in a bifunctional muscarinic antagonist-beta1 agonist (MABA) monotherapy and vilanterol monotherapy, both in development. For Theravance, the deal would have been hard to refuse given the rich terms, even though the company recently announced a separation to form one entity to manage the royalty revenue stream from Breo. Management said the arrangement will complement the company’s previously announced plan to separate into two companies. The firm said April 25 it will split into two entities, a royalty company called Royalty Management. Co. with a focus on near-term profitability and returning capital to shareholders, and Theravance Biopharma, a research-focused biopharmaceutical company. - Jessica Merrill

Alvine/AbbVie: On May 14, AbbVie signed its second deal since spinning out from parent company Abbott Laboratories in January, this time with San Carlos, Calif.-based biotech Alvine Pharmaceuticals. AbbVie agreed to pay $70 million upfront for an option to either acquire Alvine outright or license all of the assets related to its lead compound ALV003 for the treatment of celiac disease. The disease, which is characterized by gastrointestinal inflammation due to the ingestion of gluten-containing foods, affects about 3 million Americans and currently has no treatment options other than limiting gluten intake. ALV003 has completed a Phase IIa study and Alvine is prepared to take the drug through a 500-patient Phase IIb study, slated to read out in late 2014. Should AbbVie opt into the program, it will pay a “substantial” option fee, as well as further near-term milestone payments. The amount of those payments was not disclosed. The relationship between Alvine and AbbVie has a rich history; AbbVie’s venture arm (then Abbott Biotech Ventures) backed the biotech in May 2010 when it invested an undisclosed amount. AbbVie’s funds were an extension of Alvine’s Series A – the initial tranche was $21 million in 2006 led by Sofinnova Ventures with additional participation from Prospect Venture Partners, InterWest Partners, Cargill Ventures and Flagship Ventures. Another $21.5 million was raised when Panorama Capital and Black River Asset Management joined the syndicate in 2009. - Lisa LaMotta

RuiYi/Genor/CMC Biologics: China-U.S. hybrid RuiYi announced May 16 a series of partnerships to develop RYI-008, a novel anti-interleukin-6 monoclonal antibody in China to treat autoimmune disease and cancer. Formerly Anaphore, the hybrid is 90% a Chinese company, and about 10% U.S.-based, CEO Paul Grayson said. RuiYi conducts research at a facility in the Zhangjiang Hi-Tech Park in Pudong Shanghai, China, with only its executive management team based in offices in La Jolla, Calif. The antibody, in preclinical development now, will be developed first in China, and the company has forged a partnership with three other companies to get it there. China has said it would make biotech innovation a priority, but few companies have been bold enough to develop innovative biologics in the country, choosing instead to focus on biosimilars and generics for China, Grayson said. RYI-008, formerly ARGX-109, was in-licensed from Belgian/Dutch biotech arGEN-X in October 2012. RuiYi inked an exclusive licensing and co-development agreement with Shanghai-based Genor Biopharma to develop RYI-008 in China. Financial details of the deal were not disclosed. The company was chosen partly due to its close relationship with China FDA and its deep knowledge of China’s regulatory environment. Founded in 2007, Genor is focused on development and commercialization of therapeutic mAbs and Fc-fusion proteins. The company has more than 10 products in its pipeline, three of which are at IND and clinical stages. Danish contract manufacturer CMC Biologics will develop a cell line for RYI-008 for global manufacturing in all markets. Specific terms of the agreement were not disclosed. - Tamra Sami
Roche/Curie-Cancer: France’s Curie-Cancer and Roche announced May 15 that they are building upon a four-year partnership to expand their translational research programs and hasten development of new cancer treatments. In 2009, they agreed to partner around a preclinical research program which gave Roche access to a platform of preclinical models developed by the research teams at the Institut Curie. Curie-Cancer develops Institut Curie’s industry partnership activities. The Roche Institute for Research and Translational Medicine is the Swiss group’s arm there which aims to identify leading French academic research teams and build partnerships with them in areas of shared interest. The initial partnership gave Roche access to preclinical models that are highly representative of the tumors observed in patients. Using the platform, Roche determined in which sub-type of breast cancer an antibody was most effective. The Institut Curie also owns the Reverse Phase Protein Analysis platform, which gives researchers better understanding of how a Roche antibody works on the cancer cells at the molecular level, and also helps to identify predictive response markers. Curie-Cancer and Roche currently are working on a number of translational research programs involving Roche molecules that make use of the same technology. For example, a team of Curie-Cancer clinicians, anatomopathologists and researchers are working on developing a new Roche molecule targeting tumors. No financial details of the partnership were disclosed. - Sten Stovall

