There is plenty of interest in industry in the question of who, exactly, will be overseeing the launch of a new federal comparative effectiveness research effort in the US.
Under the health care reform law, that effort will be overseen by a public/private partnership called the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.
With the June 30 nomination deadline past, it turns out that the pharmaceutical industry's two biggest trade associations--the Biotechnology Industry Organization and the Pharmaceutical Research & Manufacturers of America--are on more-or-less the same page when it comes to who should serve.
As we report in "The Pink Sheet" DAILY, BIO and PhRMA each nominated the same four candidates, with BIO's slate including two additional choices to serve on the board of governors of PCORI.
Of course, they won't all get seats: by law, PCORI will have three industry reps, and they are supposed to represent the pharmaceutical, biotech and device sectors. So figure on two of the six PhRMA/BIO nominees actually getting seats.
The choice, incidentally, is to be made by the Comptroller General of the US, otherwise known as the head of the Government Accountability Office. That is currently Gene Dodaro, who has been acting CG since David Walker stepped down in March 2008. Congress is supposed to send a bipartisan list of nominees to the President for selection of a successor--but Congress couldn't agree on a list and now it isn't clear when or if Obama will pick a permanent head. That should make everyone in BIO and PhRMA proud that they were able to agree on a relatively short list of nominees.
Settling on the industry reps will be fun, but there is an even more interesting choice to be made in rounding out the board of governors.
PCORI's 19 member board has only four slots reserved for government officials, and two of those are filled by statute (National Institutes of Health Director Francis Collins and Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality Administrator Carolyn Clancy). That leaves only two open slots for the board--and way more than two interested government agencies.
Remember: the Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Resarch that was formed a year ago had 15 representatives, all from government. The FCC was dissolved upon enactment of the health care reform law. That means that when the music stops, 11 members of that team will not have seats on the PCORI board.
Who gets the two vacant seats for government agencies? Easy. The Food & Drug Administration and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, right?
Not so fast. We are hearing that the Department of Veteran's Affairs is sure to take one of the slots. That may not be intuitively obvious to us regulatory-centric types, but it is perfectly logical: VA operates a massive, fully integrated health care system and claims to have pioneered the field of CER.
So that leaves one slot open, and 10 people still standing. Should be an interesting choice....
Friday, July 02, 2010
Musical Chairs on CER: Industry Picks in Tune, But Who Will Represent Government?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment