Deals Of The Week: UCSF Catalyzes R&D Tech-Transfer Deals With Private Sector

Neither MedImmune, the biologics arm of AstraZeneca, nor the University of California, San Francisco, is a stranger to R&D collaboration between private industry and academia, but the agreement they signed on Feb. 11 is somewhat unique in that it will take advantage of a UCSF program that was intended to provide external expertise that might help to move basic research into more advanced stages.

At UCSF’s Clinical and Translational Science Institute, the Catalyst Awards program benefits from the input of industry and academic advisors who review burgeoning science and help select which projects should advance further and be given increased resources. CTSI oversees UCSF researchers working on therapeutics, devices, diagnostics and digital health applications, explained June Lee, director of early translational research at CTSI.

The Catalyst program started with about 120 advisors, and now has about 140 and is growing in numbers. “These folks are from all different disciplines, mostly from industry, and represent various different sectors and areas of expertise for product development in the life sciences,” Lee said. According to her, it’s more of a happy coincidence than a plan that the Catalyst Awards program spurred a broad-based partnership – considering both small- and large-molecule projects in cardiovascular and metabolic disease, oncology, respiratory, inflammation and autoimmune disorders, neuroscience and infectious disease – with MedImmune.

The collaboration could end up bringing early-stage assets to MedImmune (or AstraZeneca) in any of those areas, Lee added, since UCSF has 2,400 faculty, of whom about 1,300 are doing research primarily. “Our people are working in all areas of research, and that’s not accounting for post-docs or graduate students,” she said.

“Our primary goal was to enable and support of early-stage technology projects at UCSF,” she said. “For things that have product potential, we bring in the necessary expertise to help the faculty move projects along. Even though spurring deal-making may not have been our primary purpose, the program really is a very appropriate portal for people on the outside to look through to determine which university technologies are most ready to be licensed out.”

Terms have not been disclosed for the MedImmune/UCSF tie-up but Senior VP and Head of the Respiratory, Inflammation and Autoimmune Innovative Medicines Unit (iMED) Bing Yao said that unlike the Johns Hopkins and University of Maryland, Baltimore arrangements signed last year, which feature an overall R&D funding allocation, funding for this partnership will be determined on a case-by-case basis.

“Some of the programs, we will want to bring to the next stage – they could be preclinical or [we could want to move them] further into clinical development,” Yao noted. “This way, we can give a lot of input. As a company developing products for multiple therapeutic areas, we can bring our expertise to facilitate [the projects] but each program will be unique.”

The agreement extends for three years, with an option to extend it. MedImmune and AstraZeneca personnel will join with the Catalyst Awards advisors and UCSF staff to determine which products move forward with MedImmune/AstraZeneca backing. And the company will have exclusive options rights to the programs it backs, Yao said.

In the six months, Gaithersburg, Md.-based MedImmune has shored up its local base by signing a five-year, $6.5 million, broad-based R&D partnership with Johns Hopkins University in December and a five-year, $6 million pact with University of Maryland, Baltimore in September. It also has R&D relationships with academia in the U.K. and, now, with the UCSF partnership, gets better access to technological advances stemming from the biotechnology hub in the San Francisco bay area, Yao told Deals of the Week.

UCSF, meanwhile, is one of five founding members of the Academic Drug Discovery Consortium, founded in 2012 to serve as a clearinghouse for both academia and industry on research underway within U.S. and international drug research programs. Since 2010, UCSF has negotiated research collaborations with Genentech, Pfizer, Sanofi and Bayer, while licensing a preclinical antibody for organ failure to Stromedix and genetic encoding intellectual property for Parkinson’s disease to uniQure.

While that agreement was signed, other M&A and licensing activity was heating up the cold and snowy winter. Read on for the rest of ....

Mallinckrodt/Cadence: Mallinckrodt will have a lot of work to do to make good on the $1.3 billion it’s paying for Cadence Pharmaceuticals, a price more than 10 times the projected 2013 sales for Cadence’s sole product, Ofirmev (intravenous acetaminophen). Mallinckrodt says the acquisition gives it a third therapeutics platform, in the hospital setting, in addition to its existing focus on generic drugs and pain medications. The specialty drug company plans to keep Cadence’s sales and marketing capabilities and acquire additional hospital products to sell through them. Mallinckrodt announced the acquisition Feb. 11, its first major transaction since it was spun-out from medical device and supply company Covidien in July. Ofirmev launched in January 2011 and is approved to treat mild-to-moderate pain, for the management of moderate-to-severe pain with adjunctive opioid analgesics, and for the reduction of fever. It has expected net product revenues of $110.5 million for 2013. That’s more than twice the $50.1 million posted in 2012, its first full year of sales. As of Sept. 30, Cadence shareholders included Fidelity Management (7.6 million shares), T. Rowe Price Associates (7.2 million), Capital Research (7.1 million), Wellington Management (6 million), The Vanguard Group (3.4 million), NEA (2.1 million) and BlackRock (1.9 million). Mallinckrodt will pay $14 per share for Cadence, a 32% premium to the trailing 30-trading-day volume weighted average price; in 2006, the company completed an IPO at $9 per share with a valuation of about $250 million. That gives shareholders who bought and held IPO shares a roughly 1.5x return. - Stacy Lawrence and Jessica Merrill