Quintiles/Merck Serono: Merck-Serono and newly public CRO Quintiles Transnational announced May 15 a five-year strategic collaboration that appears to go beyond the typical consolidation which the provider services industry’s larger pharmaceutical companies have pursued over the past few years. The deal, which the companies described as “first of its kind,” will create a drug-development engine by combining “expertise and experience” from the two organizations. Merck-Serono will lead strategically while Quintiles will handle the nuts and bolts of clinical trial planning and execution. In short, this is about more than saving money for Merck-Serono, a company that apparently is saving quite a bit these days. The mid-sized pharma’s parent company Merck KGAA reported May 14 during its quarterly earnings call that it was ahead of schedule in executing on its restructuring – which involved the closure of Merck-Serono’s Geneva headquarters – and that it would move forward its financial targets from 2014 to this year. Merck-Serono Executive VP and Global Head of Development and Medicine Annalisa Jenkins said that the partnership transcends the typical preferred-partnership outsourcing model. The deal moves beyond trading volume for “a better rate card,” she said. Quintiles has the benefit of seeing across different companies throughout industry, she said, and of integrating that knowledge, adding, “it’s remarkable that we don’t make a greater attempt to embrace and integrate that knowledge in how industry plans and executes studies.” The Merck-Serono/Quintiles tie-up does just that, she said, and “financially the incentives are set up to drive to more efficient decision making.” Specifics of the financials weren’t disclosed. The deal is Quintiles’ first since its public market debut May 8. The industry’s largest CRO and its existing investors sold more than 27 million shares combined at $40 apiece, raising about $950 million (Quintiles netted about $500 million). - Chris Morrison

AbbVie/Galapagos: AbbVie made further news May 17 when it and partner Galapagos announced that they will extend their 2012 collaboration centered on GLPG0634, a Phase II Janus kinase inhibitor, to development in Crohn’s disease. Under the revised agreement, the Belgian biotech will fund and complete a Phase II trial in Crohn’s, which should facilitate rapid progression into Phase III. AbbVie will pay Galapagos $50 million upon completion of the study, expected in mid-2015. Galapagos will initiate what is planned as a 20-week, Phase IIa/b study of ‘0634 in Crohn’s patients in early 2014, investigating for both disease remission and early maintenance of the drug’s beneficial effects. The study will be performed in parallel with a Phase IIb study in rheumatoid arthritis, pursuant to the agreement Galapagos signed with then Abbott Laboratories in February 2012. At the time, Abbott paid $150 million upfront with a commitment for $200 million more if the JAK inhibitor met pre-determined criteria in Phase II study in RA. - J.A.H.
Photo Credit: Wikimedia Commons

Alliance Deal of the Year Nominee: Tolero/Mannkind

It's time for the IN VIVO Blog's Fifth Annual Deal of the Year! competition. This year we're once again presenting awards in three categories to highlight the most interesting and creative deal making solutions of the year. The categories are: M&A Deal of the Year, Alliance Deal of the Year, and Exit/Financing Deal of the Year. We'll supply the nominations (a half dozen in each category throughout December) and you, the voting public, will decide the winners (by voting early and often, commencing once we've announced all the nominees). Strap yourselves in, it's The Race for the Roger™.

When is a licensing deal, well, not exactly a licensing deal? How about a deal in which the out-licensor can opt back in to the program being sold off, with the related “bio-bucks” then flowing in the opposite direction – that is, to the company that in-licensed the assets in the first place?