Pierre Fabre/Aurigene: Pierre Fabre Group, the French pharmaceuticals and cosmetics firm whose sales are split almost equally between drugs and skincare cosmetics, has acquired worldwide development and commercialization rights (excluding India) to a novel immune checkpoint modulator, AUNP-12, from the Indian drug-discovery firm Aurigene Discovery Technologies. AUNP-12 is the only peptide under development as a PD-1 immune modulator, the companies say. The candidate could be associated with greater efficacy and fewer side effects when used as part of combination therapies, they announced Feb. 12. The peptide achieves effective levels in vivo after subcutaneous dosing, and has inhibited tumor growth and metastasis in preclinical models of cancer. Aurigene, the Bangalore-based biotech that has collaborated with six of the top 10 pharmaceutical companies since its inception in 2002, will receive an undisclosed upfront payment from Pierre Fabre, and milestone payments based on development, regulatory and commercial progress. The deal terms are in line with others in this space, the companies said. It’s also the first major deal the French company has signed since the death of its founder, Pierre Fabre, in the middle of last year. Pierre Fabre specializes in the development of anti-cancer drugs, either alone or with partners; with marketed drugs that include Javlor (vinflunine) and Navelbine (vinorelbine), while Aurigene is a profitable Indian biotech that generates lead compounds and progresses them to preclinical development in concert with collaborators, particularly in oncology and inflammation. - John Davis

Retrophin/Manchester: Retrophin, which netted $37.4 million in an initial public offering in January, has arranged to purchase privately held Manchester Pharmaceuticals for $62.5 million, including $29.5 million upfront. Announced Feb. 12, the transaction is expected to close on March 1, Retrophin said. Like Retrophin, Manchester focuses on rare diseases. The Ft. Collins, Colo.-based firm has two FDA-approved drugs in its portfolio – Chenodal (chenodeoxycholic acid), which is indicated for patients suffering from gallstones in whom surgery poses an unacceptable health risk due to disease or advanced age, and Vecamyl (mecamylamine HCI tablets), indicated for the management of moderately severe to severe essential hypertension and uncomplicated cases of malignant hypertension. Retrophin said it also will seek quick FDA approval for Chenodal, the only FDA-approved chenodeoxycholic acid, for cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis (CTX), a rare metabolic disorder that can cause severe intellectual disability or even prove fatal in young patients. The New York firm also guided that it anticipates revenue of between $10 million and $12 million this year overall, and $19 million to $21 million in 2015. - Joseph Haas

Debiopharm/Affinium: Swiss biopharma Debiopharm Group broadened its antibiotic portfolio by acquiring key assets from Toronto-based Affinium Pharmaceuticals on Feb. 11. The deal includes two narrow-spectrum anti-bacterial candidates, the Phase IIa FabI inhibitor AFN-1252 and its Phase I prodrug, AFN-1720. Debiopharm also acquired Affinium’s technology platform with which it created the two drugs. Terms of the arrangement weren’t disclosed. Affinium says its drugs represent a new class of antibiotics that inhibit the type-II fatty acid synthesis pathway, known as FAS-II, essential for bacterial growth. Its compounds have shown promise in combating staphylococcus infections, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-intermedia Staphylococcus aureus infections, while allowing intravenous-to-oral switching for patients leaving hospital care. Debiopharm expects to develop a companion diagnostic to select appropriate patients as AFN-1720 progresses through the clinic. Debiopharm entered the anti-bacterial field last fall, when it struck a deal with India’s TCG Life Sciences to develop new antibiotics. The company is aiming to develop drugs that preserve existing gut flora while overcoming resistance to broad-spectrum drugs. Affinium raised $33 million in two rounds of funding in 2007 and 2011, from investors including SV Life Sciences, Genesys Capital Partners, Forward Ventures, Oxford Bioscience Partners and Ontario Emerging Technologies Fund.  - Paul Bonanos

Aveo/Astellas: In our “No-Deal of the Week,” Aveo Pharmaceuticals and Astellas announced Feb. 14 that they have terminated a partnership around renal cell carcinoma candidate tivozanib. The Japanese pharma paid $125 million upfront, with $50 million pegged to cover Aveo’s R&D expenses, in 2011 for worldwide rights, except for Asia, to develop, manufacture and market the compound, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor of all vascular endothelial growth factor receptors. An NDA was filed in November 2012, but an FDA “complete response” letter and unenthusiastic reception at an advisory committee left the companies not expecting approval in advanced RCC. They terminated the trial program for that indication and decided to re-focus on developing tivozanib for breast and colorectal cancers. Now, Astellas has decided to exit the collaboration for what it calls “strategic” reasons, and the two companies are terminating a Phase II program studying the compound in CRC. All rights to tivozanib will return to Aveo as of Aug. 11. - J.A.H.

Photo credit: Wikimedia Commons

Deals Of The Week: New Academia/Industry Partnership Template In Eisai/JHU Collaboration?

As founder and president of a coalition working to enhance academic drug-discovery and collaborations between academia and industry, Barbara Slusher has a good idea of the advantages and pitfalls of such arrangements. She points to ongoing work between Japan’s Eisai and Johns Hopkins University, where she serves as director of neurotranslational drug discovery at the medical school’s Brain Science Institute, as a potentially more mutually rewarding template for academic/industry tie-ups.

In October 2011, Eisai signed a five-year drug-discovery alliance with JHU, initially slated to focus on central nervous system targets. Slusher, who heads up the Academic Drug Discovery Consortium (ADDC) in addition to her responsibilities at JHU, said the partners are about 18 months into a partnership currently focused on two targets, one undisclosed. The other is aimed at identifying drug-like molecules that inhibit xCT, a glutamate cysteine exchanger that Eisai believes could offer potential in combating inflammatory disease.

Barbara Slusher, JHU Brain Science Institute
and Academic Drug Discovery Consortium

Under this alliance, written to last the greater of five years or to the completion or termination of all related projects, the Brain Science Institute reviews target research throughout JHU’s roster of researchers and presents potentially novel and interesting targets for Eisai’s review. Eisai then selects the targets of greatest interest for the high-throughput screening collaboration.

The compound libraries generally available to academic researchers are not as large, diverse or drug-like as those found within a biopharmaceutical company’s library, developed through years of wide-ranging R&D work, Slusher said. Slusher came to JHU in 2010 after working in drug discovery at five biopharma companies, including Eisai, and set a goal of establishing collaborations offering greater potential for academic discovery work.

“One of the things that my team did when we first came to Hopkins was try to establish a relationship with a pharma company such that if any targets we identified were of interest to the company, we would develop a high-throughput screening assay, share that with the company, and they would screen using our assay and compound library,” she said.

“At the point that they find hits, they then transfer those back to my team here and we do all the drug discovery and chemistry to identify a compound to get to the clinic,” Slusher added. “At that point, Eisai has first rights to license that compound.”

“The exciting thing about this collaboration is that it is truly a win/win,” she continued. “From my perspective, academia is excellent at identifying new targets of therapeutic interest, but our screening ability is limited due to the size and quality of the compound libraries available. Our collaboration with Eisai gives us access to a real pharma library. From the Eisai side, the collaboration provides access to new targets and novel therapeutic approaches.”

Lynn Kramer, Eisai’s chief clinical officer and president of its Neuroscience and General Medicine Product Creation Unit (PCU), concurs, saying the JHU tie-up and a similar partnership with University College London, offer Eisai “a novel target identification program that incorporates early drug development.”

“For us, it expands the novelty of our programs and it’s designed to utilize the best skills from each of the two partners to facilitate drug development and pass the compounds back and forth between our strengths and their strengths,” he said. The Brain Science Institute is a little unique from an academic perspective in that it has a number of people who have a lot of drug-development experience in pharmacokinetics, medicinal chemistry, toxicology and animal models,” skills that increasingly are available in top academic medical centers as they try to move up the research value chain.

Lynn Kramer, Eisai

Slusher’s team sorts through the most-promising research from a consolidated team of about 550 researchers to find target prospects for Eisai. His company therefore has access to the most concentrated group of neuroscience researchers outside of Boston, but with a single point of contact and first rights to option programs, Kramer said. JHU advances the programs selected by Eisai as far as the IND-ready stage, with pre-arranged terms for licensing fees, milestones and royalties on those assets it takes in-house.

“Eisai has the ability at multiple stages to come in and acquire the project,” Slusher said. “Depending upon when they in-license, the value derived by the university varies. If Eisai in-licenses the drugs early in the process, Johns Hopkins derives less value than if they in-license late in the process. It’s correlative to the amount of effort we’ve put in.”

About 18 months into the collaboration, JHU has developed assays for the two targets, Eisai has conducted high-throughput screening and is now sending first hits back the university for the next stages of work. “We probably have a year or two of chemistry and drug discovery to do before leads will be identified as options for the company,” Slusher noted. “This whole process probably likely will take three to five years.”

Kramer would not specify Eisai’s internal goals for producing a first clinical candidate from the partnership, other than to say “our goal is in the not-too-distant future – by that I don’t mean in a year. This takes a while.”

In general, Kramer thinks further collaboration with academia will be beneficial for his company. ADDC, founded in 2012, intends to serve as a clearinghouse for both academia and industry on research taking place within U.S. and international drug research programs. It doesn’t do tech-transfer work itself, but aims to make it easier for academics and biopharmaceutical companies to work together.

“You see from our two associations that they’re very flexible,” Kramer said. “We have gotten away from a lot of the intellectual property issues that used to plague the industry, because we’re really interested in molecule IP, not target IP, which used to lead to years of back and forth and impaired academic development. By getting over that hurdle, I view the academic groups as our ‘bread-and-butter’ for novel targets. It’s very hard in the industry to develop a novel, previously unidentified target – it’s too expensive and takes too long.”

It wasn’t just the academic world that biopharma companies were dealing with this past week, though. Read on for …

Teva/NuPathe: Teva expects to launch the migraine patch Zecuity (sumatriptan iontrophoretic transdermal system) in the first half of 2014 after acquiring the developer, NuPathe. The two announced the acquisition plans Jan. 21, with Teva’s $3.65 per share offer, approximately $144 million upfront, trumping rival bidder Endo’s proposal of $3.15 per share. Teva, which needs near-term revenue generators, gains a new product to add to its specialty central nervous system portfolio. FDA already approved the drug in January 2013, but NuPathe held out on commercializing it in order to find a partner. The drug is the only patch approved for migraine. The Israeli pharma’s offer represents a significant 58% premium over the $2.30 NuPathe shares closed at on Dec. 13, the last business day before Endo announced its intentions to buy the company. But it doesn’t offer much financial reward for longer-term investors. NuPathe’s stock opened at $3.80 about a year ago, on Jan. 18, the day after Zecuity was approved by FDA. NuPathe investors could receive additional payments, however, of up to $3.15 per share based on the future sales performance of Zecuity. Investors will receive $2.15 per share if net sales of the product are at least $100 million in any four consecutive calendar quarters on or prior to the ninth anniversary launch date. Another $1.00 per share in cash is payable if sales are at least $300 million in any four calendar quarters over the same time period. - Jessica Merrill