In a deal structure that perhaps could best be described as “double-jointed,” in April new company Tolero Pharmaceuticals licensed exclusive worldwide rights to MannKind Corp.’s preclinical Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor program, which Tolero believes could yield novel therapies for hematological cancers and inflammatory diseases. We think the deal could yield the companies this year's Roger in the alliance category.

MannKind, of course, is focused almost exclusively on its perennially troubled effort to develop a recombinant inhaled insulin product, Afrezza. The deal with Tolero puts development of the BTK compounds in the hands of the privately held, Utah-based biotech, but allows MannKind the ability to opt back in after Phase I if it likes what Tolero has uncovered. If MannKind opts back in to develop the compounds, the potential milestones and royalties would flow instead to Tolero.

“It’s a different model that we proposed and one that I think MannKind really liked,” Tolero Chairman and CEO Dallin Anderson told “The Pink Sheet” DAILY at the time. “It aligned incentives and made our negotiation progress very smooth. I think us proposing a structure that de-risked the opportunity for MannKind and gave them a chance to still be involved down the road helped us with not only terms but also to get to an agreement that makes sense for both parties.”

Tolero paid an undisclosed upfront amount with the potential for development, approval and commercialization milestones going to MannKind, along with tiered royalties on any product sales. The upfront and milestones could total $130 million, Anderson said. However, MannKind also retains the right to re-acquire the BTK assets at pre-specified terms up to 60 days after the conclusion of Tolero’s first Phase I study. If MannKind elects this option, it would assume all development and commercialization responsibilities and costs.

“BTK currently represents one of the most exciting therapeutic targets in oncology, and we feel that our collaborative approach to targeting BTK may uncover some novel utilities not yet fully realized,” Anderson said. He did not elaborate, however, on what those additional “utilities” might be.

Much about Tolero remains unknown – founded in 2011 and based in Salt Lake City, the firm is not backed by venture capital or institutional investors. Anderson, who noted his background as having co-founded Montigen Pharmaceuticals Inc. in 2003 and then selling to SuperGen in 2006 at a significant multiple, would say only that his company is funded by a number of private investors. Its own programs, including two compounds – TP-0413 for cancer-related anemia and TP-0829 for B-cell malignancies – are slated to enter clinical development in the next year and derive from a discovery approach based upon single genetic alterations that drive cellular signaling pathway abnormalities.

--Joseph Haas

image from flickrer flightofdestiny2008, creative commons license

Deals of the Year Exit/Financing Nominee: Warp Drive Bio

It's time for the IN VIVO Blog's Fifth Annual Deal of the Year! competition. We're once again presenting awards in three categories to highlight the most interesting and creative deal making solutions of the year. The categories are M&A Deal of the Year, Alliance Deal of the Year, and Exit/Financing Deal of the Year. We'll supply a half dozen nominations in each category throughout December and you, the voting public, will decide the winners by voting early and often, commencing once we've announced all the nominees. Strap yourselves in, it's The Race for the Roger™.

 

No life science venture firm makes more blockbuster early-stage investments than Third Rock Ventures, often without syndicate partners. But the bicoastal firm opened 2012 with a twist on its typical modus operandi when it unveiled Warp Drive Bio in early January.

Warp Drive itself is a new approach to an old concept. The firm is using new computational technology to find the basis of new drugs in natural products -- or if you prefer, pharmacognosy -- once the main hunting ground for the pharmaceutical industry but left behind in the era of high-throughput screening of vast libraries of synthetic compounds. Warp Drive is building what it calls a genomic search engine to comb through all accessible bacterial genomes and look for conserved chemical structures that signal underlying gene expression with “novel and profound biological effects” and higher potential of drug-like properties. The firm calls these structures “chemomemes” – a term coined in an early Warp Drive meeting by scientific advisor Rick Klausner, a former National Cancer Institute chief and current VC at The Column Group (which is not a Warp Drive investor).

CEO Alexis Borisy reckons his team has sequenced “more microbial genomes than the rest of the planet a couple times over just this year alone,” and has moved on to step two: searching through the digitized genomes, more than 40,000 so far, for chemomemes that point the way to potential drugs. “We don’t tell anyone what we’re looking for,” says Borisy. “It’s a closely guarded secret. We think it’ll cause a lot of people to go ‘Wow.’”

Hello? Any drugs here?

Borisy thinks Warp Drive will be ready to unveil the secret in scientific papers a year or so from now. For now, he says the proof of concept is working; the team has already put searches to the test and gotten “hits,” to use search-engine parlance. The firm will stick to bacteria, which dominate every corner of the planet, and will later investigate fungi. Plants are much more difficult, says Borisy.

The total for the round was tabbed at $125 million, 60 percent of which was equity. As the lead investor, Third Rock wanted not only to build a syndicate to spread the investment risk but also find a potential buyer who could guarantee a healthy return. With that in mind, Third Rock recruited two others for the Series A: Sanofi and Greylock Partners. Sanofi’s involvement is where the deal twist comes in. The multinational pharma company, with an undisclosed equity stake, also has an option to buy Warp Drive. It’s a two-way street, in fact: The investors can force a sale to Sanofi if Warp Drive hits certain goals. The strike prices for each side are pre-determined but undisclosed, as are the milestones that would trigger the put and call sales.

Sanofi receives the chance to collaborate on early-stage research and feed its pipeline, while Warp Drive gets cash to develop its platform and form a drug pipeline of its own. Under the Sanofi collaboration, the sides would like to get at least two drugs into the clinic within the next five years.

Third Rock had already incubated Warp Drive Bio for “a couple of years,” according to Borisy, when conversations with Sanofi began in mid-2011. Warp Drive Bio was built around the ideas of Harvard University professor (and Third Rock partner) Greg Verdine. Harvard University genetics professor George Church, and the University of California, San Francisco pharmaceutical sciences professor James Wells are co-founders. 

The plan upon unveiling was to spend 2012 building the platform, then spend the next couple of years building a pipeline, going after previously undruggable targets. Borisy says the firm is ahead of schedule and has already triggered some of the equity and non-equity milestones with its build-out and its early chemomeme search activities. Warp Drive should grow from its current dozen staffers to about 40 next year.

The Warp Drive deal kicked off another year of Series A activity for Third Rock. It has since funded, either solo or with syndicate partners, the companies Alcresta (nutritional supplements), Global Blood Therapeutics (blood disorders), Myokardia (allosteric modulators for cardiovascular defects) and Cibiem (carotid body modulation device).-- Alex Lash

Photo of Yellowstone extremeophiles courtesy of flickr user Tim Pearce.

Deals of the Week Takes Time to Travel

Like any conscientious time traveller, a biopharma needs to tread carefully around iterations of its current, past and future deal-making self. (Spoiler alert!) In the new sci-fi flick Looper, the younger version of Bruce Willis does a terrible job cultivating his present while tending to his future and reconciling himself to his past. But this week Celgene proved a bit more adept than the action hero at tending to its past and future self. The biotech bellwether disclosed a pair of early stage deals, while putting out positive data that helps justify its largest acquisition to date.

The biotech added two cancer deals, one to develop a Phase I immunotherapy with VentiRx and the other a research partnership with the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society (LLS). Celgene has now disclosed six partnerships this year, the most since 2007 when it inked 10.

Celgene will pay VentiRx $35 million upfront to develop Toll-like receptor 8 (TLR8) agonist, VTX-2337, in cancer indications. The two companies will advance the compound in a pair of Phase II trials in ovarian and head-and-neck cancer over the next few years under an exclusive, worldwide partnership. Celgene also gains an option to purchase the company. VentiRx is eligible to receive additional funding during the option period, including a potential equity investment by Celgene.

In-licensed from Array BioPharma in 2007, ‘2337 is an immunotherapy that directly activates human myeloid dendritic cells, monocytes and natural killer cells to produce high levels of mediators which orchestrate the integration of a patient’s innate and adaptive anti-tumor responses, according to VentiRx.