Par Pharmaceuticals/JHP Pharmaceuticals: Par Pharmaceutical is looking to expand the types of generic drugs it can offer beyond the solid, oral-dose pills it has been producing for years. The Woodcliff Lakes, N.J.-based company announced Jan. 21 that is has entered into an agreement to acquire privately held JHP Pharmaceuticals for $490 million in cash, a 2.5x return on investment for JHP’s main investor, private equity firm Warburg Pincus. Par has arranged for $505 million in debt financing to cover the deal and related costs. JHP and all of its assets, including a sterile manufacturing facility in Rochester, MI, will become a wholly owned subsidiary once the deal closes later this quarter. JHP was launched in 2007 when it acquired biologics contract manufacturing assets acquired from King Pharmaceuticals (now part of Pfizer) for $92 million. JHP performs contract manufacturing services worldwide for pharma and biotech customers, producing sterile injectables that require liquid, lyophilized and suspension formulations. The King deal also included branded hospital and acute-care drugs that JHP distributes. The main appeal of JHP to Par is the 14 specialty injectables that it already has on the market, as well as 30 additional candidates it has in its pipeline. Par is looking to expand into high-barrier-to-entry injectable generics as some of the major players in that space falter due to manufacturing problems. - Lisa LaMotta

Biocon/Advaxis: India’s Biocon and New Jersey biotech Advaxis announced an exclusive licensing pact Jan. 22 for co-development and commercialization of ADXS-HPV, a novel cancer immunotherapy for treatment of human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated cervical cancer in women. The deal covers India and key Asian emerging markets and gives Biocon access to Advaxis’ innovative and proprietary technology for the development of other novel therapeutics. Advaxis recently completed Phase II clinical trials in patients with recurrent cervical cancer in India, and the immunotherapy also is being evaluated in three clinical trials for HPV-associated cancer like recurrent advanced cervical cancer, head and neck cancer, and anal cancer. A spokesperson for Advaxis said the company will receive double-digit royalties on all sales of its immunotherapy product. The biotech will have exclusive rights to supply ADXS-HPV to Biocon, and Biocon will be required to purchase its requirements of ADXS-HPV exclusively from Advaxis at the specified contract price, which may be adjusted periodically. In addition, Advaxis will be entitled to a “six-figure” milestone payment if net sales of ADXS-HPV for the contract year following the initiation of clinical trials in India exceed certain specified thresholds. - Vikas Dandekar

McKesson/Celesio: In a “No Deal” that has turned into a deal, 10 days after saying its proposed acquisition of German drug wholesaler Celesio had fallen through, U.S. drug wholesaler McKesson has reached agreements that will allow it to complete the purchase after all. McKesson launched its bid to greatly expand its global reach through Celesio in October 2013. However, on Jan. 13 it announced that the deal could not be completed due to its failure to acquire 75% of outstanding Celesio shares through a tender offer. Then, in a Jan. 23 release, McKesson said it had reached an agreement with Franz Haniel & Cie. GmbH to acquire its entire holding of Celesio shares at €23.50 per share and another agreement with an affiliate of Elliott Management to acquire Celesio convertible bonds, which will be enough to give McKesson more than 75% ownership of Celesio on a fully diluted basis. The transactions are expected to close within 10 business days. McKesson plans to launch a voluntary tender offer to purchase shares from the remaining minority shareholders shortly after the close of the other transactions. The company said it will consolidate the financial results of Celesio during its fiscal fourth quarter ending March 31, and McKesson’s earnings will reflect its proportionate share of Celesio’s earnings. It expects to realize annual synergies of between $275 million to $325 million four years after the close of the deal. - Scott Steinke



Photo credits: Johns Hopkins University, Eisai Co. Ltd.

Deals Of The Week: Vaxxas To Help Shape The Next Generation Of Vaccines

Australian/U.S. biotech Vaxxas came out of stealth mode Oct. 8, announcing a deal with Merck & Co. in which the biotech’s proprietary Nanopatch technology will be tested with Merck vaccines as a delivery vehicle offering potential advantages for ease of administration and potency.

Based on technology developed in the lab of Dr. Mark Kendall at Australia’s University of Queensland, Nanopatch, a patch delivery system said to induce robust immune system activation by targeting vaccine to immunological cells just below the patient’s skin surface, may offer Vaxxas a string of licensing deals, including milestone payments and royalties, similar to a biotech offering small- or large-molecule drug candidates to bigger companies.

“As a vaccine-delivery mode, Nanopatch is capable of delivering a very potent immunogenic response that in some respects is akin to what you’d see in using an adjuvant. We call it a physical adjuvant,” Vaxxas CEO David Hoey told Deals of the Week. “Even though our business model is to partner with companies that are producing vaccines, we believe that use of the patch actually can provide a lot more than simply a delivery vehicle can by making vaccines more potent and perhaps opening new windows for use of vaccines in development.”