Celgene included a similar option to purchase in its deal late last year with genomics start-up Quanticel, which got $45 million upfront and sold an undisclosed amount of equity to Celgene. The biopharma gained exclusive third-party rights to Quanticel's platform, which conducts single-cell genomic analysis of tumor samples.

Likely even more long range than the VentiRx deal, the LLS partnership seeks to identify and fund blood cancer research projects. The idea is to use the patient advocacy group’s connections with academic research centers to advance the scientific and medical understanding of hematological malignancies. The partners will also work with biotech companies to help develop of novel treatments for blood cancer.

Defining its present and past, Celgene also helped make the case this week for its $2.9 billion acquisition of Abraxis BioScience, which was met with skepticism when announced in 2010, with the disclosure of positive Phase III data for Abraxane in melanoma. The company’s share price climbed nearly to $80 on the news. That’s close to its 52-week high, but Celgene still hasn’t broken out of the roughly $50-$80 range it’s been in for about six years.

Now that Abraxane has hit some milestones and has a slew of upcoming catalysts Celgene may not wish it could go back in time to undo the deal, although there were plenty of investors who wished it could do so in the deal’s aftermath.

Abraxane (paclitaxel protein-bound particles for intravenous suspension) has an Oct. 12 PDUFA date for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). An approval in NSCLS would be the first new indication for the drug since Celgene acquired Abraxis. At the time, Abraxane was already approved as a second-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer.

If it can successfully add NSCLC, along with melanoma and pancreatic cancers, Celgene is expected to build Abraxane into its next blockbuster franchise. Just modelling sales for second-line breast cancer and NSCLC, Jefferies analyst Thomas Wei expects Abraxane could hit more than $1 billion in sales by 2016 or 2017.

Still, Abraxane may be little help when it comes to Celgene’s long-term patent issues. The drug comes off patent in the U.S. next year, but newly approved indications would have five to seven years of protection, said ISI Group’s Mark Schoenebaum in a note this week. He expects Abraxane IP to hold up through 2020 in the U.S. Revlimid (lenalidomide) starts losing IP protection as early as 2019; it accounted for two-thirds of Celgene’s $4.7 billion in net product sales last year.

But as sci-fi aficionados know, when time travel is involved current and future selves often end up at odds, if not at outright war. Celgene needs to hit a lot of milestones including next week’s Abraxane PDUFA date and Phase III pancreatic data for the drug this quarter.

Celgene isn’t the only one working to get a glimpse of a rosier future. See who else is partnering up to do so in this week’s installment of . . .

Sanofi/Genfar: Sanofi chief executive Chris Viehbacher seems as good as his word when it comes acquisitions. Three weeks after identifying Colombia as an attractive emerging market to be in, he bagged the country’s second-biggest generics maker, Genfar. While in China last month at the World Economic Forum, Viehbacher identified Colombia, Vietnam and Indonesia as emerging markets that look attractive in terms of growth. On Oct. 2 Sanofi announced it was buying Genfar, which had total sales last year of $133 million, some 30% of that from outside Columbia. The purchase builds on Sanofi’s previous forays into Latin America comprising the $662 million purchase of Medley Pharmaceuticals, the big Brazilian generics maker, in April 2009, just days after the French company bought Mexico's Kendrick Farmaceutica. Genfar does business in Venezuela, Peru, Ecuador and 10 other countries. No financial terms were announced. Viehbacher has been diversifying the group since he took control in 2008 by acquiring small or mid-sized companies in areas including vaccines, over-the counter drugs and generics, especially in fast-growing emerging markets, such as Eastern Europe, Latin America and Asia. So, does the Genfar purchase mean Viehbacher – who has said Sanofi is open to “bolt-on” transactions of as much as €2 billion ($2.6 billion) this year – will soon announce deals in Vietnam and Indonesia? It would seem a safe bet. – Sten Stovall