Merck and Vaxxas are not disclosing which vaccine will be tested with the technology. The agreement calls for Merck to make an undisclosed upfront payment and R&D funding and then pay potential development and approval milestones plus royalties on commercial sales for a vaccine which Vaxxas will test with the Nanopatch system. Merck gets an option to an exclusive license to produce a vaccine using Nanopatch, meaning that Vaxxas will not partner its technology with another company selling or developing a vaccine for the same indication.

The pharma also gets the option to expand the agreement to two additional vaccine types, although Hoey said exclusivity for additional indications will have to be negotiated between the two companies. “The structure of the initial vaccine candidate agreement is exclusive and has been defined, and the subsequent vaccine candidates have the potential to be exclusive but have not been defined yet,” he said. “At present, we have a landscape of opportunity minus the vaccine field that we’ve licensed under this arrangement with Merck.”

While R&D will continue in Australia at Kendall’s labs, Vaxxas also has opened an 18-person office in Cambridge, Mass., which  will focus on business development. The Boston area was chosen because it offers numerous potential licensing partners for the Nanopatch technology, added Hoey, previously the VP of business development at PathoGenetix.

Vaxxas raised a $15 million Australian (about $16 million) Series A in August 2011 backed by Australian venture capital firms OneVentures and Brandon Capital, U.S. VC firm HealthCare Ventures LLC and an Australian non-profit, Medical Research Commercialisation Fund. It was the largest venture round for an Australian company since anti-infectives biotech Avexa raised $12 million Australian in 2004.

Nanopatch is a stamp-sized device designed for painless vaccination over a period of two minutes. Providing direct access to immune cells in the skin, the self-administered, needle-free vaccine delivery system contains a nano-projection array patch to which the drug is dry-coated, so there is no need for refrigeration. It was tested in animals to deliver a flu vaccine at 1/150 the dose compared with syringe administration and also has been evaluated for vaccines for human papillomavirus, human simplex virus, Chikungunya disease and West Nile virus.

The patches are produced in the same facilities that manufacture chips for cell phones and computers, Hoey said. They are coated with projections a micron in length using a high-density array that can apply thousands to tens of thousands of projections to a single patch. A dry, needle-free delivery system, Hoey said he is confident the technology can work with many different companies’ vaccines without great formulation challenges.

“Most vaccines today are derived as liquids because needles and syringes are the predominant delivery method, however, the work that has been done by Kendall shows that by a pretty standard set of steps you can prepare a vaccine to be deposited and dried down on a patch,” he explained. “There’s a series of excipients that can be added to existing vaccines to make them adaptable in a format suitable for use in conjunction with the patch. So there’s no specific formulation required of the vaccine provider.”

In searching for partners, Vaxxas is not prioritizing certain indications but trying to position itself by sharing data with vaccine makers showing the technology’s potential to increase vaccine potency and offer the possibility of easier dosing, possibly even self-administration. And Vaxxas will not compete with its partners, Hoey said; the firm has no plans to develop its own vaccines using the Nanopatch technology.

Elsewhere, it was a busy week in biopharma deal-making, as we detail in our latest edition of  …

AstraZeneca/Ardelyx: In its first deal under new CEO Pascal Soriot, AstraZeneca is licensing a Phase IIb-ready kidney drug from privately held Ardelyx. Announced Oct. 7, the deal brings AstraZeneca worldwide rights to oral NHE sodium transport inhibitor RDX5791, as well as other compounds in Ardelyx’s NHE3 inhibitor program. The Fremont, Calif.-based biotech receives an upfront payment of $35 million and can earn up to $237.5 million in development and commercial milestones, along with potential double-digit royalties on product sales. NHE3 is sodium-hydrogen antiporter 3, a protein essential to absorption of sodium by the intestines. The two companies believe these compounds can address end-stage renal disease, chronic kidney disease and other disorders related to sodium and fluid overload. Ardelyx has evaluated ‘5791 in a Phase IIa trial in constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome as well as a pair of Phase I studies in healthy subjects to determine the compound’s ability to divert sodium absorption from the gastrointestinal tract. The deal gives Ardelyx an option to co-promote ‘5791 in the U.S. AstraZeneca will assume development costs for the drug, while the biotech will conduct Phase IIb studies. - Joseph Haas

Roche/Inception: A drug-hunting venture borne out of the Bristol-Myers Squibb/Amira Pharmaceuticals buyout in 2011 has resulted in a new opportunity for Roche. Under a novel collaboration structure involving big pharma, venture capital and biotech, Inception Science will create a third company – called Inception 3 – to discover and develop small molecule drug candidates for sensorineural hearing loss based on technology licensed from Stanford University. Roche, which will fund Inception 3’s work with milestone-based R&D payments, will hold an option to acquire the program upon the filing of the first IND based on the Stanford technology. Inception’s backer Versant Ventures, meanwhile, will provide the equity financing for the new company, under an agreement announced Oct. 10. Inception, which consists of two current small biotechs (Inception 1 and Inception 2) focused on neurology and oncology, arose from assets spun out by Bristol after it acquired Amira for $325 million upfront in July 2011. Bristol’s focus was on idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis candidate AM152, and it spun out much of Amira’s remaining intellectual property into Inception, backed by Versant and led by former Amira CEO Peppi Prasit, known around the biopharma industry for his “drug-hunting” acumen. The various parties are not disclosing any financial details about the collaboration nor providing a timeline to the potential IND filing at FDA. However, Clare Ozawa, chief business officer at Inception and a former officer at Versant, said the combined capabilities of Inception and Roche should result in rapid progress toward a clinical candidate. “Because we’re combining capabilities across both Roche and Inception, we think we have the fastest ability possible to get to IND stage as quickly as possible,” she said in an interview. - JAH

GlaxoSmithKline/Aeras: The joint development of a tuberculosis vaccine, expected to be of use in addition to BCG vaccine to prevent pulmonary TB, is the aim of a collaboration also announced Oct. 10 between GlaxoSmithKline and Aeras Global TB Vaccine Foundation, the Rockville, Md.-based non-profit TB vaccine development organization. BCG vaccine prevents some forms of TB in infants, but does not prevent pulmonary TB, which accounts for the majority of infections and deaths among adolescents and adults. A new TB antigen, M72, a fusion protein which is compatible with adjuvant containing Agenus Inc.’s QS-21 Stimulon adjuvant, has been developed by GSK, and found in initial clinical trials to induce an immune response and offer an acceptable safety profile. GSK and Aeras have agreed to each provide resources in order for a Phase IIb clinical study to be conducted in Kenya, India and South Africa next year, in healthy adults aged between 18 and 50. Aeras is supporting the development of half a dozen TB vaccine candidates, the most advanced of which is Oxford University’s MVA85A, a candidate vaccine using a modified vaccinia virus as a vaccine delivery system and two other candidates initially developed by Crucell (now Johnson & Johnson) and Sanofi. Aeras is funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and other private foundations and governments. - John Davis

UCB/Harvard University: In the third research collaboration to be set up under an alliance forged in 2011, the Belgian mid-sized pharma UCB is to work with Harvard University researchers on exploiting the human intestinal microbiome for therapeutic molecules. The microbiome comprises the 100 trillion bacteria found in each person’s gastrointestinal tract. These bacteria influence the well-being of individuals and their immune systems, and UCB will provide up to $4.5 million to fund the microbiome-related research of three professors of immunology at Harvard: Christophe Benoist, Dennis Kasper and Diane Mathis. They will systematically mine and classify any new species they find in the microbiome, evaluate the impact of the microbiome on the immune system, and look for new immune-modulating molecules with potential therapeutic applications, UCB announced Oct. 10. Several companies, including VC-backed start-ups, already are looking to exploit the microbiome to develop new therapies. In total, UCB expects to spend $6 million in a multi-year agreement to fund specific research projects at Harvard in the fields of central nervous system disorders and immunology. The first project funded was with Prof. Gokhan Hotamisligil, to identify antibodies against an undisclosed target in metabolic diseases. The second, concluded in June 2012, was with cell biology professor Junying Yuan, who was to develop small molecules which induce autophagy. This is the process in which cells ingest intracellular components and offers potential in the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases. - JD

Sanofi/Massachusetts General Hospital: Sanofi is expanding its presence in the Boston research community through a translational medicine collaboration with Massachusetts General Hospital. MGH will work with Sanofi’s oncology division on two preclinical molecules that were discovered in Sanofi’s labs. The teams will include scientists from both organizations and will be “highly collaborative.” Financial terms of the deal were not disclosed, but it will encompass a two-year period during which the compounds are expected to enter the clinic. The deal terms are flexible enough that other molecules may be added to the collaboration in the future and the timeframe of the collaboration may be extended. The focus of the collaboration will be on translational medicine solutions in oncology. “Sanofi Oncology takes a dedicated and integrated translational medicine approach by understanding the problems that doctors and patients are facing, both from the perspective of a pharmaceutical company and that of a diagnostic company,” said Donald Bergstrom, head of translational and experimental medicine at Sanofi Oncology. Bergstrom added that finding biomarkers will be a key part of the collaboration. The researchers will be focusing on which patient groups will benefit best from the drugs being developed and how to design the clinical program to achieve successful results. - Lisa LaMotta

Roche/Lilly/Washington University: Roche and Eli Lilly will see their investigational drugs tested in a large-scale Alzheimer’s disease trial run by Washington University in St. Louis. Roche’s amyloid beta antibody gantenerumab and Lilly’s solanezumab have been chosen by the university’s School of Medicine for testing in a clinical trial to study if the drugs can prevent the loss of cognitive function in people with inherited mutations that cause early-onset Alzheimer’s disease, the university announced Oct. 10. A third drug, a beta secretase inhibitor also developed by Lilly, is under consideration as well. The trial, expected to begin in early 2013, will be conducted by the university's  Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer’s Network Trials Unit , which is funded in part by NIH, the Alzheimer’s Association, and the DIAN Pharma Consortium composed of 10 pharmaceutical companies. The Roche and Lilly drugs were selected from more than a dozen nominations, with each offering a unique approach to counter the effects of amyloid beta, which builds up in the brains of patients with Alzheimer’s disease. All three drugs have been tested in earlier clinical trials to evaluate safety and efficacy. Gantenerumab is in a Phase III trial testing the drug in early-stage Alzheimer’s patients who have not yet experienced symptoms of dementia. Solanezumab has been making headlines recently; it failed in two high-profile Phase III trials in patients with Alzheimer’s disease, but did show signs of efficacy for slowing cognitive decline in a secondary analysis of pooled data. Roche and Lilly will make the treatments available at no cost and provide supporting grants. The Alzheimer’s Association provided a $4.2 million grant. The trial will enroll 160 people with inherited mutations for Alzheimer’s at a point when they would be within 10 to 15 years of the anticipated age when symptoms of cognitive decline and dementia would appear. An additional 80 participants who did not inherit the mutations also will be monitored. - Jessica Merrill