Janssen/Astellas: J&J-owned Janssen Biotech beefed up its autoimmune pipeline by acquiring rights to Phase II Janus kinase inhibitor ASP015K from Astellas Pharma. Horsham, PA-based Janssen paid $65 million up-front in the Oct. 1 deal, which also includes development, regulatory and commercial milestones that could add $880 million to its value. Janssen would also pay double-digit royalties if the drug is commercialized. The deal covers the entire world except for Japan, where Astellas retains rights. Astellas has already conducted a Phase IIa study of the drug in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis patients, and will complete three Phase IIb trials already underway in rheumatoid arthritis. Janssen will assume all further development costs outside Japan after those studies are completed. The drug could be an eventual successor to Janssen’s top-selling Remicade (infliximab) and Simponi (golimumab), both of which are approved in RA, psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis. No JAK inhibitor has yet been approved for rheumatoid arthritis, but FDA is soon expected to rule on Pfizer’s tofacitinib, with a PDUFA date of Nov. 21. – Paul Bonanos

Takeda/LigoCyte: The Japanese pharma is making good on its commitment to make vaccines a priority. Takeda will acquire vaccine play LigoCyte for an upfront payment of $60 million, with additional undisclosed contingent development payments. Late last year, Takeda announced the establishment of a Vaccine Business Division. To run the new division, Takeda hired the former director of vaccine delivery in the Global Health Program at the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Rajeev Venkayya. Prior to the Gates Foundation, Venkayya was the special assistant to the President for Biodefense at the White House. With the Ligocyte acquisition, Takeda will gain a Phase I/II vaccine to prevent norovirus gastroenteritis, the only norovirus vaccine in clinical trials, according to the company. Novovirus is the most common cause of gastroenteritis and food-borne illness in the U.S. and the cause of about 200,000 deaths annually, mostly in developing countries. The norovirus vaccine uses LigoCytes proprietary vaccine-like particle (VLP) technology. Takeda will also gain LigoCyte’s preclinical vaccines against respiratory syncytial virus, influenza and rotavirus. LigoCyte management will join Takeda’ Vaccine Business Division and continue to operate in Bozeman, Montana. - Stacy Lawrence 

Evotec/Bayer: Two European pharmas forged a multi-target alliance to develop clinical candidates to treat endometriosis. Bayer Pharma paid €12 million ($15.5 million) up-front to enter a five-year collaboration with Hamburg-based Evotec, with a goal of discovering up to three clinical candidates and jointly bringing them through preclinical research. Bayer will assume development costs related to the drugs upon their entry into the clinic, and could owe Evotec up to €580 million in preclinical, regulatory, clinical and commercial milestone payments, plus low-double-digit sales royalties, if the drugs advance and are commercialized. Bayer already markets Visanne (dienogest), a once-daily oral tablet that treats pain and lesions associated with the disorder, as well as a variety of other women’s health products including contraceptives. Endometriosis, which most frequently afflicts women between 25 and 35, is said to affect 176 million women worldwide, including about 10 percent of women of reproductive age. – P.B.

Servier/Ethical Oncology Science: French drug maker Servier is again moving to bolster its oncology pipeline through a deal with the Italian biopharma Ethical Oncology Science, its second in-licensing deal in as many weeks. In the latest agreement, Servier has acquired rights to an early clinical-stage antitumor drug targeting Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 1 and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 1-3, the company announced Oct. 1. In exchange Servier will pay €45 million ($57.5 million) upfront for rights outside the U.S., Japan and China. In those territories, EOS will retain rights. EOS also stands to receive clinical and registration milestones as well as royalties. The focus of the development of the drug will be mainly on breast cancer, where it has demonstrated promising results in early human trials, according to the company. In an earlier deal, announced Sept. 20, Servier partnered with MacroGenics Inc. for an option to develop and commercialize Dual-Affinity Re-Targeting (DART) products from its bi-specific antibody platform directed at three undisclosed tumor targets. Servier paid $20 million upfront for an option to obtain licensing rights in markets outside the U.S., Canada, Mexico, Japan, Korea and India. - Jessica Merrill