MedImmune/Cancer Research Institute/Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research: MedImmune, the biologics arm of AstraZeneca, has set up a collaboration with two non-profit research organizations, the Cancer Research Institute and the Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, to collaborate on clinical trials to test combinations of three novel monoclonal antibodies from MedImmune’s pipeline. The partners also said they are open to including promising non-MedImmune novel compounds in the trials. The agreement, announced Oct. 9, calls for Ludwig and CRI, with input from MedImmune, to conduct the trials using yet-to-be determined combinations of the three compounds, and/or other compounds the partners are working on, or other potential partners might offer up. One of the compounds is tremelimumab, which Pfizer gave up on several years ago and which belongs to the same class as Bristol’s successful melanoma treatment Yervoy (ipilimumab), but MedImmune and its collaborators insist that the problem with tremelimumab was due to the clinical trial design, not the compound itself. CRI’s Cancer Vaccine Acceleration Fund, a two-year-old venture philanthropy group set up to invest in and facilitate innovative cancer immunotherapy trials, is funding the trials. MedImmune is supplying the drugs and, depending on results of the clinical trials, plans to commercialize them and make milestone payments to its backers. The biotech also is continuing to develop the compounds separately, based on its original plans. - Wendy Diller

Picture credit: Nano-structure geometry

Financings of the Fortnight Ponders Neurodegenerative Death And Taxes

The big funding news this fortnight doesn’t come from public or private investors, it comes from taxpayers. As "The Pink Sheet" DAILY reported May 15, the Obama administration formally rolled out its national Alzheimer’s plan, which has been in the works for more than a year.

Alzheimer’s and other dementia-related diseases were already slated to get $450 million in National Institutes of Health funding in 2012, with the same amount proposed by the White House for 2013, but the new plan adds extra money: $50 million right away this year and $80 million proposed for next year, with another $20 million for caregiver support, education, data collection and other services.

Intriguing, then, that in a field where clinical trial costs are often cited as a major barrier to an already-skittish industry getting more deeply involved, nearly half of the extra $50 million for 2012 is earmarked for clinical trials. It won't help struggling biotechs push promising treatments, mind you; $16 million is going toward a prevention trial using the Roche/Genentech-sponsored antibody crenezumab to test still-healthy members of extended families in and around Medellin, Colombia, who share a rare genetic mutation that almost assures them of early-onset Alzheimer’s. The study, which the sponsors consider to be a Phase II adaptive trial, will cost an estimated $100 million. A private research group, the Banner Alzheimer’s Institute of Phoenix, is in charge, and chose crenezumab as the agent last December because it has demonstrated a better safety profile so far in early Alzheimer’s trials conducted by Genentech.

In addition to the NIH’s $16 million, Banner is putting up $15 million. Genentech will pay the remaining costs, but it’s unclear who will pay if the cost runs beyond $100 million. (Genentech spokeswoman Robin Snyder declined to speculate on additional costs but said the company doesn’t expect funding to be an issue.)

However it plays out, the fact of mighty Roche getting subsidies for as much as one-third of a major trial is, at the least, a sign of the importance of making progress – any progress at all – in Alzheimer’s R&D. We’re not complaining; if $16 million of our national treasure brings about an Alzheimer’s breakthrough, or simply speeds the progress toward one, it’s money well spent and a pittance compared to the costly burden of the disease now and a generation from now.

But to be clear: Neither Banner nor NIH accrue any rights to crenezumab, which Genentech licensed from Swiss biotech AC Immune in 2006, so if the trial points toward crenezumab as a viable treatment, Genentech/Roche could be sitting on a gold mine. The trial is expected to run five years, with an interim analysis after two. At that point the investigators would evaluate continuation of the trial to support an application for approval, said Snyder. “We are hopeful that the trial will support an indication, the specifics of which are yet to be discussed with regulatory authorities,” she wrote in an email. “If it works we would like crenezumab to be as broadly available to patients who may be eligible.”

The Banner Institute plans at some point to test the same antibody in people at higher risk for the more common form of Alzheimer’s.

A side note: Steering millions of federal dollars toward potentially groundbreaking Alzheimer’s trials hasn’t yet provoked the same skepticism as the millions being steered toward other drug discovery and development efforts under the new translational center known as NCATS.

Funding crucial Alzheimer’s trials is of course a different proposition than, say, repurposing drugs that have sat on industry shelves or fallen out of use, one of the mandates of NCATS, which had a $575 million budget this year. But both efforts are dollars spent that, in a parallel universe, perhaps, might have gone toward basic biomedical research, a common refrain from critics. (Our START-UP colleagues, who profile a different source of funding for biotech innovation every month in the “Capital Matters” column, wrote about one of the NCATS programs, the Therapeutics for Rare and Neglected Diseases, or TRND, a few months ago. You can read it here.)

Our friends at Pink Sheet are all over the NCATS story, and we suggest you follow along. It will require a subscription, but to paraphrase the late Donna Summer, they work hard for the money. So hard for it, honey. Rest in peace, disco queen, and same to you, go-go king. No one loves to love you, baby, more than…

Arena Pharmaceuticals: Wasting little time, Arena announced May 16 it priced a secondary stock offering and grossed $60.5 million just six days after an FDA advisory committee voted 18-4 in favor of Arena’s weight-loss drug lorcaserin. Arena sold 11 million shares at $5.50 per share, although shares reached as high as $7.02 on May 11, the day of the committee vote. Shares closed May 16 at $5.67. The vote doesn’t guarantee approval of lorcaserin, but it’s a notable reversal. The panel voted down the drug in September 2010, largely due to data that showed an increase in tumors in rat studies. A reassessment of that data, plus new information on the tumors’ causes, reassured the panel this time around that the cancer risk is negligible. Obesity drugs need to meet only one of two criteria set out in FDA’s draft guidance on weight management products: they either must provide a 5% weight loss in 35% of patients on-treatment and twice as many patients on-treatment as on-placebo; or there must be at least a 5% difference between weight loss in the active-product and placebo groups. Lorcaserin met the former standard, but not the latter. (More details about the panel’s decision is here, courtesy of our Pink Sheet colleagues.) Lorcaserin’s PDUFA date is June 27, so Arena’s new cash reserves give it a boost for commercialization, although in a deal expanded just before the committee vote, Eisai owns commercial rights to the drug in the US, Mexico, Canada and Brazil. Underwriters Jeffries & Co. and Piper Jaffray & Co., with help from BMO Capital Markets, have the option to sell up to 1.65 million additional shares. Two other sponsors of obesity are vying for FDA approval. Qnexa from Vivus has a PDUFA date of July 17, and Orexigen Therapeutics, which agreed to conduct a cardiovascular outcomes trial, hopes to re-file Contrave for approval in 2014. -- Cathy Dombrowski and Alex Lash

OncoMed Pharmceuticals: One of the first cancer stem cell companies, OncoMed is now hoping to cash in on the cancer stem cell hype (which just happens to be the subject of a forthcoming feature in Start-Up magazine). After all, OncoMed, founded in 2004, is a relative graybeard of the field, with a couple of alliances under its belt and three programs in the clinic. Tiny Verastem notched a $63 million IPO in late January without anything yet in the clinic, and another company, Stemline Therapeutics, filed its IPO papers in April. OncoMed hasn’t set terms yet, but it won’t be a surprise if it aims sky-high. Venture backers have put at least $170 million into the company since its founding, most of it coming in a massive Series B in 2008. There are seven venture funds and one strategic investor with stakes of 5% or more in OncoMed, led by U.S. Venture Partners (17%), Latterell Venture Partners (12%), and GlaxoSmithKline (12%), which also owns options for worldwide rights to two OncoMed antibodies. GSK can exercise the options at either the end of Phase I or Phase II proof of concept trials. OncoMed owns exclusive rights to its lead compound, the antibody demcizumab, and is currently testing it in two Phase Ib trials, both in combination with chemotherapy agents.  -- A.L.

Egalet: In its second incarnation, Danish pain management firm Egalet Ltd. has raised $14.3 million in Series B financing. The firm restructured and recapitalized in 2010, shedding its cardiovascular program to focus on its abuse-resistant Egalet technology for the development of opioid and non-opioid pain medications.  The company is preparing to advance lead candidate EGP066, an extended-release form of morphine, into Phase III studies. The Egalet platform creates tablets that erode at a controlled rate to produce prolonged- or delayed-release delivery. It also prevents the drug ingredient from being easily extracted, which deters drug abusers from chewing, snorting, or injecting it. First-time investor CLS Capital joined returning shareholders Atlas Venture, Omega Funds, Sunstone Capital, and Index Ventures, which committed to a two-tranched €2 million ($2.6 million) Series A round in August 2010.  Prior to the recap, Egalet A/S had raised at least $60mm in venture financing. In December 2009, it out-licensed its CV compound, the beta blocker EGP042, to RedHill Biopharma. The firm has a second formulation technology, Parvulet, that creates a soft pudding-like substance that can be eaten with a spoon. Farther down its pipeline are extended-release versions of oxycodone, hydrocodone, and hydromorphone. -- Amanda Micklus

Dynavax Technologies: Like Arena, Dynavax is a veteran biotech hoping to soon celebrate its first product launch, with the hepatitis B vaccine Heplisav now before the FDA for review. Dynavax tapped the public markets, raising $74.4 million on May 9 before deductions and expenses. It sold 17.5 million shares at $4.25 apiece, adding more than 10% of its share count to the outstanding base. If that’s not enough dilution, underwriters have the option to sell another 2.6 million shares. What’s more, Dynavax also announced just before the share sale that longtime CEO Dino Dina will step aside for a more commercially experienced successor. He’ll remain CEO until the search is complete, and he’ll also keep his board seat, Dynavax said. Investors didn’t take kindly to the CEO news or the offering, which was priced 17% below the previous day’s close of $5.09. Shares have continued to decline, closing May 17 at $3.76. But Dynavax needs the cash, as it owns full rights to Heplisav, for now at least, and says it intends to launch it independently in the US. Historically, biotechs that keep worldwide or at least US rights to their first commercial products fare better in the long term, but a successful launch is no guarantee. Dendreon’s prostate cancer treatment Provenge (sipuleucel-T) and Human Genome Sciences’ breakthrough lupus drug Benlysta (belimumab), both hailed as welcome additions in under-served indications, have faltered badly out of the gate. That's led to new management for Dendreon and, for HGS, a hostile takeover bid from marketing partner GSK. -- A.L.

Image courtesy of flickr user brain_blogger. How appropriate.