Leo Pharma/Charité: The Charité, which started out in the 1700s as a plague hospital for the poor but now incorporates Berlin's university hospitals, one of the largest medical organizations in Europe, is to collaborate with Denmark's mid-sized company, Leo Pharma, to discover and develop new treatment options for patients with skin conditions like psoriasis and actinic keratosis. It’s a bold step for Leo Pharma, which has previously not been particularly active in forging scientific collaborations, and can be viewed as the next move in the company's quest to search for future growth opportunities. The partners will test treatment solutions that no one has explored before, and identify new therapeutic areas within dermatology for Leo Pharma, the company announced Oct. 3. The collaboration is billed as the first of five long-term research relationships that Leo Pharma wants to set up with external partners in four countries – the U.S., Germany, France and Australia - by the end of next year. The research will supplement Leo Pharma's own internal R&D activities.- John Davis

Theravance/Alfa Wassermann: Mid-sized Italian company Alfa Wassermann is continuing to focus its research on all things gastrointestinal by collaborating with San Francisco-based Theravance on the development of that company's Phase II 5HT4-agonist, velusetrag (TD-5108), in gastroparesis. There are few therapeutic options for the disorder, which is characterized by delayed gastric emptying leading to bloating, nausea and vomiting. Velusetrag has already shown significant prokinetic activity after once-daily dosing in 400 patients with chronic idiopathic constipation. Under the agreement, Alfa Wassermann will fund the velusetrag research program in gastroparesis until the end of Phase II, and at that point will have an exclusive option to license the product for further development and commercialization in the EU, Russia, China, Mexico and certain other countries. Theravance will retain full rights to velusetrag for the U.S., Canada, Japan, and certain additional countries. If Alfa Wassermann exercises the option, Theravance will receive a $10 million fee and could receive further development, regulatory and sales milestone payments totalling up to $53.5 million, the two companies announced Oct. 2. Theravance could also receive royalties on net sales ranging from the low teens to 20%. Alfa Wassermann, a private Bologna-based company with revenue of €335 million ($434 million) in 2011, is best known for its gut-selective antibiotic, Xifaxan (rifaximin), which is marketed in more than 30 countries. It also markets a low molecular heparin, Fluxum (parnaparin), and a heparinoid, Vessel (sulodexide), and has ambitions to extend its direct presence in the EU and emerging markets. Theravance markets the injectable antibiotic, Vibativ (telavancin) in the U.S., and is collaborating with GlaxoSmithKline on the development of a combination COPD product which has completed Phase III clinical studies.- J.D.

BioSante/ANI Pharmaceuticals: In perhaps a last-ditch effort to derive value from development-challenged, female sexual-dysfunction drug LibiGel (transdermal testosterone gel), BioSante is undertaking a reverse-merger with specialty branded and generic pharmaceutical company ANI Pharmaceuticals. Each company’s board of directors has approved the proposed all-stock transaction in which ANI shareholders would end up owning 53% of the combined company and BioSante shareholders the remaining 47%. The deal, announced Oct. 4, also includes a contingent value right tied to the potential sale, transfer or licensing of LibiGel that could yield up to $40 million for existing BioSante shareholders. After Phase III trial data were clouded by a higher-than-expected placebo response, BioSante was left to design new pivotal studies for LibiGel, intended to address female hypoactive sexual disorder, that would ameliorate the placebo effect. In July 2011, the Illinois-based firm raised $45.1 million in a follow-on public offering, selling 16 million shares at $3 per share to fund continued development of LibiGel. The new company will be called ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc., with existing ANI President and CEO Arthur Przybyl at the helm. Przybyl also will hold a seat on the board of directors, along with four current ANI directors and two from BioSante. The new company will seek to out-license LibiGel and put BioSante’s cash toward ANI’s niche branded and generic drug business, which generated net sales of $16 million in 2011. BioSante also brings a pipeline of cancer vaccines being investigated in 17 Phase I and Phase II trials to the new entity, while ANI has a contract manufacturing organization. - Joseph Haas

Flashing back to 5AM? Trippy alarm photo courtesy of loopoboy 2.0.